The criticism of the project talks of 'Sterilization of drug-addicts as unethical'.Warren Dew wrote:The main issue with government doing it is that the first world governments with the money are the ones with low total fertility rates that don't need to control population. If you made anyone eligible worldwide that would be better - it would cost less, and have more impact on areas with high fertility rates where it's needed - but the third world governments might object.
I'm not even sure you need government funding. There's already at least one charity doing this on a limited basis:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Prevention
I need to remember to put them on my charitable donation list.
I assume they mean that forced sterilization is unethical. This I agree with.
However the 'C.r.a.c.k.' offers are voluntary.
If OTH they mean that drug addicts are unable to make a valid decision about their own health/bodies issue, then surely they should be absolved of criminal behaviour. If you can’t make valid decisions about your own body, how on earth can you make valid decisions about your own behaviour?
My point is that objections to such plans on ethical grounds are false.