I suppose I don't view shame at all in terms of body image (embarrassment maybe... but not shame), with that aside why do you believe it's installed rather than native? We are very much group animals, most group animals have structure and some emotional connection to that structure. I'd find it less plausible that we had no native emotion serving a shame purpose (if there is one...?). You use remorse - I can't separate these at all, except by audience, but then, a bit like Hades describes I can do shame all on my own anyway!Gawdzilla » wrote:Well, I tend to group them into "native" and "installed". Shame is not native, but remorse is.hadespussercats » wrote:Ah. There's a lot of subtle gradations in these negative feelings, huh?Gawdzilla » wrote:I would call that remorse, not shame.hadespussercats » wrote:I remember when my dad told me never to be ashamed of my body. He said, "Look at me, my body sure isn't beautiful, but hey-- it's what I've got." Said with a sense of "Life goes on-- don't miss out because you don't think you look right."Gawdzilla » wrote:I don't believe shame is anything but an instilled attitude. Young children happily run around naked until they get enough shocked attitudes thrown at them.
I don't think shame about bodies is ever a good thing. ( Of course, it's a hard standard to keep, when my middle currently looks like a loaf of uncooked bread.)
Feeling ashamed for hurting someone, though-- or treating someone poorly, or acting negligently and causing an accident-- that sort of thing... I think a little shame in those circumstances is appropriate.
Thinking again, perhaps shame reflects a past audience but requires an audience where as remorse does not? I'd still find it a stretch to see us evolving to live in groups with complex social structure without equally evolving some emotion to back that structure up.