
Or, is it just tasty?


It's actually a parody thread of "a secular debate about abortion"Thinking Aloud wrote:Tigers and things should definitely be banned from eating meat.
P.S. I'm glad this is in Atheism and Religion.
I know. It's heading for surreal.Coito ergo sum wrote:It's actually a parody thread of "a secular debate about abortion"Thinking Aloud wrote:Tigers and things should definitely be banned from eating meat.
P.S. I'm glad this is in Atheism and Religion.

I think atheists can argue that humans are superior to other animals. We certainly have greater cognitive abilities and a degree of sentience not shared by any other animals. An atheist could argue for a nature-given superiority, rather than a god-given superiority.Feck wrote:It's difficult to justify having any part of the meat industry ,of course theists can fall back on their superiority to animals ,atheists can't .
The chick in the foreground package is just asking for it. Hawt.Coito ergo sum wrote:Is it murder? Not murder, but otherwise wrong?
Or, is it just tasty?
I bought chicken from the supermarket yesterday as the butchers was closed, I felt dirtyFeck wrote:It's difficult to justify having any part of the meat industry ,of course theists can fall back on their superiority to animals ,atheists can't .

Feck wrote:It's difficult to justify having any part of the meat industry ,of course theists can fall back on their superiority to animals ,atheists can't .
hmm funny, I don't like eating meat and my body is not designed to run on it as a part of a balanced diet.AnInconvenientScotsman wrote:I like eating meat and my body's designed to run on it as part of a balanced diet.
The meat industry is a totally different issue. Morally, it's easy to argue against its' very existence. On the other hand, could individuals within society function if they had to hunt or keep their own animals for food?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 144 guests