I noticed that the sample size of the tea party affiliated was less than one third the size of the non-affiliated. It seems like political alignment is a pretty poor indicator of scientific literacy, especially when compared to education level or religiosity.PsychoSerenity wrote:Where the professor says "the relationship is trivially small", and it also becomes apparent that due to the small sample size this correlation has less significance than the one that shows science comprehension decreases as political outlooks move in the rightward direction.Warren Dew wrote: http://cnsnews.com/mrctv-blog/matt-vesp ... EWuIe.dpuf
Which also contains a link to the professor's blog entry.
So why didn't you link directly to that rather than the quote-mining article?
Tea Party members have better scientific comprehension
- subversive science
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 6:54 pm
- Location: in a lab, somewhere...
- Contact:
Re: Tea Party members have better scientific comprehension
- Warren Dew
- Posts: 3781
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
- Location: Somerville, MA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Tea Party members have better scientific comprehension
It was people randomly picked across the U.S.mistermack wrote:If this study was done of Yale students, then it's hardly representative.
- Warren Dew
- Posts: 3781
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
- Location: Somerville, MA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Tea Party members have better scientific comprehension
Yup. I think we can conclude:piscator wrote:And some of the statistically literate readers here may note the [negative] r-value and p-value of that study are slightly stronger than the same measures of the Tea Party study...In this dataset, I found that there is a small correlation (r = -0.05, p = 0.03) between the science comprehension measure and a left-right political outlook measure, Conservrepub, which aggregates liberal-conservative ideology and party self-identification. The sign of the correlation indicates that science comprehension decreases as political outlooks move in the rightward direction--i.e., the more "liberal" and "Democrat," the more science comprehending.
Tea Party > left >> RINO aka "moderate" right
.
- Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51720
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 8-34-20
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Tea Party members have better scientific comprehension
Tea Party vs non tea party. What kind of comparison is that?
- pErvinalia
- On the good stuff
- Posts: 60983
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
- About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
- Location: dystopia
- Contact:
Re: Tea Party members have better scientific comprehension
Ian wrote:Give Warren a break, guys. The teabaggers are having a very rough day. They need to grasp at something to get their spirits up, even if it's bogus.

I also note that Seth has been VERY quiet on the budget/debt-ceiling deal.

Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
Re: Tea Party members have better scientific comprehension
FIXEDWarren Dew wrote:Yup. I presuppose:piscator wrote:And some of the statistically literate readers here may note the [negative] r-value and p-value of that study are slightly stronger than the same measures of the Tea Party study...In this dataset, I found that there is a small correlation (r = -0.05, p = 0.03) between the science comprehension measure and a left-right political outlook measure, Conservrepub, which aggregates liberal-conservative ideology and party self-identification. The sign of the correlation indicates that science comprehension decreases as political outlooks move in the rightward direction--i.e., the more "liberal" and "Democrat," the more science comprehending.
Tea Party > left >> RINO aka "moderate" right
.

- Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51720
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 8-34-20
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Tea Party members have better scientific comprehension
He converted all his money to silver and has been busy building a concrete vault for it.rEvolutionist wrote:Ian wrote:Give Warren a break, guys. The teabaggers are having a very rough day. They need to grasp at something to get their spirits up, even if it's bogus.![]()
I also note that Seth has been VERY quiet on the budget/debt-ceiling deal.
- cronus
- Black Market Analyst
- Posts: 18122
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:09 pm
- About me: Illis quos amo deserviam
- Location: United Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: Tea Party members have better scientific comprehension
Seems there is adequate elite suppression amongst the Republicans to survive this coming socio-economic collapse...Democratic states, in this brave new dollar-less world, will start with the best of good intentions but likely devolve into small tribal entities with no collective purpose but willing to fight amongst themselves for scarce resources. 

What will the world be like after its ruler is removed?
Re: Tea Party members have better scientific comprehension
Mix that last V8 with vodka, Max.
- Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
- Contact:
Re: Tea Party members have better scientific comprehension
Naw, he is building the vault out of silver, and will then paint it black. Clever disguiseTero wrote:He converted all his money to silver and has been busy building a concrete vault for it.rEvolutionist wrote:Ian wrote:Give Warren a break, guys. The teabaggers are having a very rough day. They need to grasp at something to get their spirits up, even if it's bogus.![]()
I also note that Seth has been VERY quiet on the budget/debt-ceiling deal.

A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 74306
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Tea Party members have better scientific comprehension
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:I think it's just down to them being rich and getting a decent education. That they choose to believe Hebrew mythology over what they are taught says more about them than how much attention they paid in science class.Scrumple wrote:Doesn't surprise me. Believing in religion is rather like believing in black swans. There's that study from way back where mathematicians had a greater belief in god than most too. If you take away the religious aspect I should say the Tea Party types with their prepper attitude, interest in money etc are more rational than the democrat 'fairness and niceness' brigade.

As long as the science in question is standard physics and chemistry, and doesn't edge too far into evolution or climate science...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
- rainbow
- Posts: 13795
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
- About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
Where ever you are, Goethe was a Poet. - Location: Africa
- Contact:
Re: Tea Party members have better scientific comprehension
Since psychology isn't a proper science, how can they comment on 'scientific comprehension'?
I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4
BArF−4
- mistermack
- Posts: 15093
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
- About me: Never rong.
- Contact:
Re: Tea Party members have better scientific comprehension
I don't find the result surprising. It's a tiny effect, if it's genuine, and it means nothing.
If you did a similar study on the scientific comprehension of males and females, you would almost certainly find a much bigger difference. And if you did a study of tea-party members, you would probably find more males than females.
That in itself could account for the difference.
If you did a similar study on the scientific comprehension of males and females, you would almost certainly find a much bigger difference. And if you did a study of tea-party members, you would probably find more males than females.
That in itself could account for the difference.
Good point.rainbow wrote:Since psychology isn't a proper science, how can they comment on 'scientific comprehension'?
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 19 guests