Coito ergo sum wrote:Hells yeah there is. And, it is just further evidence of the sexism that is rampant in the atheist, agnostic and freethinker community that we did not give the Women's World Cup the same attention as the men's world cup.
I mean - we had months of discussion, debate and trash talking about the 2010 men's world cup. We have had not even a peep about the women's world cup until 2 days before the Finals! Which, incidentally, is on Sunday between the number one ranked UNITED STATES and the underdog Japanee.
Our bitches are gunna make dem Japanese bitches day bitches!
Nothing to do with sexism. Until recently, women's soccer has not been of a standard to hold people's interest.
However, the standard has recently become far better - and this should deliver more TV coverage, which should help build public interest.
However, people are still free to remain disinterested in women's soccer, and this disinterest need have nothing to do with sexism whatsoever.
I'm not a big fan of tennis, but I far prefer women's tennis to men's tennis. I find that women's tennis is a bit more competitive, there are more rallies, and therefore it makes more interesting viewing. The chance to see Navratilova play - even if it is in doubles or on a senior competition is excellent. Am I sexist because I prefer women's tennis to men's tennis?