An independent Scotland?

Post Reply
User avatar
klr
(%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
Posts: 32964
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
About me: The money was just resting in my account.
Location: Airstrip Two
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by klr » Thu Oct 25, 2012 3:57 pm

ronmcd wrote: ...

So I think we all agree Scotland would be in EU, the question is immediately, or after a short negotiation, or after a long brutal series of arguments? I think sense will prevail and it will be pretty simple and seamless.
Aha! I think I see the problem. This is the EU you're dealing with. Common sense is not to be taken for granted. I'm Irish, and "negotiating" with the EU is only for those with inordinate patience, especially if you are from a small country with about 1% of the current EU population*. Salmond wants to get everything done and dusted with a year to spare. I think that's just a pipe-dream. Nothing ever goes smoothly with the EU, especially where there are power politics and money involved. I'd prefer if it were different, for the Scots as much as us Irish.
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner

The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

:mob: :comp: :mob:

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Jason » Thu Oct 25, 2012 3:57 pm

Alright. Who pissed in Red Celt's haggis? (or didn't piss.. I forget how to make haggis). :bored:

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Bella Fortuna » Thu Oct 25, 2012 3:58 pm

Red Celt wrote:
Bella Fortuna wrote:Remind me to pitch a fit next time someone makes a crack about blondes being stupid
Now imagine someone who is vocally and actively anti-blonde. Now imagine that a friend of that anti-blonde (who hasn't criticised any of his friend's anti-blonde comments) resorts to anti-blonde stereotypes. Would you see the usage of that stereotype as harmless as other stereotypes? Or might you think it reasonable to assume that there is deeper substance to that particular person resorting to stereotypes?

Read the whole thread, Bella. Then tell me your thoughts on some of the people who have been "contributing" here, and why their "contributions" have resulted in "snark".
I will do so, in fairness.
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
Audley Strange
"I blame the victim"
Posts: 7485
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Audley Strange » Thu Oct 25, 2012 3:59 pm

Schneibster?

First LIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man

User avatar
Red Celt
Humanist Misanthrope
Posts: 1349
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 8:30 pm
About me: Crow Philosopher
Location: Fife, Scotland
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Red Celt » Thu Oct 25, 2012 4:01 pm

PordFrefect wrote:Alright. Who pissed in Red Celt's haggis? (or didn't piss.. I forget how to make haggis). :bored:
I've always stood up to bigots and bullies. If you'd sooner roll up into a ball and let them kick you, be my guest.

Meanwhile I'll give as good as I get... and then some.
Image

ronmcd
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:13 pm
Location: Sunny Scotland
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by ronmcd » Thu Oct 25, 2012 4:05 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:Here's a question for Ronmcd, as I don't think I've seen anything about it. I think I know what the answer is, though. A separatist Scotland would inherit its per capita share of the armed forces, national debt etc etc. Would it relinquish any territorial claim to the remaining UK overseas territories, or would it want 8% of the Pitcairn Islands?
I've never seen anything about it either. But Scotland would be becoming an independent nation, like all the others in Europe. I see no possibility Scotland would have any desire to claim overseas territories, or any claim on them. Just as Scotland wouldnt be claiming 8 or 9% of Wales or England territory. The two parts would each retain per capita (or GDP) shares of assets and debts, as you suggest. 100% of territory and resources attributable to that territory. So any new oil and gas reserves around the Falklands? Not Scotlands business. Shale gas reserves in England? Not Scotlands business.

"Separatist" is of course a pejorative term for independence. Is UK a separatist state? When is US "Separation Day"? :roll:

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Tyrannical » Thu Oct 25, 2012 4:06 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:Here's a question for Ronmcd, as I don't think I've seen anything about it. I think I know what the answer is, though. A separatist Scotland would inherit its per capita share of the armed forces, national debt etc etc. Would it relinquish any territorial claim to the remaining UK overseas territories, or would it want 8% of the Pitcairn Islands?
Perfectly fair for the SNP to want the UK to divest itself from at least some non-British isle territories. You could either grant them full citizenship in a united countries or cut them free if it was mutually agreed. The key movement I think is a diminishing of Federal powers and an increase in local authority. Not so unlike the Ron Paul movement in the US.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

ronmcd
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:13 pm
Location: Sunny Scotland
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by ronmcd » Thu Oct 25, 2012 4:09 pm

klr wrote:
ronmcd wrote: ...

