That's a silly assumption, since I obviously went directly to Crowder's YouTube channel to get his side, when your link didn't work.
But good effort at trolling.

That's a silly assumption, since I obviously went directly to Crowder's YouTube channel to get his side, when your link didn't work.
Cunt wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 8:13 pmHe is unable to put this on youtube, because of the actions taken against him.
Stossel interviewed him, at the pocketnet link i provided. Not surprised you aren't able to see it. Pocketnet is kind of shitty, and your regular channels will protect you from that interview.
So you can keep enjoying the blue-anon koolaid, or you can look for it yourself.
I found another link to it at https://ussanews.com/News1/2021/05/18/l ... interview/
But if you can't find it easily on your preferred platform, you might suspect media bias.
Or you might suspect that everyone is lying except the alphabet people, amazon and facebook.
Here’s my FULL interview with Steven Crowder — who faces censorship despite being the biggest independent news channel here.
That's quite a change from "recent coordinated removal from social media" in your initial post. Especially since he posted on his Twitter page today.Cunt wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 8:13 pmHe is unable to put this on youtube, because of the actions taken against him.
Stossel interviewed him, at the pocketnet link i provided. Not surprised you aren't able to see it. Pocketnet is kind of shitty, and your regular channels will protect you from that interview.
So you can keep enjoying the blue-anon koolaid, or you can look for it yourself.
I found another link to it at https://ussanews.com/News1/2021/05/18/l ... interview/
But if you can't find it easily on your preferred platform, you might suspect media bias.
Or you might suspect that everyone is lying except the alphabet people, amazon and facebook.
Be grateful he has not abandoned it in favour of 'Pareto distribution'.pErvinalia wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 11:24 pmBlue anon is his latest Tourette's tic. It's a good one, as it makes no sense hatsoever.
One significant example that the stalwart nitwit is apparently unaware of:CNN has fired former Republican Senator Rick Santorum over racist and false remarks he made weeks ago about Native Americans. The Huffington Post broke the news Saturday, citing a senior executive at the network. CNN has since confirmed the report.
While speaking at an event organized by Young America’s Foundation last month, the now-former CNN senior political commentator falsely and callously claimed Native American people have had no influence on U.S. culture and said there was “nothing” in America before white colonists arrived.
“We birthed a nation from nothing. I mean, there was nothing here,” Santorum said. “I mean, yes, we have Native Americans, but candidly, there isn’t much Native American culture in American culture.”
Prominent Indigenous-led organizations demanded Santorum’s immediate dismissal, including the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) and other civil rights groups.
As a youngster who was interested in history, and American history, I learned about this influence some time ago.When the delegates to the Constitutional Convention met in 1787 to debate what form of government the United States should have, there were no contemporary democracies in Europe from which they could draw inspiration. The most democratic forms of government that any of the convention members had personally encountered were those of Native American nations. Of particular interest was the Iroquois Confederacy, which historians have argued wielded a significant influence on the U.S. Constitution.
What evidence exists that the delegates studied Native governments? Descriptions of them appear in the three-volume handbook John Adams wrote for the convention surveying different types of governments and ideas about government. It included European philosophers like John Locke and Montesquieu, whom U.S. history textbooks have long identified as constitutional influences; but it also included the Iroquois Confederacy and other Indigenous governments, which many of the delegates knew through personal experience.
“You had the Cherokee chiefs having dinner with [Thomas] Jefferson’s father in Williamsburg, and then in the northern area of course you had this Philadelphia interaction with the Delaware and the Iroquois,” says Kirke Kickingbird, a lawyer, member of the Kiowa Tribe and coauthor with Lynn Kickingbird of Indians and the United States Constitution: A Forgotten Legacy.
Since the U.S. had trade and diplomatic relationships with Native governments, Kickingbird says, thinking the constitutional framers weren’t familiar with them is like saying, “Gosh, I didn’t know the Germans and the French knew each other.”
The Iroquois Confederacy was in no way an exact model for the U.S. Constitution. However, it provided something that Locke and Montesquieu couldn’t: a real-life example of some of the political concepts the framers were interested in adopting in the U.S.
The Iroquois Confederacy dates back several centuries, to when the Great Peacemaker founded it by uniting five nations: the Mohawks, the Onondaga, the Cayuga, the Oneida and the Seneca. In around 1722, the Tuscarora nation joined the Iroquois, also known as the Haudenosaunee. Together, these six nations formed a multi-state government while maintaining their own individual governance.
This stacked-government model influenced constitutional framers’ thinking, says Donald A. Grinde, Jr., a professor of transnational studies at the University of Buffalo, member of the Yamasee nation and co-author with Bruce E. Johansen of Exemplar of Liberty: Native America and the Evolution of Democracy.
The constitutional framers “cite the Iroquois and other Native governments as examples of [federalism],” he says. “Marriage and divorce is taken care of right in the village; it’s not a thing that the national government or the chiefs have to do with. Each tribe might have its own issues, but the Iroquois Confederacy is about…unification through mutual defense and it conducts foreign affairs.”
...
The United States’ bias and violence against Native Americans may have helped obscure the framers’ interest in their governments. However, public awareness of this connection increased around the 1987 bicentennial marking the 200th anniversary of the Constitution.
But we do know, and it will be forever associated with him in our minds, and after we've gone also in the anals of history.L'Emmerdeur wrote:... Mr Seepage-You'd-Rather-Not-Know-About ...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests