Seth wrote:andrewclunn wrote:I support this legislation.
Do you support parental notification and consent for a minor to get an abortion or birth control products?
If not, why not? What's the difference between the dangers of tanning and the dangers of an abortion or STD's?
As far as condoms go, I don't think there can be any reasonable expectation of parental notification, but with things like prescription drugs or invasive procedures like abortion, I think there should be parental notification. Maybe I just say that because I'm a parent and I would approach these issues with a level of open-mindedness, so my child would reasonably expect a level of trust, decorum, and understanding, and would have nothing to fear. To be consistent, there would need to be some kind of parental notification, if not consent to most of these things.
However, the difference between the "dangers of abortion and STDs" and the "danger of tanning" is a real one conceptually, as "tanning" is a potentially hazardous behavior the child is subjecting themselves to for cosmetic benefit, while getting an abortion or getting treated for an STD is the child rectifying something that has already happened.