I Didn’t Mean Muslim Ones!

Post Reply
User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: I Didn’t Mean Muslim Ones!

Post by maiforpeace » Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:06 pm

Warren, you're the one making the claim that there is political indoctrination of children going on in Massachussetts, in this case, that LGBT's families prominence in the current curriculum is crowding out heterosexual families and portraying them as odd and abnormal. That bigotry toward heterosexual families is openly supported by liberals in this teaching curriculum, apparently because of some anecdotal evidence of one gay teacher who was discovered to be a porn actor?

You have not provided one bit of evidence this may be true.

You honestly don't think that sounds the least bit crazed? :thinks:
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

cupper3
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 4:45 pm
Contact:

Re: I Didn’t Mean Muslim Ones!

Post by cupper3 » Wed Jul 11, 2012 1:32 am

The preponderance of lewd behavior at events such as 'gay pride' parades by participants as opposed to say, oh, almost any other type of parade, would be enough to at least formulate a hypothesis that being gay creates the proclivities towards such lewdness.
Science - Here are the facts, now what conclusions can we draw from them?

Religion - Here are the conclusions, now what facts can we find to support them?

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: I Didn’t Mean Muslim Ones!

Post by Jason » Wed Jul 11, 2012 1:39 am

cupper3 wrote:The preponderance of lewd behavior at events such as 'gay pride' parades by participants as opposed to say, oh, almost any other type of parade, would be enough to at least formulate a hypothesis that being gay creates the proclivities towards such lewdness.
The preponderance of lewd behaviour at events such as 'Mardi Gras' by participants as opposed to say, oh, Disney on Ice, would be enough to formulate a hypothesis that being drunk and/or in the presence of people were a feeling of uninhibited celebration prevails creates the proclivities towards such lewdness.

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: I Didn’t Mean Muslim Ones!

Post by hadespussercats » Wed Jul 11, 2012 1:43 am

PordFrefect wrote:
cupper3 wrote:The preponderance of lewd behavior at events such as 'gay pride' parades by participants as opposed to say, oh, almost any other type of parade, would be enough to at least formulate a hypothesis that being gay creates the proclivities towards such lewdness.
The preponderance of lewd behaviour at events such as 'Mardi Gras' by participants as opposed to say, oh, Disney on Ice, would be enough to formulate a hypothesis that being drunk and/or in the presence of people were a feeling of uninhibited celebration prevails creates the proclivities towards such lewdness.
Word.

Besides, parade participants are only a small portion of the gay community at large.
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74117
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: I Didn’t Mean Muslim Ones!

Post by JimC » Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:11 am

cupper3 wrote:The preponderance of lewd behavior at events such as 'gay pride' parades by participants as opposed to say, oh, almost any other type of parade, would be enough to at least formulate a hypothesis that being gay creates the proclivities towards such lewdness.
What some see as lewd, others would simply see as uninhibited exuberance. If minors and/or coercion are not involved, it should be no-one else's business.

In any case, this has little to do with the assertion that educational material suggesting the superiority of a gay lifestyle is a real presence in the US school system. No evidence for such an assertion has yet emerged...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41023
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: I Didn’t Mean Muslim Ones!

Post by Svartalf » Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:25 am

PordFrefect wrote:
cupper3 wrote:The preponderance of lewd behavior at events such as 'gay pride' parades by participants as opposed to say, oh, almost any other type of parade, would be enough to at least formulate a hypothesis that being gay creates the proclivities towards such lewdness.
The preponderance of lewd behaviour at events such as 'Mardi Gras' by participants as opposed to say, oh, Disney on Ice, would be enough to formulate a hypothesis that being drunk and/or in the presence of people were a feeling of uninhibited celebration prevails creates the proclivities towards such lewdness.
Or you could deduce that ice rink event are too cold to allow for nakedness and lewd behavior, or simply that disney are a bunch of stuck up prudes
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: I Didn’t Mean Muslim Ones!

