"Dubya"Jesus_of_Nazareth wrote:The Americans have no word for Dumbass.

"Dubya"Jesus_of_Nazareth wrote:The Americans have no word for Dumbass.
Much as the Id-driven brute inside me would like to take issue with your post, I think there's a kernel of truth to be found somewhere in there (at least about the language part). When I was 12 I had the option of choosing French or Spanish as the language I'd like to learn in school. I picked French. Between the two, it seemed much more intelligent, more cultured, and I knew there'd be more girls in those classes than in the Spanish ones.Svartalf wrote:We can't help it if the beauty of our language, not to mention the superiority of our culture and achievements just make the rest of the world feel inferior.Coito ergo sum wrote:Frenchness has always, not just this time in history, and not just among right-wingers, been viewed negatively, and Americans didn't invent it. We got it from the Brits.Ian wrote:I don't think it's the ability to speak a foreign language that is the case here. Mr. Huntsman speaks Mandarin Chinese, and I think most people, even the most knuckle-dragging Republicans, would consider that to be a big plus. George W. Bush spoke Spanish. It's the particular language: French. At this time in US history, it invites a certain amount of antipathy among right-wingers.
But, it is correct, it's not the knowledge of another language that is the issue. It's the Frenchness. The French and France have an air about them of effete snobbery, and an attitude of superiority.
Nothing bad to say about Spanish as a literary language... writers like Cervantez, Garcia-Marquez and Garcia-Lorca have much to commend them... and unless you are intimately involved in Northern and Western Africa, I suspect Spanish is a much more common and useful communication tool.Ian wrote:Much as the Id-driven brute inside me would like to take issue with your post, I think there's a kernel of truth to be found somewhere in there (at least about the language part). When I was 12 I had the option of choosing French or Spanish as the language I'd like to learn in school. I picked French. Between the two, it seemed much more intelligent, more cultured, and I knew there'd be more girls in those classes than in the Spanish ones.Svartalf wrote:We can't help it if the beauty of our language, not to mention the superiority of our culture and achievements just make the rest of the world feel inferior.Coito ergo sum wrote:Frenchness has always, not just this time in history, and not just among right-wingers, been viewed negatively, and Americans didn't invent it. We got it from the Brits.Ian wrote:I don't think it's the ability to speak a foreign language that is the case here. Mr. Huntsman speaks Mandarin Chinese, and I think most people, even the most knuckle-dragging Republicans, would consider that to be a big plus. George W. Bush spoke Spanish. It's the particular language: French. At this time in US history, it invites a certain amount of antipathy among right-wingers.
But, it is correct, it's not the knowledge of another language that is the issue. It's the Frenchness. The French and France have an air about them of effete snobbery, and an attitude of superiority.
I once had a Latin teacher who was so horrible I seriously envisioned giving up that subject. I still ended up being the best in my class when I did some in college... like 4 years later.Crumple wrote:My French teacher was a cruel nasty woman with one of those sharp pointed voices some women have, and a wooden leg she'd threaten to take off and hit you with. I never took to French. It didn't seem intellectual to me. A beautiful country though.
Actually not, Over the 6 years I did Latin, I had excellent ones at least 4 years out of the 6Eddie wrote:ALL Latin teachers are horrible.![]()
And I don't thing it's their fault Latin turns you into an evil dictator.
Do you have a source for that?maiforpeace wrote:However, the fine dining establishments all over Washington D.C. saw no decrease in the amount of expensive French wine purchased.
Svartalf wrote:Nothing bad to say about Spanish as a literary language... writers like Cervantez, Garcia-Marquez and Garcia-Lorca have much to commend them... and unless you are intimately involved in Northern and Western Africa, I suspect Spanish is a much more common and useful communication tool.Ian wrote:Much as the Id-driven brute inside me would like to take issue with your post, I think there's a kernel of truth to be found somewhere in there (at least about the language part). When I was 12 I had the option of choosing French or Spanish as the language I'd like to learn in school. I picked French. Between the two, it seemed much more intelligent, more cultured, and I knew there'd be more girls in those classes than in the Spanish ones.Svartalf wrote:We can't help it if the beauty of our language, not to mention the superiority of our culture and achievements just make the rest of the world feel inferior.Coito ergo sum wrote:Frenchness has always, not just this time in history, and not just among right-wingers, been viewed negatively, and Americans didn't invent it. We got it from the Brits.Ian wrote:I don't think it's the ability to speak a foreign language that is the case here. Mr. Huntsman speaks Mandarin Chinese, and I think most people, even the most knuckle-dragging Republicans, would consider that to be a big plus. George W. Bush spoke Spanish. It's the particular language: French. At this time in US history, it invites a certain amount of antipathy among right-wingers.
But, it is correct, it's not the knowledge of another language that is the issue. It's the Frenchness. The French and France have an air about them of effete snobbery, and an attitude of superiority.
Yep, but that was a different time. We weren't even a country yet. The Brits hated the French with unbridled passion, and we were trying to throw off their yoke.Jesus_of_Nazareth wrote:Coito ergo sum wrote: Frenchness has always, not just this time in history, and not just among right-wingers, been viewed negatively, and Americans didn't invent it. We got it from the Brits.
But, it is correct, it's not the knowledge of another language that is the issue. It's the Frenchness. The French and France have an air about them of effete snobbery, and an attitude of superiority.
It's a strange one - if it wasn't for the French, the Revolution would not have succeeded.
I'm sure the French don't care what anyone, Americans included, think of them. They're too busy overestimating themselves. As for the claim that Americans are stupid - I've yet to see any proof that the common European is any smarter. People are idiots. And they're idiots in France too. To be blind to that fact is evidence in and of itself....Jesus_of_Nazareth wrote: Still, I doubt if the French care what Amerikans think of 'em.......and militarly nothing to worry about either - simply because the average yank couldn't find the USA on a world map, let alone a corner of Europeland.......
On what basis do you claim that Republicans made up the fine French wine buying public? Is there some notion that Democrats in Washington, DC is da po' folk?maiforpeace wrote:drl2 wrote:The right wing in this country has gone to a lot of effort to demonize French over the years as effete snobbish pansies (does the phrase "cheese eating surrender monkey" ring any bells?) - this is just the natural progression of expressing their core values: myopia, nationalism, and anti-intellectualism. Based on their last few candidates, the requirement seems to be that you went to college but didn't learn anything there.![]()
Remember when France openly opposed the Iraq war with it's speech at the UN? Republican members of Congress were outraged, calling them traitors and no longer an ally, and very loudly insisted that they no longer call the french fries served at the congressional canteen french fries and renamed them "freedom fries". However, the fine dining establishments all over Washington D.C. saw no decrease in the amount of expensive French wine purchased.
Fucking hypocrites.
Very true, but France's behavior relative to Iraq was abysmal. Pull the rug out from under the U.S. after assurances were made, all to protect their own deals with the Iraq despot was not "helping [the US] not do something stupid." It was lining their own pockets by means of violations of international law (violations of the UN oil-for-food program, and sales of nuclear technology to the Hussein regime, among other things).Svartalf wrote:There are real dumbasses who don't understand that an ally's job is to help you not do something stupid... slavisshly following you is what you expect from client states.
Sir Figg Newton wrote:If I have seen further than others, it is only because I am surrounded by midgets.
IDMD2Cormac wrote:Doom predictors have been with humans right through our history. They are like the proverbial stopped clock - right twice a day, but not due to the efficacy of their prescience.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 23 guests