So I think we all agree Scotland would be in EU, the question is immediately, or after a short negotiation, or after a long brutal series of arguments? I think sense will prevail and it will be pretty simple and seamless.
Aha! I think I see the problem. This is the EU you're dealing with. Common sense is not to be taken for granted. I'm Irish, and "negotiating" with the EU is only for those with inordinate patience, especially if you are from a small country with about 1% of the current EU population*. Salmond wants to get everything done and dusted with a year to spare. I think that's just a pipe-dream. Nothing ever goes smoothly with the EU, especially where there are power politics and money involved. I'd prefer if it were different, for the Scots as much as us Irish.
You might well be right, it might take some time. Whats ironic is it's conservative voting England which would be most leaning towards leaving EU. But hey ho, I see no reason why potential difficulties should stop us doing something, something that presumably would be worth doing in the long term if we were going to bother doing it at all.

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41185
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Svartalf » Thu Oct 25, 2012 4:12 pm

Red Celt wrote:
Svartalf wrote:
Red Celt wrote:
Tyrannical wrote:So, who gets to be King of Scotland? Who would be Mary's closest Scottish relative? I bet the Pope could crown him while sitting above the coronation stone.
Scotland already has a monarch... and her mother was a Scot.
YOu wouldn't secede from UK and keep that harridan, latest of a long line of Hunnish usurpers for a head of state, would you?
It doesn't really matter what anyone thinks about that. The monarchy is not a part of the independence debate.
Not being a resident, I'm not directly concerned, but as a Stuart descendent, I'd be shocked if my countrymen kept those usurpers.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Tyrannical » Thu Oct 25, 2012 4:17 pm

As a Stuart decedent you are directly concerned. Blood is thicker than the English channel that separates you.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
klr
(%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
Posts: 32964
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
About me: The money was just resting in my account.
Location: Airstrip Two
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by klr » Thu Oct 25, 2012 4:18 pm

ronmcd wrote:
klr wrote:
ronmcd wrote: ...

So I think we all agree Scotland would be in EU, the question is immediately, or after a short negotiation, or after a long brutal series of arguments? I think sense will prevail and it will be pretty simple and seamless.
Aha! I think I see the problem. This is the EU you're dealing with. Common sense is not to be taken for granted. I'm Irish, and "negotiating" with the EU is only for those with inordinate patience, especially if you are from a small country with about 1% of the current EU population*. Salmond wants to get everything done and dusted with a year to spare. I think that's just a pipe-dream. Nothing ever goes smoothly with the EU, especially where there are power politics and money involved. I'd prefer if it were different, for the Scots as much as us Irish.
You might well be right, it might take some time. Whats ironic is it's conservative voting England which would be most leaning towards leaving EU. But hey ho, I see no reason why potential difficulties should stop us doing something, something that presumably would be worth doing in the long term if we were going to bother doing it at all.
I think I've alluded to this as well before. The anti-EU elements in England would use this to their own advantage. I suspect this makes those nearer the "centre" of English politics all the more concerned about a "Yes" vote. As you say, their problems are not your problems ... unless they react in such a way as to become your problem in some way or other. Life is rarely simple ...
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner

The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

:mob: :comp: :mob:

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41185
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Svartalf » Thu Oct 25, 2012 4:22 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:I prefer the term "majority UK" to "Rump UK".
Given what comes out of Westminster and 10 Downing, anywhere with London in it has to be the rump ;)
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23746
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Clinton Huxley » Thu Oct 25, 2012 4:23 pm

Svartalf wrote:
Clinton Huxley wrote:I prefer the term "majority UK" to "Rump UK".
Given what comes out of Westminster and 10 Downing, anywhere with London in it has to be the rump ;)
Now, now, London is France's fourth largest city...
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Jason » Thu Oct 25, 2012 4:24 pm

Svartalf wrote:
Red Celt wrote:
Svartalf wrote:
Red Celt wrote:
Tyrannical wrote:So, who gets to be King of Scotland? Who would be Mary's closest Scottish relative? I bet the Pope could crown him while sitting above the coronation stone.
Scotland already has a monarch... and her mother was a Scot.
YOu wouldn't secede from UK and keep that harridan, latest of a long line of Hunnish usurpers for a head of state, would you?
It doesn't really matter what anyone thinks about that. The monarchy is not a part of the independence debate.
Not being a resident, I'm not directly concerned, but as a Stuart descendent, I'd be shocked if my countrymen kept those usurpers.
As a Plantagenet I'm inclined to invade those rebellious Scots, violently oppress them, and claim 'first rights' on all their women. As a Lindsay, however, I'm inclined to remove my pants and underwear, gird my kilt about my loins, and get piss drunk.

I'm a house divided.

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Tyrannical » Thu Oct 25, 2012 4:31 pm

Wow, "first rights" is a term I haven't heard in a while. I wont diverge this thread so I wont share my views on it and evolutionary theory here. But you can literary be the seed of your own destruction.
Last edited by Tyrannical on Thu Oct 25, 2012 4:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 30 guests