Scrumple wrote:Like the average Afghan is gonna be reading the international news and forming opinions.....according to Western thinking? He'd probably think it more unjust to lock the guy up given tribal loyalty as the top moral ace card. You are all out of your depth...go back to sleep?piscator wrote:JimC wrote:Pour encourage les autres...Scrumple wrote:Seems a waste of resources keeping him banged up for years when a summary discharge would have dealt with the issue. Unlikely he'd repeat the offence on the streets of the UK. The law is a ass I guess.
Yep. And for the victim's family.
Of course he was an enemy, but if you give the impression you're unjust, it can only hurt your efforts in the long run.
So you're good with torture, then? Because, last I heard, the main practical military reason against it is blowback.
I have a lot of sympathy for the poor guy who's job it is to go out day after day and walk around until some dickhead shoots at him. Regardless, the British military can't be seen as tolerating this behavior.
And they're not.