Fail

[leo-rcc]

I've visited the most well known concentration camps and death camps as well as some SS prisons. I wanted to find out how a mass genocide of these epic proportions could have even been conceived, let alone implemented.

So far the best explanation I've heard and figured is that it is due to apathy. The general population didn't give a shit about the plight of the Jews, because after years and years of propaganda (the Russians even worse than the Germans I might add) jews were considered the lowest of the low. The rats in the rodent family. No one would shed a tear over them if they were gone.

I believe that awareness should be held up in every generation so this kind of apathy does not occur in future generations.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Lozzer, you might want to consider that people carry a "tool kit" with them, and that something comes out when it's needed. You can''t have all your tools in hand at the same time, that's why Gawd gave us boxes. So, just because I'm not thinking about something right now doesn't mean it's nowhere to be found in my tool kit, just that I don't have it out right now.

I just noticed the potential for in the above. Good luck with that.

[devogue]

Lozzer, you might want to consider that people carry a "tool kit" with them, and that something comes out when it's needed. You can''t have all your tools in hand at the same time, that's why Gawd gave us boxes. So, just because I'm not thinking about something right now doesn't mean it's nowhere to be found in my tool kit, just that I don't have it out right now.

I just noticed the potential for in the above. Good luck with that.

That post is perfect if read with a Mr Garrison accent.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Lozzer, you might want to consider that people carry a "tool kit" with them, and that something comes out when it's needed. You can''t have all your tools in hand at the same time, that's why Gawd gave us boxes. So, just because I'm not thinking about something right now doesn't mean it's nowhere to be found in my tool kit, just that I don't have it out right now.

I just noticed the potential for in the above. Good luck with that.

That post is perfect if read with a Mr Garrison accent.

Is he the one with Mr Slave? (Sorry, rarely watch that.)

[leo-rcc]

Lozzer, you might want to consider that people carry a "tool kit" with them, and that something comes out when it's needed. You can''t have all your tools in hand at the same time, that's why Gawd gave us boxes. So, just because I'm not thinking about something right now doesn't mean it's nowhere to be found in my tool kit, just that I don't have it out right now.

I just noticed the potential for in the above. Good luck with that.

That post is perfect if read with a Mr Garrison accent.

Is he the one with Mr Slave? (Sorry, rarely watch that.)

Yes the one that had sex with richard Dawkins.

</derail>

[charlou]

I am avoiding personalising this, though your arrogant assumptions about what does and does not occupy people thoughts and concerns deserves a swift kick up the arse.

>snip<

You put your foot in the dogshit every chance you get.

I would like to politely invite you to go fuck yourself until it shakes your brains up enough for them to be of some use to you..and perhaps even the rest of us.

Keep it civil, Rum - argue the points not the person.

I am avoiding personalising this

Please try harder.

[Lozzer]

Rumerton is a silly billy, he doesn't know how to keep it civil because he's high. High on crack1!!!!!

Oh baby! I went there! Hows that for a personal attack, you molester of free thought?

[charlou]

you molester of free thought?

Who, me?


People can express their thoughts on any subject, just not descend into resorting to personal slanging to do so.

And, yes, I know personal slanging is an expression of thought, but the reason it's discouraged is so that others feel free to express their thoughts and engage in discourse on any subject without fear of personal attack - to prevent discussion descending into unproductive arguments and derails.

[Xamonas Chegwé]

you molester of free thought?

Who, me?


People can express their thoughts on any subject, just not descend into resorting to personal slanging to do so.

And, yes, I know personal slanging is an expression of thought, but the reason it's discouraged is so that others feel free to express their thoughts and engage in discourse on any subject without fear of personal attack - to prevent discussion descending into unproductive arguments and derails.

Very good answer - up to the part about derails!

But yeah. If your argument has merit, it can be made to stand without resorting to personal attacks.

[charlou]

Very good answer - up to the part about derails!

I'm talking about unproductive, insulting derails here, you bollox

[Xamonas Chegwé]

Very good answer - up to the part about derails!

I'm talking about unproductive, insulting derails here, you bollox

Appo-polly-loggies. It wasn't clear that the adjective 'unproductive' was meant to adhere to both 'arguments' and 'derails'. I completely take your point that the vast majority of the derails that happen here are thoroughly productive. Err... then agin... I'll get my coat!

[charlou]

I completely take your point that the vast majority of the derails that happen here are thoroughly productive. Err... then agin... I'll get my coat!

Yes ... well ... errr ... I'll get mine ...

[Lozzer]

Ignore my last post, I was inebriated

[Don't Panic]

Ignore my last post, I was inebriated

Loz, to me you're always inebriated.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Appo-polly-loggies. It wasn't clear that the adjective 'unproductive' was meant to adhere to both 'arguments' and 'derails'. I completely take your point that the vast majority of the derails that happen here are thoroughly productive. Err... then agin... I'll get my coat!

Derails are verboten!