Post by Tyrannical » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:25 am

pordfrefect wrote:You're equating pedophilia and homosexuality here? Or homosexual pornography? I'm not sure, it's difficult to follow this level of fail in an attempted argument. The Catholic priest's abuse ploy is a red herring - I'm not entirely sure the matter of sexual orientation of molesters in the church has ever been investigated properly, but I believe the reason boys are favoured may have something to do with accessibility and doctrine (priests specifically prohibited from women, apparently boys can be rationalized). However, this is entirely irrelevant.
Pedophile is prepubescent, most of the priest sex abuse cases involve post pubecent boys which makes it a gay/homosexual crime. But that upsets the gays, so they try to distort the facts.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: I Didn’t Mean Muslim Ones!

Post by Jason » Wed Jul 11, 2012 11:25 pm

Tyrannical wrote:
pordfrefect wrote:You're equating pedophilia and homosexuality here? Or homosexual pornography? I'm not sure, it's difficult to follow this level of fail in an attempted argument. The Catholic priest's abuse ploy is a red herring - I'm not entirely sure the matter of sexual orientation of molesters in the church has ever been investigated properly, but I believe the reason boys are favoured may have something to do with accessibility and doctrine (priests specifically prohibited from women, apparently boys can be rationalized). However, this is entirely irrelevant.
Pedophile is prepubescent, most of the priest sex abuse cases involve post pubecent boys which makes it a gay/homosexual crime. But that upsets the gays, so they try to distort the facts.
I'm not going to argue your dubious defence of an obvious red herring.

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: I Didn’t Mean Muslim Ones!

Post by mistermack » Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:51 am

Tyrannical wrote: Pedophile is prepubescent, most of the priest sex abuse cases involve post pubecent boys which makes it a gay/homosexual crime. But that upsets the gays, so they try to distort the facts.
It's a gay/homosexual crime, when the priest interferes with boys.
It's a straight/heterosexual crime when they interfere with girls.

I would be willing to bet that there is far more straight/heterosexual crime than gay.
Most often, it's fathers with their own daughters.
But that upsets the straights, so they try to distort the facts. Just like Tranny.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: I Didn’t Mean Muslim Ones!

Post by Tyrannical » Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:52 am

mistermack wrote:
Tyrannical wrote: Pedophile is prepubescent, most of the priest sex abuse cases involve post pubecent boys which makes it a gay/homosexual crime. But that upsets the gays, so they try to distort the facts.
I would be willing to bet that there is far more straight/heterosexual crime than gay.
Most often, it's fathers with their own daughters.
But that upsets the straights, so they try to distort the facts. Just like Tranny.
In raw numbers yes, but I'd be surprised if the percentage rate wasn't much higher in homosexuals.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: I Didn’t Mean Muslim Ones!

Post by Robert_S » Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:57 am

I wouldn't be surprised if a high percentage rate of the guesses people make about stuff turn out to be wrong.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: I Didn’t Mean Muslim Ones!

Post by mistermack » Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:24 pm

Tyrannical wrote: In raw numbers yes, but I'd be surprised if the percentage rate wasn't much higher in homosexuals.
I might be inclined to agree with you, but I suspect that much more of the heterosexual abuse goes unreported, than the homosexual. The reason would be the self blame that many victims feel.

Boys abused by a priest are more likely to feel angry and abused, when they grow up straight.

Girls abused by their fathers have the problem of damage to the family ties, if they report it, and self guilt, in the mistaken belief that they were partly to blame.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: I Didn’t Mean Muslim Ones!

Post by Hermit » Thu Jul 12, 2012 1:06 pm

Warren Dew wrote:what we see is that homosexual abuse seems more common than we'd expect; for example in the case of the Catholic church scandal, a large majority of the victims were of the same sex as the abusers.
cupper3 wrote:The preponderance of lewd behavior at events such as 'gay pride' parades by participants as opposed to say, oh, almost any other type of parade, would be enough to at least formulate a hypothesis that being gay creates the proclivities towards such lewdness.
Next: Proof that homosexual teachers are more likely to be paedophiles than heterosexual teachers. :roll:
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
redunderthebed
Commie Bastard
Posts: 6556
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:13 pm
About me: "Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate and wine in each hand, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"
Location: Port Lincoln Australia
Contact:

Re: I Didn’t Mean Muslim Ones!

