"Alt-right" Still Parading Ignorance, Stupidity, Malice, Etc.

[pErvinalia]

I know very well how I responded to 42. I responded to him the same way I would respond to anyone else who lied and misrepresented as much as he did. With no respect whatsoever.

[Cunt]

I know very well how I responded to 42. I responded to him the same way I would respond to anyone else who lied and misrepresented as much as he did. With no respect whatsoever.

lol

You do make a good case for yourself. I can read it in your words today, or years past.

Your choice of words and respect has nothing to do with others. It doesn't matter who you are being disagreeable with, you are the same.

[pErvinalia]

Says the forum troll.

[Cunt]

Says the forum troll.

Again, you make a great accounting of yourself here. You should feel especially proud when you insult members and get away with it. It shows your insults to be toothless and impotent.

[Brian Peacock]

That's hilarious, since you could go discuss such a topic in an open forum if you wished to.

Meh. It's not very honest, or brave, to pop up and tell me that I'll definitely disagree with something but then refuse to tell me what that thing actually is. It's basically calling me a disagreeable person for literally no reason - an ad hom wrapped around a strawman. Two fallacies for the price of one.

[Brian Peacock]

I did talk about it. I would guess that the interesting topics covered, will not be discussed by you here...

Nonsense. You literally refused to talk about Carl Benjamin's views on a particular issue after telling me I'd definitely disagree with them. You even accused me of ad homming him although I was quiet clear that I thought he was sincere about his views.

[NineBerry]

[Tero]

What is the content? We can't see your version.This?

[Cunt]

That's hilarious, since you could go discuss such a topic in an open forum if you wished to.

Meh. It's not very honest, or brave, to pop up and tell me that I'll definitely disagree with something but then refuse to tell me what that thing actually is. It's basically calling me a disagreeable person for literally no reason - an ad hom wrapped around a strawman. Two fallacies for the price of one.

You are right.

I shouldn't have opened such a can of worms. It isn't anything I'm comfortable talking about in a moderated forum. The topics don't suit this group. My apologies, and I'll keep an eye on topics I bring up with you.

[Brian Peacock]

Jesus, get over yourself man. Do you see what you did there? You're making the fact that you refused to talk about something everybody else's problem by complaining that others won't allow you to talk about certain things - when in fact it's you who doesn't have the confidence to say what you really think about something. This is complete nonsense. If you think a topic is interesting just bring it up. Some people might agree with your take, some people might not, but an interesting topic can't be discussed at all if you don't bring it up in the first place. So why even mention it to begin with?

[Joe]

For the lulz?

[Cunt]

Jesus, get over yourself man. Do you see what you did there? You're making the fact that you refused to talk about something everybody else's problem by complaining that others won't allow you to talk about certain things - when in fact it's you who doesn't have the confidence to say what you really think about something. This is complete nonsense. If you think a topic is interesting just bring it up. Some people might agree with your take, some people might not, but an interesting topic can't be discussed at all if you don't bring it up in the first place. So why even mention it to begin with?

Your right. It isn't important.

I know what I need to of your position already. It was my mistake to bring it up.

I'll listen to him and other contrary sources, but I'll try hard not to bother you with them. Maybe you'll take an interest in DIY, or fitness, or something less angrifying than their topics.

[Brian Peacock]

Jesus, get over yourself man. Do you see what you did there? You're making the fact that you refused to talk about something everybody else's problem by complaining that others won't allow you to talk about certain things - when in fact it's you who doesn't have the confidence to say what you really think about something. This is complete nonsense. If you think a topic is interesting just bring it up. Some people might agree with your take, some people might not, but an interesting topic can't be discussed at all if you don't bring it up in the first place. So why even mention it to begin with?

Your right. It isn't important.

I know what I need to of your position already. It was my mistake to bring it up.

I'll listen to him and other contrary sources, but I'll try hard not to bother you with them. Maybe you'll take an interest in DIY, or fitness, or something less angrifying than their topics.

Come off it. What do you know of my position on the murder of Samuel Paty? Even I don't know what my position is yet because I son't know anything about it and you refused to talk about it!

[Brian Peacock]

For the trolz?

[Cunt]

My position is that it is not suitable for discussion in this forum. I might talk about it if there were spaces where people could say the odd clumsy, or nasty thing, but here it is civilized.

Maybe you should take up DIY, or fitness if you want to chat.