Labour won with 41.2% of the votes? That means 58.8% didn't vote for them! And you call that democracy?Pappa wrote:
I'm considering breaking my habit of spoiling my ballot paper for this very reason. I don't identify with the Lib Dems fully, but more so than any of the other 3 main parties. My seat is a marginal, 2005 was pretty close:
Labour 41.2
Tory 37.3
Lib Dem 13.0
Plaid 5.1
UK Independence Party 1.8
Liberal Party 1.3
Socialist Labour Party 0.3
.
The UK election thread
- Deep Sea Isopod
- Bathynomus giganteus
- Posts: 7806
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:09 am
- Location: Gods blind spot.
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
I run with scissors. It makes me feel dangerous 



- Jack Rawlinson
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:48 pm
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
Well... yeah. Because, you know, there weren't just two parties in the election, remember? You know how "majority" doesn't mean "more than 50%" in that circumstance?Deep Sea Isopod wrote:
Labour won with 41.2% of the votes? That means 58.8% didn't vote for them! And you call that democracy?
- Deep Sea Isopod
- Bathynomus giganteus
- Posts: 7806
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:09 am
- Location: Gods blind spot.
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
Jack Rawlinson wrote:Well... yeah. Because, you know, there weren't just two parties in the election, remember? You know how "majority" doesn't mean "more than 50%" in that circumstance?Deep Sea Isopod wrote:
Labour won with 41.2% of the votes? That means 58.8% didn't vote for them! And you call that democracy?
Just trying to make Labour look like fascists.
I run with scissors. It makes me feel dangerous 



- Jack Rawlinson
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:48 pm
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
Deep Sea Isopod wrote:Jack Rawlinson wrote:Well... yeah. Because, you know, there weren't just two parties in the election, remember? You know how "majority" doesn't mean "more than 50%" in that circumstance?Deep Sea Isopod wrote:
Labour won with 41.2% of the votes? That means 58.8% didn't vote for them! And you call that democracy?
Just trying to make Labour look like fascists.
Hell, you do that by pointing to their record on civil liberties. :-)
- RuleBritannia
- Cupid is a cunt!
- Posts: 1630
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
- About me: About you
- Location: The Machine
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
Check out the latest YouGov opinion polls, the Lib Dems have over taken Labour:
Conservative: 33%
Labour: 28%
Liberal Democrat: 30%
Others: 9%

Conservative: 33%
Labour: 28%
Liberal Democrat: 30%
Others: 9%

RuleBritannia © MMXI
- AshtonBlack
- Tech Monkey

- Posts: 7773
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:01 pm
- Location: <insert witty joke locaction here>
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
Fucking hell.
Yes, there are policies that the Lib Dems (and I quit the party because of it) have that I do not agree with. At this stage in my life, I just want the least corrupt. Even if power corrupts them, the Lib Dems fit that bill.
Yes, there are policies that the Lib Dems (and I quit the party because of it) have that I do not agree with. At this stage in my life, I just want the least corrupt. Even if power corrupts them, the Lib Dems fit that bill.
10 Fuck Off
20 GOTO 10
Ashton Black wrote:"Dogma is the enemy, not religion, per se. Rationality, genuine empathy and intellectual integrity are anathema to dogma."
- RuleBritannia
- Cupid is a cunt!
- Posts: 1630
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
- About me: About you
- Location: The Machine
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
But you could argue that if all you're after as a politican is power then the Lib Dems aren't the best choice for attaining it, as the perception is that only Labour or the Tories can win.AshtonBlack wrote:Fucking hell.
Yes, there are policies that the Lib Dems (and I quit the party because of it) have that I do not agree with. At this stage in my life, I just want the least corrupt. Even if power corrupts them, the Lib Dems fit that bill.
RuleBritannia © MMXI
- AshtonBlack
- Tech Monkey

