So they're not all from Florida?FBM wrote:Charles Whitman killed 16 people from the top of it. It's in Dallas. University of Texas, IIRC.


So they're not all from Florida?FBM wrote:Charles Whitman killed 16 people from the top of it. It's in Dallas. University of Texas, IIRC.
You are hard to understand, and your arguments are irrational and devoid of attachment to reality or truth.kiki5711 wrote:Coito ergo sum wrote:You really don't see that what 99% of inmates claim has nothing to do with the Zimmerman case?kiki5711 wrote:Only to you!Coito ergo sum wrote:kiki5711 wrote:Mai,
It's a well known fact that 99% of death row inmates claim they're innocent. They read their bible, become Christians, Muslims or what ever would give them leniancy in court. They are the best actors on the planet.
It's no different with zimmerman. Who could blame him? I'd do the same thing.
What a bizarre comment.
Zimmerman pled not guilty, so of course he says he didn't do it. Are you implying that because he say he is not guilty, that is an indication of guilt?
What's bizarre is that you seem to think what you typed has something to do with the matter.
That's not even getting to the fact that you, as usual, just pull your statistics out of your posterior, with no regard for whether what you're saying bears any resemblance to the truth.
Oh good god, please someone tell me someone (not coito) am I that hard to understand or is coito totally misunderstanding what I'm saying?
You really don't see that what 99% of inmates claim has nothing to do with the Zimmerman case?
Zimmerman pled not guilty, so of course he says he didn't do it. Are you implying that because he say he is not guilty, that is an indication of guilt?
What's bizarre is that you seem to think what you typed has something to do with the matter.
That's not even getting to the fact that you, as usual, just pull your statistics out of your posterior, with no regard for whether what you're saying bears any resemblance to the truth.
Oh good god, please someone tell me someone (not coito) am I that hard to understand or is coito totally misunderstanding what I'm saying?
Code: Select all
You are hard to understand, and your arguments are irrational and devoid of attachment to reality or truth.
What makes you so absolutely sure that Martin didn't attack Zimmerman first? What evidence do you have to support this conclusion? Evidence. Not opinion, not intuition, not bias or prejudice...evidence. Logic. Reasoning. Cold, hard facts. Got anything conclusive that the rest of us have missed out on? Or are you just projecting your own child into Martin's place and assuming that Martin was the same kind of person as your child?kiki5711 wrote:In fact if zimmerman really did get some of his head hurt, I'm sorry it wasn't smashed even more. I wish trayvon was an expert in kung fu, so he could have kicked his ass really good.
If you can't explain it here, I have little hope that meeting in person would refine your arguments.kiki5711 wrote:You really don't see that what 99% of inmates claim has nothing to do with the Zimmerman case?
Zimmerman pled not guilty, so of course he says he didn't do it. Are you implying that because he say he is not guilty, that is an indication of guilt?
What's bizarre is that you seem to think what you typed has something to do with the matter.
That's not even getting to the fact that you, as usual, just pull your statistics out of your posterior, with no regard for whether what you're saying bears any resemblance to the truth.Oh good god, please someone tell me someone (not coito) am I that hard to understand or is coito totally misunderstanding what I'm saying?Well maybe if we come to face to face, I can EXPLAIN it to you, and then tell you to fuck off if you still don't get it.Code: Select all
You are hard to understand, and your arguments are irrational and devoid of attachment to reality or truth.
![]()
You sound very much like one of those racists who are advocating Zimmerman's murder merely because Martin happens to have been black, as if Martin's actions have absolutely no bearing whatsoever on the justification for his killing. I somehow doubt you'd be saying this if it was Martin who murdered Zimmerman. I suspect in that case that you would be lauding Martin for brutally murdering a white person and you'd be defending his actions based on some bizarre and deranged argument that any black person can be exonerated of murdering any white person if the black person perceives some disrespect or slight.kiki5711 wrote:In fact if zimmerman really did get some of his head hurt, I'm sorry it wasn't smashed even more. I wish trayvon was an expert in kung fu, so he could have kicked his ass really good.
well come on, come into my neighborhood and we'll see if you "little gun" will do you any good.Which makes me very glad that I carry a gun too, because this sort of disgusting attitude all too often ends up in race-based crimes perpetrated by blacks against whites for no reason other than race.
Spot on!You sound very much like one of those racists
AustinFBM wrote:Charles Whitman killed 16 people from the top of it. It's in Dallas. University of Texas, IIRC.
and so do you.kiki5711 wrote:Spot on!You sound very much like one of those racists
I'm not even talking about the legalities here any more. I'm past beyond that. Someone gets in my face, they better prepare for a fight.FBM wrote:What makes you so absolutely sure that Martin didn't attack Zimmerman first? What evidence do you have to support this conclusion? Evidence. Not opinion, not intuition, not bias or prejudice...evidence. Logic. Reasoning. Cold, hard facts. Got anything conclusive that the rest of us have missed out on? Or are you just projecting your own child into Martin's place and assuming that Martin was the same kind of person as your child?kiki5711 wrote:In fact if zimmerman really did get some of his head hurt, I'm sorry it wasn't smashed even more. I wish trayvon was an expert in kung fu, so he could have kicked his ass really good.
Think what you want about each other, but calling each other racist isn't doing much for making your case(s).kiki5711 wrote:and so do you.kiki5711 wrote:Spot on!You sound very much like one of those racists
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 22 guests