An independent Scotland?

Post Reply
User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23746
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Clinton Huxley » Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:41 pm

klr wrote:
Clinton Huxley wrote:I see the Scotch Separatists are getting their knickers in a twist over NATO membership now.
Well, I think it's been the stated position for some time now that an independent Scotland will basically be an "unaligned" country with defence forces to match. I recall Salmond or one of the other SNP top brass saying as much when publicly questioned on the matter a few months ago.
Well, they want trident moved, which would be easier if Scotland were not in NATO but that could bring other problems.
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23746
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Clinton Huxley » Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:42 pm

Still, if we end up with an international border with Scotland, we've got a good place to build any new nuclear power stations...
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Jason » Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:43 pm

What will happen to the UK if Scotland becomes independent? The UK will have a little less money to spread around the south and Scotland will have a little more. That's about it.

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Jason » Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:44 pm

:hehe: I find it very amusing to see how vexed many of the 'English' ratz are becoming over the idea of an independent Scotland.

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41185
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Svartalf » Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:47 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:Still, if we end up with an international border with Scotland, we've got a good place to build any new nuclear power stations...
That close to the Lake District?

Oh, and you should give them the Tyne valley too.
Last edited by Svartalf on Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

ronmcd
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:13 pm
Location: Sunny Scotland
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by ronmcd » Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:47 pm

mistermack wrote: That's an easy one I can clear up now.
England won't be paying the subsidy to Scotland. And that saving goes on for ever.
But Scotland is not subsidised by England.
The biggest beneficiaries are Northern Ireland, Wales and the North East, which receive more than a fifth of their income as subsidies from the taxpayer.

Northern Ireland pays tax worth just 27.7 per cent of GDP generated by Northern Ireland. This compares to London, which pays tax equivalent to 45.2 per cent of GDP created in the capital.

Additionally, the analysis showed that regions where the level of tax paid was low as a proportion of GDP also used a higher proportion of GDP for state spending.

For some taxes, the regional differences are huge. The bulk of Stamp Duty Land Tax is paid in London and the South East. The 50p income tax rate is also largely a London and South East tax.

Overall, London provides a net subsidy of 20.3 per cent of GDP. Northern Ireland receives a net subsidy of 29.4 per cent, while Wales receives a subsidy of 26.0 per cent and the North East 22.2 per cent.

The figures will be relevent to the ongoing discussion of independence for Scotland. Scotland receives no net subsidy. Using and established Aberdeen University split of the oil and gas revenues - which gives Scotland 83 per cent - the oil and gas revenues exactly cancel out the fiscal transfers from the non oil sector.
http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/news ... ds-newsxml
The Ernst and Young report echoes the findings on Channel 4’s renowned factcheck analysis which confirms that outside London Scotland is the leading destination in the UK for Foreign Investment creating more high value jobs in 2010 than were created through foreign investment in London and that foreign investment in Scotland has continued to rise at a time when it is flatlining in other parts of the UK.
http://politicshome.com/uk/article/5621 ... ering.html

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by mistermack » Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:55 pm

ronmcd wrote: Scotland receives no net subsidy.[/i][/b] Using and established Aberdeen University split of the oil and gas revenues - which gives Scotland 83 per cent - the oil and gas revenues exactly cancel out the fiscal transfers from the non oil sector.
Fiscal transfers. A subsidy that matches the value of the oil revenues.
I never said net subsidy, I was clear that the overall effect was nil.

To make it clearer then, they won't be sending any money north. The Scottish govt will instead get oil revenues, which will dwindle over time.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

ronmcd
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:13 pm
Location: Sunny Scotland
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by ronmcd » Fri Oct 19, 2012 4:11 pm

mistermack wrote: Fiscal transfers. A subsidy that matches the value of the oil revenues.
I never said net subsidy, I was clear that the overall effect was nil.

To make it clearer then, they won't be sending any money north. The Scottish govt will instead get oil revenues, which will dwindle over time.
Okay, so we all agree that Scotland isn't subsidised then? Not sure why it keeps getting mentioned then. Some years Scotland would be in a better position than UK, sometimes worse. *shrugs*

ronmcd
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:13 pm
Location: Sunny Scotland
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by ronmcd » Fri Oct 19, 2012 4:15 pm

mistermack wrote: Fiscal transfers. A subsidy that matches the value of the oil revenues.
We are picking nits here, but it's not a subsidy. Scotland's position in terms of revenue and spending once geographic share of resources (ie the position post independence) taken into account means Scotland is a microcosm of the UK economy. I believe the current figures show that Scotland would be running a lower relative deficit than UK. So ... Scotland would be fine.

The commonly used subsidy claims are about scaring people, and they arent true.

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23746
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Clinton Huxley » Fri Oct 19, 2012 4:27 pm

Just so I don't forget.

http://bettertogether.net/
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
Red Celt
Humanist Misanthrope
Posts: 1349
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 8:30 pm
About me: Crow Philosopher
Location: Fife, Scotland
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Red Celt » Fri Oct 19, 2012 5:26 pm

Image
Image

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41185
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Svartalf » Fri Oct 19, 2012 5:32 pm

Take off St Pat's and it's gonna be perfect
f
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23746
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Clinton Huxley » Tue Oct 23, 2012 2:34 pm

Seems Salmonella may have "misspoke" re his legal advice
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
Santa_Claus
Your Imaginary Friend
Posts: 1985
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:06 pm
About me: Ho! Ho! Ho!
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Santa_Claus » Tue Oct 23, 2012 2:54 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:Seems Salmonella may have "misspoke" re his legal advice
Not sure what this comment relates to......

But Salmond would be well aware that on stuff like this you only get legal advice when you already know what it will say - and can live with it (not the same as it all being 110% what you want - but sometimes better if not as simply looks better). But getting your opponents to focus on the minutiae is a useful tactic whilst you concentrate on the big picture.

The legal side of whether Scotland goes independent is only window dressing (for all sides) - big boys rules means Countries (and wannabee countries) can do WTF they like, if they can back it up with boots on the ground.
I am Leader of all The Atheists in the world - FACT.

Come look inside Santa's Hole :ninja:

You want to hear the truth about Santa Claus???.....you couldn't handle the truth about Santa Claus!!!

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23746
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Clinton Huxley » Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:03 pm

Santa_Claus wrote:
Clinton Huxley wrote:Seems Salmonella may have "misspoke" re his legal advice
Not sure what this comment relates to......

But Salmond would be well aware that on stuff like this you only get legal advice when you already know what it will say - and can live with it (not the same as it all being 110% what you want - but sometimes better if not as simply looks better). But getting your opponents to focus on the minutiae is a useful tactic whilst you concentrate on the big picture.

The legal side of whether Scotland goes independent is only window dressing (for all sides) - big boys rules means Countries (and wannabee countries) can do WTF they like, if they can back it up with boots on the ground.
Ah, assertions.

Turns out there was a god reason Salmond didn't want to release his legal advice re EU membership post independence, he hadn't asked for any. Makes you wonder where else the Scotch Separatists are cutting corners.
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests