...Hasn't Detroit always been a bit of a shit-hole, though?

Yeh but, what has Chicago got, that Detroit hasn't? My cousins live in Chicago, and I've never heard of anything like that where they live.Gawdzilla Sama wrote:Well, there's no reason to be in Michigan at all, so being in a dead town just ain't attractive.
Detroit was a monoculture, so when the reason died, so did the city. Chicago is diverse, and also the largest city in the central US.mistermack wrote:Yeh but, what has Chicago got, that Detroit hasn't? My cousins live in Chicago, and I've never heard of anything like that where they live.Gawdzilla Sama wrote:Well, there's no reason to be in Michigan at all, so being in a dead town just ain't attractive.
That doesn't explain why a place with cheap property, lots of labour looking for work, and free access to the US market, can't attract business.Gawdzilla Sama wrote: Detroit was a monoculture, so when the reason died, so did the city. Chicago is diverse, and also the largest city in the central US.
It improved from about 1994 to about 2004, then it all started crumbling again. The place is a dump.Făkünamę wrote:It used to be a bustling modern metropolis in the glory days of American automobile manufacturing, but following the oil crisis of the 1970s it's really gone to shit. It has been improving somewhat in recent years.
The socialist's dream. Evenly distribute the population to eliminate the distinction between cities and the countryside. It's one of the pillars of Marxist socialism.Audley Strange wrote:Yes. Eventually there will be no need for cities at all and we will all live in endless suburbia. close to the omni-distribution centres where we all work part-time, maintaining robots or delivering crap to each other.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 27 guests