There was a similar article in the New Scientist about 6 months ago too.Gawdzilla wrote:There was a recent article in SciAm about ways to feed 60 billion people with current resources. It's sounded reasonable, but then I haven't read any articles from opposing view points.Rum wrote:I left it before the end..
The picture is terribly bleak and all I can say is I am glad I am 59 years old.
Paging Malthus!
The major problem I see is that the rich are able to wield the power to control water sources, or pay for expensive desalination. The poor can't afford desalination. But, there are millions/billions of people dying in poverty every year anyway, due to lack of water and food. A water/food famine of some kind would presumable kill off more, but then we'd just be back to a slightly lower population level.
Until the whole planet is educated in the way the programme suggested, there will always be third world countries that have massively expanding populations, and thus million of people dying. I can't conceive of a time when the whole world will be educated like that. It's sadly a very long way off and lots of things could happen to knock back any progress in that area.