Political posterizing redux.

[Jason]

I don't think Sandi has a position. He reminds me of a guy I knew who would smoke a lot of pot and talk shit about the 'evil government' and its 'plots'.

[JimC]

I don't think Sandi has a position. He reminds me of a guy I knew who would smoke a lot of pot and talk shit about the 'evil government' and its 'plots'.

[sandinista]

I don't think Sandi has a position. He reminds me of a guy I knew who would smoke a lot of pot and talk shit about the 'evil government' and its 'plots'.

Well, the first half of your description fits. Not so much with the second half. I don't call anything "evil". As for "plots"...not sure why that is in quotes. You believe that governments never "plot" anything. Are you that naive?

[Gawdzilla Sama]

I don't think Sandi has a position. He reminds me of a guy I knew who would smoke a lot of pot and talk shit about the 'evil government' and its 'plots'.

He's just disappoint that he wasn't born in 1945. This means he doesn't get to be that campus radical who wants to "stick it to the man!". It also means he'll never get laid.

By a female.


By a human female.


By a conscious human female.

[sandinista]

I don't think Sandi has a position. He reminds me of a guy I knew who would smoke a lot of pot and talk shit about the 'evil government' and its 'plots'.

He's just disappoint that he wasn't born in 1945. This means he doesn't get to be that campus radical who wants to "stick it to the man!". It also means he'll never get laid.

By a female.


By a human female.


By a conscious human female.

didn't think you could get less clever. I was wrong, lame pathetic.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Oh, I wouldn't call you "lame pathetic". I don't respect you enough for that sobriquet.

[sandinista]

Oh, I wouldn't call you "lame pathetic". I don't respect you enough for that sobriquet.

boooring...old...lame...man

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Okay, back on ignore with the other pigs.

[sandinista]

Okay, back on ignore with the other pigs.

oh, you mean you took me off "ignore"? Must have been all the butt licking talk, got you hot, had to lift the ignore in hopes for more.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Nothing to see here.

[sandinista]

Nothing to see here.

When it comes to you nothing to read here either.

[Coito ergo sum]

Pretty much a poster sandinista would love too...

Interesting how the left and right approach each other on many issues...

whatever JimC, how can you label who is "left" or "right"? WTF are you? Let me guess...the center. Such bullshit.

OK, I'm a naughty label maker, but like CES, you love the poster, right?

Isn't it funny? It makes the point that if you object to pouring water on someone's face to simulate drowning, then one might well have even more of a beef with widespread drones bombing people and blowing them to tiny bits.

Actually, attacking Obama on this issue from the "left" is at least a hell of a lot less hypocritical than an attack from republican supporters.

You mean, one can't be against drone attacks if one was also against waterboarding? Or, if one was against waterboarding, it's not hypocritical to not be against drone attacks?

EDIT - I gain much reassurance when attacked about equally by you and Seth - extremists of all camps are always fearful of a rational middle ground...

So, the middle ground you take is what? Drone attacks are o.k.? Or, do you oppose the drone attacks? Did it depend on who is President?

[Coito ergo sum]

[Jason]

Drone attacks that kill innocent civilians with the foreknowledge that they are there, or there is a high probability they are there, are bad. M'Kay?
Torture is bad. M'Kay?

Now it's up to you to decide which is more bad. M'Kay?

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Drone attacks that kill innocent civilians with the foreknowledge that they are there, or there is a high probability they are there, are bad. M'Kay?
Torture is bad. M'Kay?

Now it's up to you to decide which is more bad. M'Kay?

Anecdotal: I can state that if it weren't for one session of torture I have been dead four decades ago.