Is the BBC hiding paedophiles?

devogue · Post by **devogue** » Sun Oct 28, 2012 10:17 am

Cliff Richard is brilliant. Hope he doesn't get pulled in to this scandal!

Post by **klr** » Sun Oct 28, 2012 10:19 am

devogue wrote:Cliff Richard is brilliant. Hope he doesn't get pulled in to this scandal!

Tongue firmly in cheek there.

I'm afraid old Harry Webb is beyond any suspicion.

devogue · Post by **devogue** » Sun Oct 28, 2012 10:27 am

klr wrote:
devogue wrote:Cliff Richard is brilliant. Hope he doesn't get pulled in to this scandal!
Tongue firmly in cheek there.

I'm afraid old Harry Webb is beyond any suspicion.

Yes.

Post by **John_fi_Skye** » Sun Oct 28, 2012 10:41 am

I always thought Gary Glitter was a joke, marketing himself at 10-14-year-old girls because that was his niche market. I didn't realise he was trying to appeal to them so he could shag them.

I always despised him.

Post by **John_fi_Skye** » Sun Oct 28, 2012 10:52 am

mistermack wrote:While I never liked Jimmy Savile, there's something very fishy about all these claims.
Not one single official claim while he's alive, and yet forty or fifty now he's dead. ( having coincidentally left millions in his estate ).

If I was a girl who had EVER been around Jimmy Savile, I would now be telling of horrendous abuse. I like the smell of money just as much as the next girl.

How strange, nobody complained when he was alive. He must have had super powers.

You're as cynical as I am, Mr Mack. That was exactly my thinking. There's a line in a Scottish song about the oil industry, "....an awfy smell o money", and that was what started going through my head as soon as this blew up. And the family, who originally said, "lay off - he's not long dead", are now saying how sympathetic they are to everybody, in the hope that it'll diminish the amount of cash that the courts direct away out of his estate.

Doubtless, there will be people who've been damaged by what Savile did, but I don't know how the courts will differentiate between them and those who just smell compensation. And if the losers end up being people who have to wait even longer for surgery because NHS budgets are hit by punitive damages, I shall think that stinks.

Post by **cronus** » Sun Oct 28, 2012 11:10 am

Cliff Richard is quite possible, what about Gervais who like Saville prefers intellectual subnormals for close company?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fdFHIGW ... re=related[/youtube]

devogue · Post by **devogue** » Sun Oct 28, 2012 11:11 am

Horrific Jimmy Savile photo (honestly NSFW)...

Trigger Warning!!!1! :

Post by **John_fi_Skye** » Sun Oct 28, 2012 1:58 pm

Ghastly. Sickest thing I've seen for a while.

Post by **klr** » Sun Oct 28, 2012 2:06 pm

John_fi_Skye wrote:Ghastly. Sickest thing I've seen for a while.

Now you know never to click on a spoiler button in a devogue post. A hard-earned lessson ...

Post by **Santa_Claus** » Sun Oct 28, 2012 2:31 pm

My initial thinking was Gary Glitter being arrested was very lazy policing.........

.......but then I recalled that in the UK he has "only" ever been convicted of Kiddy Porn on his PC (albeit I think his Vietnamese adventures also got him on the UK Sex Offenders register). Looking back perhaps surprising that the Police never found any evidence of kiddie fiddling in the UK - but perhaps there was and it was intentionally never followed up as folks did not want to (formally) find out who was "in the gang", because then they would have to dp something about it.........

.....maybe this time the Police (a different generation?) not so afeared of lifting a few stones (and the folks concerned no longer so well connected / protected?) - and know which stones to lift.

Either that or they are just being lazy!

Post by **Cormac** » Sun Oct 28, 2012 3:13 pm

devogue wrote:Horrific Jimmy Savile photo (honestly NSFW)...

Trigger Warning!!!1! :

You are a deeply bad man Dev.

And I admire you for it!

Post by **Arse** » Mon Oct 29, 2012 6:16 pm

I can see this rapidly getting out of hand and turning into a witch hunt.

Post by **Rum** » Mon Oct 29, 2012 6:34 pm

Arse wrote:I can see this rapidly getting out of hand and turning into a witch hunt.

I think there is that risk. Back in the 70s attitudes were really quite different. Rightly or wrongly there were thousands of 15 year old girls who would have been thrilled for a bit of 'fun' with some of those guys. Which is not to dismiss those who were exploited of course. But if every DJ who fiddled with a 15 year old is in the firing line I suspect there will be a long line of them!

Post by **Santa_Claus** » Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:41 am

Arse wrote:I can see this rapidly getting out of hand and turning into a witch hunt.

and you say that almost like it would be a bad thing.

dunno about your neighbourhood, but around these parts not so much of a witch problem nowadays

.

Post by **mistermack** » Tue Oct 30, 2012 11:17 pm

What is the scariest Jimmy Savile picture to date?
I've noticed that there is an unannounced competition to find the horriblest photo of him in the press.

This is a goodie, but there have been some excellent ones out there :
Is it my imagination, or has someone made him a bit redder for effect in this one?

rationalia.com

Is the BBC hiding paedophiles?

Re: Is the BBC hiding paedophiles?

Re: Is the BBC hiding paedophiles?

Re: Is the BBC hiding paedophiles?

Re: Is the BBC hiding paedophiles?

Re: Is the BBC hiding paedophiles?

Re: Is the BBC hiding paedophiles?

Re: Is the BBC hiding paedophiles?

Re: Is the BBC hiding paedophiles?

Re: Is the BBC hiding paedophiles?

Re: Is the BBC hiding paedophiles?

Re: Is the BBC hiding paedophiles?

Re: Is the BBC hiding paedophiles?

Re: Is the BBC hiding paedophiles?

Re: Is the BBC hiding paedophiles?

Re: Is the BBC hiding paedophiles?

Who is online