Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:32 am
Scot Dutchy wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:01 am
Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:48 am
According to NL gov one in around two and a half thousand Netherlanders have died from the Covid. Isn't that evidence?
Evidence of what? That people die? Not many in a population of 17,5 million. The presumption being they died from the virus which is obviously not true. Covid attributed to their death in many cases and was not the sole cause. There are no acceptable international definitions. No time definitions either. A person dying two weeks later after testing positive is still a Covid death? In some countries yes. How about all those wonderful numbers from Africa and India.
You sound like you're claiming that Covid-19 has had no impact on the NL mortality rate. Are you?
Does it matter what the international definitions are if the NL gov have good working definitions of their own? The figures provided by the NL gov put the mortality rate from Covid-19 at around 1 for every 2500 citizens and in the specific context international definitions are neither here nor there. The fact that the NL gov are aligning their data collection with the rest of the EU is something you neglect to acknowledge.
Once again off we go. Dont you think that defining what Covid death is would be a good starting point.
Where is the proof of this so-called alignment.
The reasons to mark if somebody who recently died had also recently tested positive for Covid-19 are, 1) to help track the prevalence of the infection in the population during the epidemic, and 2) to attribute it as a cause of death if/when medics consider it a relevant factor. The UK governments for example require doctors to note Covid on death certificates if somebody tested positive within 28 days of their demise - but whether it was a primary, contributory, or merely a notable factor in their demise is a matter for those whose duty it is to write the certificates.
Yep all nicely defined? Without carrying out a post-mortem on every case you cant say it is a covid death.
Nobody is claiming that all deaths where Covid was noted are deaths in which Covid is the sole or primary cause - probability alone would suggest otherwise - but that is exactly the claim you're arguing against. In this context that makes your response a strawman argument. A strawman argument is a fallacy. A fallacy is an error in reasoning.
No? Just unbelievable. That is exactly what is happening. Stop dancing around.
You deride figures from Africa and India as automatically unreliable and yet you have no basis on which to say whether they're unreliably high or unreliably low. If they're unreliably high, meaning they're lower in actuality, then by comparison the NL is clearly doing poorly. If they're unreliably low, meaning they're actually higher in reality, then it means the virus is more virulent than is being reported, which suggests that the NL gov should be taking stringent steps to reduce the risk of infection at home. But as you will, and indeed cannot, say in what way the African and Indian figures are unreliable, only that they just are because... reasons, then you're not really contributing anything to the discussion other than a little bit of self-satisfied colonial superiority. You might as well call them 'shithole countries' and be done with it.
Both continents are not known for their excellent health care systems or government organisations. What they are well known for is corruption at all levels of society. Plenty just does not have the infrastructure for daily reporting or any reporting and yet the WHO (also partial to a few brown envelopes) publishes these figures as gospel. You dont have to be insulting (but you always are). Lets not fool ourselves when there is money a begging.
"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".