FBM wrote:Good point, Warren. I wonder how many people IRL are so demanding of evidence or actually take the time to deeply examine the beliefs of their peers.
Clearly less than 10%, or beliefs based on empirical observation and logic would have taken over, right? At least that's what this research would say.
I would guess that maybe 5% test and form beliefs based on empirical data and objective logic - and it's not just the beliefs of their peers that are tested, but their own beliefs as well, since one can learn new facts that may require reanalysis of existing beliefs.
Then there's the issue of logic. Logic requires not just an attitude, but a certain level of intelligence - a level which may vary depending on the complexity of the problem. There are probably issues on which we cannot form a fully rational belief, because no human being is smart enough to deduce the truth given currently known facts.