Click the owls!
Yay! More Harry Potter! (?)
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41246
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Yay! More Harry Potter! (?)
odds are
NOT
Though she's going to announce some new work milking more money out of the potterverse, likely some kind of prequel involving the younger selves of the older characters of the saga.
NOT
Though she's going to announce some new work milking more money out of the potterverse, likely some kind of prequel involving the younger selves of the older characters of the saga.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Yay! More Harry Potter! (?)
The Hogwarts years weren't the only days of Harry's life. As an auror I'm sure he has had more than one adventure since he polished off old Snake-face. And the second gen kids have their own lives to live. The fun may well continue.
And if you don't like Harry, at least don't whine about him.
And if you don't like Harry, at least don't whine about him.
Re: Yay! More Harry Potter! (?)
If it doesn't involve hot paparazzi bush-shots of Emma Watson, who cares?Svartalf wrote:odds are
NOT
Though she's going to announce some new work milking more money out of the potterverse, likely some kind of prequel involving the younger selves of the older characters of the saga.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41246
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Yay! More Harry Potter! (?)
Well, she swore high and low she would write no more harry potter, so if she writes more stuff about him, I'll have toilet paper printed with her pic made.
and I may be wrong, but I'm really having the feeling it will be a prequel rather than sequel.
and I'm fully entitled to whine after I bought all 7 books and never finished N°7 because her writing style and ability to produce a page turner deteriorated as the series advanced.
and I may be wrong, but I'm really having the feeling it will be a prequel rather than sequel.
and I'm fully entitled to whine after I bought all 7 books and never finished N°7 because her writing style and ability to produce a page turner deteriorated as the series advanced.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
Re: Yay! More Harry Potter! (?)
That you read any astounds me.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41246
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Yay! More Harry Potter! (?)
there have been bush shots of emma watson?Seth wrote:If it doesn't involve hot paparazzi bush-shots of Emma Watson, who cares?Svartalf wrote:odds are
NOT
Though she's going to announce some new work milking more money out of the potterverse, likely some kind of prequel involving the younger selves of the older characters of the saga.
I knew that girl had grown to be a rather vulgar specimen, but really, too short dresses and no panties really don't mix with papparazzi.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41246
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Yay! More Harry Potter! (?)
why? there was a time when I was a prolific reader you knowAnimavore wrote:That you read any astounds me.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Tigger
- 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 piccolos
- Posts: 15714
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:26 pm
- About me: It's not "about" me, it's exactly me.
- Location: location location.
Re: Yay! More Harry Potter! (?)
Some authors vanish up their own arses, don't they?Svartalf wrote:Well, she swore high and low she would write no more harry potter, so if she writes more stuff about him, I'll have toilet paper printed with her pic made.
and I may be wrong, but I'm really having the feeling it will be a prequel rather than sequel.
and I'm fully entitled to whine after I bought all 7 books and never finished N°7 because her writing style and ability to produce a page turner deteriorated as the series advanced.

Seth wrote:Fuck that, I like opening Pandora's box and shoving my tool inside it
- tattuchu
- a dickload of cocks
- Posts: 21890
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:59 pm
- About me: I'm having trouble with the trolley.
- Location: Marmite-upon-Toast, Wankershire
- Contact:
Re: Yay! More Harry Potter! (?)
Well I love the Harry Potter books, so if there's more then that's good news as far as I'm concerned. Certainly the Potter books were not High Art or Great Literature. But if you took them for what the were, they were great fun. Although Harry himself was probably the least interesting character in the books.
People think "queue" is just "q" followed by 4 silent letters.
But those letters are not silent.
They're just waiting their turn.
But those letters are not silent.
They're just waiting their turn.
Re: Yay! More Harry Potter! (?)
Svartalf wrote:why? there was a time when I was a prolific reader you knowAnimavore wrote:That you read any astounds me.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Yay! More Harry Potter! (?)
The books matured with the kids. Some of the readers, not so much.Svartalf wrote:Well, she swore high and low she would write no more harry potter, so if she writes more stuff about him, I'll have toilet paper printed with her pic made.
and I may be wrong, but I'm really having the feeling it will be a prequel rather than sequel.
and I'm fully entitled to whine after I bought all 7 books and never finished N°7 because her writing style and ability to produce a page turner deteriorated as the series advanced.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Yay! More Harry Potter! (?)
They're meant to be read as a person goes from age 11 to age 18, though I doubt an eleven year old would have the patience to wait for that timing.tattuchu wrote:Well I love the Harry Potter books, so if there's more then that's good news as far as I'm concerned. Certainly the Potter books were not High Art or Great Literature. But if you took them for what the were, they were great fun. Although Harry himself was probably the least interesting character in the books.
- Tigger
- 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 piccolos
- Posts: 15714
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:26 pm
- About me: It's not "about" me, it's exactly me.
- Location: location location.
Re: Yay! More Harry Potter! (?)
Nah, she started to take herself too seriously.Gawdzilla wrote:The books matured with the kids. Some of the readers, not so much.Svartalf wrote:Well, she swore high and low she would write no more harry potter, so if she writes more stuff about him, I'll have toilet paper printed with her pic made.
and I may be wrong, but I'm really having the feeling it will be a prequel rather than sequel.
and I'm fully entitled to whine after I bought all 7 books and never finished N°7 because her writing style and ability to produce a page turner deteriorated as the series advanced.

Seth wrote:Fuck that, I like opening Pandora's box and shoving my tool inside it
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Yay! More Harry Potter! (?)
Considering that she had the entire plot laid out in before book one was written, I doubt that. However, if you have examples...Tigger wrote:Nah, she started to take herself too seriously.Gawdzilla wrote:The books matured with the kids. Some of the readers, not so much.Svartalf wrote:Well, she swore high and low she would write no more harry potter, so if she writes more stuff about him, I'll have toilet paper printed with her pic made.
and I may be wrong, but I'm really having the feeling it will be a prequel rather than sequel.
and I'm fully entitled to whine after I bought all 7 books and never finished N°7 because her writing style and ability to produce a page turner deteriorated as the series advanced.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests