Audley Strange wrote:rEvolutionist wrote:And this is why I am always on at Coit when he starts casting aspersions (or at least appears to be, like here) on poor and disadvantaged people. So much hate and disgust is reserved for poor people doing wrong as opposed to rich people doing wrong by conservatives. I just don't understand how a rationalist can have that skewed a perception.
This post here.
You deliberately point out you always target Coit even when you think or imagine he is casting aspersions on poor or disadvantaged people. From your inference you go on to exaggerate his positions and worldview into something you can vilify and then go on to claim that his perception is skewed but yours somehow which seems exactly the opposite, is not. And you do this over and over again.
And once again, how does this in anyway make what you said regarding my post factual or cogent? I comment when I perceive Coito (and anyone) to be disparaging disadvantaged people. Tick. I "exaggerate his positions"? Once again, produce the evidence or shut the fuck up. You are a fucking lame duck. Put up or shut up. Or is this going to be another case of you casting aspersions on me and then when the heat gets applied you wilt and slink away?
I state my opinion and if you want to nitpick on and on and on about it fine but don't expect me to debate or discuss anything reasonably with you, because despite your constant claims about rationality, you are one of the most irrational people I've witnessed on this forum.
Well then it should be easy for you to debate me and squash my points. You've never even fucking tried. Why is that?
Too quick to take offence, assume the worst of your rivals, insult them then play the victim.
As I've said to others, this fascination with my interactions with Coit and a tiny few others (perhaps 2 others), is typical hyperbolic drama shit that this forum seems to deal in. I have debates about ideas and respectful differences of opinions in dozens of threads here every week. But you and a small bunch of drama queens prefer to focus on my blow up with Coit, despite knowing that I very seriously believe that he is a first class bigot and one who dished that bigotry out to me. Now you might disagree with my assessment of what went on there, and that's fine (see, I don't need to abuse you or attack you for disagreeing with me; listening to the hyperbole some of you like to spew, this should be a minor fucking miracle). But you should at least try and understand where I am coming from. I most certainly don't abuse people who I disagree with or have differences of opinion. If you think that, then you haven't been following my forum interactions properly. I abuse one or two people and their ideas, as I think they are repulsive and not worthy of very much, if any, respect. Big fucking deal. Go find another hobby horse to get your drama kicks.
You want evidence? Look at your fucking posting record. Angry, filled with personal invective and constant uncharitable readings and pre-formed assumption.
Wow, fail. Look up evidence in the dictionary, champ. Are you aware of how ridiculous your reply is? How can you claim a superiority in rationality when you provide an unevidenced assertion as evidence of an unevidenced assertion?
You are a perfect candidate for A+.
Says the guy who hasn't provided ONE SINGLE PIECE OF EVIDENCE yet.
I tried to give you the benefit of the doubt, thought that given the fact we have for years managed to discuss and debate things without you coming across like an angry brat, that you might actually have the decency to accept that not everything needs to be necessitated by charts and graphs. I thought we might have some form of mutual respect. Clearly I was wrong.
"Clearly". Where is the respect on show when you claim that I am brat and akin to an Apeluster? Where is the respect when you claim that I am a kid and lack character? Are you for fucking real? Where is the respect when you claim repeatedly that I am irrational (or not very rational)? You are basically just an obnoxious opinion machine. You say stuff that you know will ruffle feathers. In my honest, and no longer respectful opinion, you are like a hipster. So desperate to appear different that you come across as patently ridiculous. Keep up the good work.
You, however, never are are you? Thus being a boring arrogant angry never-wrong you join the list amongst such luminaries as Red Celt and Scheibster.
As i've pointed out many times to coit, I regularly admit that I am wrong, and regularly apologise if I have been too offensive when wrong. You would actually know this if you looked at my posting history, instead of sprouting empty rhetoric in aid of winning an argument you aren't even willing to put the most minimum effort into prosecuting. To say what you've said is simply offensive. But you aren't interested an actual evidenced debate. You are trying to present a rhetorical prosecution, for what ends, I'm not sure. I assume it is because I've taken some of your bollocky statements to task in the past.
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
