I should be used to people unworthy by half running for the top office (damn, I don't thing there's been a worthy person at the helm since march 1974), and to the voter being taken for a moron (well, most of them are anyway) but this...
Last time, I was bothered over szarkoszyt's oratory rather obviously taking some cue from hitler's (minus antisemitism), and la royal's perpetual connitude... but this time is even worse
szark's not only having fascist overtones, he openly campaigns to make this country a totalitarian police state where freedoms will be the sole privilege of those with both more money than they can use and well placed friends
and the rest have nothing of substance to propose instead.
most of the campaign actually consists of people saying little perfidious things about this political adversary or that, and dissecting every speech or interview of the candidates for things they can say ill of, even if it hurts their position more to retort to their opponents thant if they had let them hang themselves (mostly because they try to make fuel of everything, not just of what will burn).
To boot, this morning, some moron I don't remember noted that our political right had strayed from its conservative roots and gone all liberal.

Given that the old style was socially conservative (the wealthy must stay so, their rule must not be significantly challenged, the poor are "dangerous" classes when they don't know to keep their place), while the current right is liberal... in an economic meaning of the term (laissez faire, don't tax us, don't limit our freedoms of action with regs, and especially set no standards for product quality or for how we can treat the workers who should already be grateful to have a job rather than demand it also feed them)... that bit quite riled me up for complete nonsense. I don't even remember who it was saidd the gem, or even what side he is on.