Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?

Post by FBM » Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:47 pm

rasetsu wrote:This is what happens when people don't vote. And in Montana, it's not because of apathy, it's because nobody lives there. Even if they get everybody to turn out at the polls, they still can't manage a quorum. In Montana the swing vote is like Schrodinger's ballot box; all it takes is one guy to flip the state from red to blue. All it takes is one person staying home to care for a sick sheep to change the entire political map of the state. (Or more realistically, one sheep appearing unusually coquettish for that time of year.)
Indeed. If I remember correctly something I looked up several years ago, Montana is about 3x the size of Korea, but the population of what in Korea would be considered a small town.
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?

Post by Warren Dew » Sat Jul 07, 2012 2:27 pm

Tyrannical wrote:So, basically he is afraid the federal government is purposely moving endangered species onto oil rich land to prevent future drilling.
That sounds like something the Greens would try.
I suspect bison would be successful enough in Montana that they'd soon need a hunting season.

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?

Post by Tyrannical » Sat Jul 07, 2012 2:57 pm

Warren Dew wrote:
Tyrannical wrote:So, basically he is afraid the federal government is purposely moving endangered species onto oil rich land to prevent future drilling.
That sounds like something the Greens would try.
I suspect bison would be successful enough in Montana that they'd soon need a hunting season.
Oil pipelines as I recall radiate enough heat to melt the snow, thus making them attractive to wildlife.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sat Jul 07, 2012 3:11 pm

Tyrannical wrote:
Warren Dew wrote:
Tyrannical wrote:So, basically he is afraid the federal government is purposely moving endangered species onto oil rich land to prevent future drilling.
That sounds like something the Greens would try.
I suspect bison would be successful enough in Montana that they'd soon need a hunting season.
Oil pipelines as I recall radiate enough heat to melt the snow, thus making them attractive to wildlife.
If they don't block migration trails, that is.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?

Post by Seth » Sat Jul 07, 2012 3:50 pm

Tyrannical wrote:So, basically he is afraid the federal government is purposely moving endangered species onto oil rich land to prevent future drilling.
That sounds like something the Greens would try.
And that's exactly what they are doing. It's all part of the grand "rewilding" plan for the west, in which most of the land west of the Mississippi is deliberately depopulated of humans, who are sent to live in highly dense urban "gulags" while the critters are allowed to retake the rest of the land and humans are prohibited from entering their "natural habitat."

It's not at all far-fetched that Obama and his green minions in the Department of Agriculture might have just such a plan in mind, particularly given the fact that the government has already decided to ban drilling for oil on the Montana front.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sat Jul 07, 2012 3:53 pm

:hairfire:
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41178
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?

Post by Svartalf » Sat Jul 07, 2012 4:45 pm

maiforpeace wrote:Cuckoo!!!

All that bison methane is getting to the guy's head.
More likely he's been having fun with the pretty 'shrooms growing on the bizon patties.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51685
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 8-34-20
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?

Post by Tero » Sat Jul 07, 2012 4:52 pm

Seth wrote:
Tyrannical wrote:So, basically he is afraid the federal government is purposely moving endangered species onto oil rich land to prevent future drilling.
That sounds like something the Greens would try.
And that's exactly what they are doing. It's all part of the grand "rewilding" plan for the west, in which most of the land west of the Mississippi is deliberately depopulated of humans, who are sent to live in highly dense urban "gulags" while the critters are allowed to retake the rest of the land and humans are prohibited from entering their "natural habitat."

It's not at all far-fetched that Obama and his green minions in the Department of Agriculture might have just such a plan in mind, particularly given the fact that the government has already decided to ban drilling for oil on the Montana front.
Where do I sign up to support this plan?

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?

Post by mistermack » Sat Jul 07, 2012 5:39 pm

From what I've heard, the oil IS being extracted, faster than expected, and using hydraulic fracturing of the rocks.
Very little chance of a ban, when it's ongoing.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
amused
amused
Posts: 3873
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:04 pm
About me: Reinvention phase initiated
Contact:

Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?

Post by amused » Sat Jul 07, 2012 6:17 pm

Tero wrote:
Seth wrote:
Tyrannical wrote:So, basically he is afraid the federal government is purposely moving endangered species onto oil rich land to prevent future drilling.
That sounds like something the Greens would try.
And that's exactly what they are doing. It's all part of the grand "rewilding" plan for the west, in which most of the land west of the Mississippi is deliberately depopulated of humans, who are sent to live in highly dense urban "gulags" while the critters are allowed to retake the rest of the land and humans are prohibited from entering their "natural habitat."

It's not at all far-fetched that Obama and his green minions in the Department of Agriculture might have just such a plan in mind, particularly given the fact that the government has already decided to ban drilling for oil on the Montana front.
Where do I sign up to support this plan?
Which part? Putting people in gulags, or putting animals on top of oilfields?

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51685
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 8-34-20
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?

Post by Tero » Sat Jul 07, 2012 6:20 pm

Both. We have the gulags already. Nobody needs 10 acres and a pickup to live on.

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?

Post by Gallstones » Sat Jul 07, 2012 6:35 pm

Hey, hey, hey!
No you can't take over.

My couch
Image

The bench by the door
Image

:coffee:
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?

Post by Gallstones » Sat Jul 07, 2012 6:39 pm

Tero wrote:Both. We have the gulags already. Nobody needs 10 acres and a pickup to live on.
  • :what: :sulk:


BTW, we don't live on the pickup.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sat Jul 07, 2012 6:54 pm

Gallstones, could you start an "Independent Montana Movement" then? I'd send money.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51685
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 8-34-20
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?

Post by Tero » Sat Jul 07, 2012 8:16 pm

Good plan. Ship all the guns and pickups to Montana. When I get to be dictator, we don't allow pick ups, only vans. Then the craps stays mostly inside the vehicle other than the odd ladder falling off. No washing machines or couches, though.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 33 guests