- Posts: 7773
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:01 pm
- Location: <insert witty joke locaction here>
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
I don't think there are absolutes, I'm not naive to think that the head honcho's of the Lib Dems won't be corrupted by power. THey are just the least unpalatable to my liberal, secular, humanist philosophies and I like the idea they could shake things up a bit. (Underdog liking?)RuleBritannia wrote:But you could argue that if all you're after as a politican is power then the Lib Dems aren't the best choice for attaining it, as the perception is that only Labour or the Tories can win.AshtonBlack wrote:Fucking hell.
Yes, there are policies that the Lib Dems (and I quit the party because of it) have that I do not agree with. At this stage in my life, I just want the least corrupt. Even if power corrupts them, the Lib Dems fit that bill.
10 Fuck Off
20 GOTO 10
Ashton Black wrote:"Dogma is the enemy, not religion, per se. Rationality, genuine empathy and intellectual integrity are anathema to dogma."
- Thinking Aloud
- Page Bottomer
- Posts: 20111
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:56 am
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
+something to some posts somewhere.
My interest in politics is next to zero usually, but I'm pretty much unimpressed by the two main parties these days. Throwing a vote away is not an option for me - I may as well use it to make a point of showing support for another option. I've never understood the "my constituency has always voted X so there's no point trying to change it, even though X are a bunch of arses these days" attitude. That guarantees that nothing will ever change.
Of course, ultimately the election will be decided by what the editor of The Sun choses to print on his front page on the morning of polling day. That's usually how it works.
My interest in politics is next to zero usually, but I'm pretty much unimpressed by the two main parties these days. Throwing a vote away is not an option for me - I may as well use it to make a point of showing support for another option. I've never understood the "my constituency has always voted X so there's no point trying to change it, even though X are a bunch of arses these days" attitude. That guarantees that nothing will ever change.
Of course, ultimately the election will be decided by what the editor of The Sun choses to print on his front page on the morning of polling day. That's usually how it works.
http://thinking-aloud.co.uk/ Musical Me
- AshtonBlack
- Tech Monkey

- Posts: 7773
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:01 pm
- Location: <insert witty joke locaction here>
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
Won't be the lib dems then, they don't pay enough... (oh sorry did I suggest that deals for media coverage would be done?) I mean erm, something else.Thinking Aloud wrote:+something to some posts somewhere.
My interest in politics is next to zero usually, but I'm pretty much unimpressed by the two main parties these days. Throwing a vote away is not an option for me - I may as well use it to make a point of showing support for another option. I've never understood the "my constituency has always voted X so there's no point trying to change it, even though X are a bunch of arses these days" attitude. That guarantees that nothing will ever change.
Of course, ultimately the election will be decided by what the editor of The Sun choses to print on his front page on the morning of polling day. That's usually how it works.
10 Fuck Off
20 GOTO 10
Ashton Black wrote:"Dogma is the enemy, not religion, per se. Rationality, genuine empathy and intellectual integrity are anathema to dogma."
- Deep Sea Isopod
- Bathynomus giganteus
- Posts: 7806
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:09 am
- Location: Gods blind spot.
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
As Nick Clegg pointed out. 65 years of Tory and Labour government making the same mistakes over and over again.
I'm all for giving someone else a chance. Lib Dems are the only party within range of being a threat to the other two parties, so I'll vote for them.
Still would prefer UKIP though.
I'm all for giving someone else a chance. Lib Dems are the only party within range of being a threat to the other two parties, so I'll vote for them.
Still would prefer UKIP though.
I run with scissors. It makes me feel dangerous 



- RuleBritannia
- Cupid is a cunt!
- Posts: 1630
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
- About me: About you
- Location: The Machine
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
Found something interesting. If you take Saturday's YouGov stats and put them into the BBC's "swing-o-meter" you can get a vague idea of how many seats each party would with those percentages.
Labour 28% = 275 seats
Conservative 33% = 245 seats
Lib Dem 30% = 99 seats
I makes me think if the Soviet Union had adopted such a quasi-democratic system they'd probably still be around today.
Labour 28% = 275 seats
Conservative 33% = 245 seats
Lib Dem 30% = 99 seats
I makes me think if the Soviet Union had adopted such a quasi-democratic system they'd probably still be around today.
RuleBritannia © MMXI
- Rum
- Absent Minded Processor
- Posts: 37285
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
- Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
That's the 'first past the post' system for ya.RuleBritannia wrote:Found something interesting. If you take Saturday's YouGov stats and put them into the BBC's "swing-o-meter" you can get a vague idea of how many seats each party would with those percentages.
Labour 28% = 275 seats
Conservative 33% = 245 seats
Lib Dem 30% = 99 seats
I makes me think if the Soviet Union had adopted such a quasi-democratic system they'd probably still be around today.
- Thinking Aloud
- Page Bottomer
- Posts: 20111
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:56 am
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
I did that too, and was amazed how completely at odds with common sense this result seemed to be. I admit that I only had the vaguest idea how it worked before today - now I haven't a clue.RuleBritannia wrote:Found something interesting. If you take Saturday's YouGov stats and put them into the BBC's "swing-o-meter" you can get a vague idea of how many seats each party would with those percentages.
Labour 28% = 275 seats
Conservative 33% = 245 seats
Lib Dem 30% = 99 seats
I makes me think if the Soviet Union had adopted such a quasi-democratic system they'd probably still be around today.
http://thinking-aloud.co.uk/ Musical Me
Re: The UK election thread
Edit:
Democracy!

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 22 guests