Post by redunderthebed » Thu Jul 12, 2012 4:34 pm

Tyrannical wrote:
hadespussercats wrote:Warren-- were you saying that handouts and such by the school are where the same-sex couples are being portrayed so frequently? I'm wondering, if that's the case, is it possible, that there's been an initiative to push for parity by playing up same-sex parents because there's still so little depiction of that in textbooks and other older print sources-- especially considering that Massachusetts led the country in promoting same sex marriage, so materials made for schools nationally might not cover that.

Like a hypothetical school in Chinatown back in the day, where teachers might have tried to counteract the effect of all-white casts of people in textbooks by showing Asian families in handouts.

What do you think?
They could also do it by moving back to some Asian country where they are the majority and all the text book examples feature nice Asian families if that is soooo important to them. Non-slave descended Blacks and all other non-Whites voluntarily came to what they knew very well was a White majority nation.
Wow i have never heard the australian bogan attitude "dont like it here fuck off back to where you come from" so elequently put. :clap:
hadespussercats wrote:
Tyrannical wrote:
maiforpeace wrote:I'm not denying that in some cases political indoctrination has occurred (for example, the case where a teacher had her students do projects that were pro-Obama), but I don't consider including LGBT families in the larger narrative as being political indoctrination.
Teaching, or should I say insisting on tolerance IS indoctrination. We should be free to tolerate or abhor what we choose, especially when the new requirement of acceptance goes against established societal norms.
Wow, talk about politically correct! Now we have to tolerate the intolerant.
Welcome to the right-wing version of the civil rights movement. :ddpan:
hadespussercats wrote:
PordFrefect wrote:
cupper3 wrote:The preponderance of lewd behavior at events such as 'gay pride' parades by participants as opposed to say, oh, almost any other type of parade, would be enough to at least formulate a hypothesis that being gay creates the proclivities towards such lewdness.
The preponderance of lewd behaviour at events such as 'Mardi Gras' by participants as opposed to say, oh, Disney on Ice, would be enough to formulate a hypothesis that being drunk and/or in the presence of people were a feeling of uninhibited celebration prevails creates the proclivities towards such lewdness.
Word.

Besides, parade participants are only a small portion of the gay community at large.
Correct i get the vibe talking to gay people the over the top queeny types that populate these marches (which started as a civil rights march and now is just a tourist attraction and a way for nightclub operators to make money) are treated in much of the same way as your average middle of the road christian in relation to one that is foaming at the mouth fundie.
Warren Dew wrote:
JimC wrote:It would only be a rather deranged minority of gay extremists that would assert that, Warren, and they can simply be ignored, or treated with appropriate derision...
Not that easy to do when you're a six year old and the deranged one is a teacher three times your size.
That sounds like a sunday school teacher making you sing yes jesus loves me this i know because the bible tells me so. :roll:
Trolldor wrote:Ahh cardinal Pell. He's like a monkey after a lobotomy and three lines of cocaine.
The Pope was today knocked down at the start of Christmas mass by a woman who hopped over the barriers. The woman was said to be, "Mentally unstable."

Which is probably why she went unnoticed among a crowd of Christians.
Cormac wrote: One thing of which I am certain. The world is a better place with you in it. Stick around please. The universe will eventually get around to offing all of us. No need to help it in its efforts...

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: I Didn’t Mean Muslim Ones!

Post by Warren Dew » Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:25 am

redunderthebed wrote:
Warren Dew wrote:
JimC wrote:It would only be a rather deranged minority of gay extremists that would assert that, Warren, and they can simply be ignored, or treated with appropriate derision...
Not that easy to do when you're a six year old and the deranged one is a teacher three times your size.
That sounds like a sunday school teacher making you sing yes jesus loves me this i know because the bible tells me so. :roll:
I'd object to my kids being exposed to that, too.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests