Slight glitch with that plan.Seth wrote: Now I'm going to configure my life so that I, like so may others, can be on the receiving end of government largess, as is my legal right.
The money has already been spent.
Slight glitch with that plan.Seth wrote: Now I'm going to configure my life so that I, like so may others, can be on the receiving end of government largess, as is my legal right.
That's okay, they'll just print more.rainbow wrote:Slight glitch with that plan.Seth wrote: Now I'm going to configure my life so that I, like so may others, can be on the receiving end of government largess, as is my legal right.
The money has already been spent.
Yes, I was reading quickly, but my statement is still true. Researchers with little to no firearm experience and an anti-gun bias before they even start doing research in their career, let alone this study.Blind groper wrote:That is very funny. Very, very funny.Collector1337 wrote:
I bet a bunch of English doctors have lots of firearm experience and aren't biased against guns at all...
Seth, who accuses me of ignorance, thinks the New England Journal of Medicine is British.
Much hilarity!
Yes. Drugs should be legalized.JimC wrote:Much of Mexico's murders can be attributed to the US in another sense; the insatiable demand for illegal drugs in the US fuels the vicious gang warfare in Mexico for control of this lucrative trade.Blind groper wrote:As I have said before, the high US murder rate has two causes. Availability of hand guns, and a sick gun culture, as clearly demonstrated by the vehemence of the pro gun debaters here.
Canada lacks the sickness of that gun culture. Even so, Canada has a higher firearms murder rate than other British Commonwealth nations, showing the southern influence.
The other nation adversely affected by the USA's lousy laws and gun culture is Mexico, which has a very high murder rate. A lot of the guns in Mexico, especially hand guns, have been traced to a US origin.
So you American gun nutters should be aware that your sick attitudes are killing Canadians and Mexicans as well as your own countrymen.
Legalising drugs in the US would have a massive effect on their own crime rate, and Mexico's as well.
This may well be a point that Collector and Seth could agree with...
Some ammo would make more sense.Făkünamę wrote:Free samplers of crack, meth, acid, and good old cocaine with each new AR-15! This is a limited time offer folks.
I have a some experience with a kitchen knife but that experience is quite sufficient to tell me people shouldn't be carrying them.Yes, I was reading quickly, but my statement is still true. Researchers with little to no firearm experience and an anti-gun bias before they even start doing research in their career, let alone this study.
Well said, Sir.MrJonno wrote: There is no requirement to be a psychopath to study psychopaths
And there's nothing that prevents a psychopath from studying psychopaths either.MrJonno wrote:I have a some experience with a kitchen knife but that experience is quite sufficient to tell me people shouldn't be carrying them.Yes, I was reading quickly, but my statement is still true. Researchers with little to no firearm experience and an anti-gun bias before they even start doing research in their career, let alone this study.
There is no requirement to be a psychopath to study psychopaths
But who studies the psychos studying the psychos? Where does it end?Seth wrote:And there's nothing that prevents a psychopath from studying psychopaths either.MrJonno wrote:I have a some experience with a kitchen knife but that experience is quite sufficient to tell me people shouldn't be carrying them.Yes, I was reading quickly, but my statement is still true. Researchers with little to no firearm experience and an anti-gun bias before they even start doing research in their career, let alone this study.
There is no requirement to be a psychopath to study psychopaths
Why would you carry around a kitchen knife? Not very practical.MrJonno wrote:I have a some experience with a kitchen knife but that experience is quite sufficient to tell me people shouldn't be carrying them.Yes, I was reading quickly, but my statement is still true. Researchers with little to no firearm experience and an anti-gun bias before they even start doing research in their career, let alone this study.
There is no requirement to be a psychopath to study psychopaths
Next thing you will be telling me you have an axe? (A British actress had to have a weeks training on using an axe as she had never seen one)Făkünamę wrote:I have three chainsaws (two small ones for limbing and a biggun for felling) and currently three firearms (I sold 4 over the winter and spring). :twisted:
Who doesn't?MrJonno wrote:Next thing you will be telling me you have an axe? (A British actress had to have a weeks training on using an axe as she had never seen one)Făkünamę wrote:I have three chainsaws (two small ones for limbing and a biggun for felling) and currently three firearms (I sold 4 over the winter and spring). :twisted:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests