Yet more problematic stuff

[Cunt]

I wouldn't say Omar's all that safe. We have a lot of mentally ill people in the US, and while most live normal lives, it only takes one person to be triggered by Trump's provocative rhetoric to cause her harm.

Some antifa whacko tried to firebomb a detention center because the leftie politicians started with this 'rhetoric' about concentration camps.

So the left insists the story isn't newsworthy.

Sean King called for more of those attacks. What about his rhetoric?

There is plenty of bullshit coming out of both sides. The interesting thing is the difference in media coverage from when they cover a politically blue whackjob vs when they cover a politically red one.

Trump uses provocative language to trigger the emotional dems into focusing on the wrong thing. Racist tweet gets endless attention. Ending asylum for central and south americans gets very little by comparison.

[Animavore]

More white supremacists get banged up.

Three white supremacists were sentenced to prison for violence at Charlottesville rally

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/07/20/us/w ... 2pEn4LcK9w

These are just small fry. They need to go after the ring-leader in the White House.

[pErvinalia]

I wouldn't say Omar's all that safe. We have a lot of mentally ill people in the US, and while most live normal lives, it only takes one person to be triggered by Trump's provocative rhetoric to cause her harm.

Some antifa whacko tried to firebomb a detention center because the leftie politicians started with this 'rhetoric' about concentration camps.

It's not rhetoric. It's an accurate description of them. For about the 5th time.

[Cunt]

I wouldn't say Omar's all that safe. We have a lot of mentally ill people in the US, and while most live normal lives, it only takes one person to be triggered by Trump's provocative rhetoric to cause her harm.

Some antifa whacko tried to firebomb a detention center because the leftie politicians started with this 'rhetoric' about concentration camps.

It's not rhetoric. It's an accurate description of them. For about the 5th time.

Are you supporting the whack job who attacked them? Or just trying to make it sound like he didn't do anything wrong?

He attacked people to push his antifa political agenda. Be clear, so we know if you have a position, or if you are just making noises like you have a position.

[pErvinalia]

Reread what I wrote. It's a pretty simple point.

[Cunt]

Reread what I wrote. It's a pretty simple point.

He said, again refusing to clarify his own position on the terrorist attack and attacker.

[pErvinalia]

You made a stupid statement, I pointed it out. Pretty simple really.

[Cunt]

You made a stupid statement, I pointed it out. Pretty simple really.

Great!

Still doesn't change the plain fact that you evade clarifying your position.

Either you don't have one, or you aren't smart enough to attempt to put it to words. I'm going to wonder which for awhile, then move on.

[pErvinalia]

You made a stupid statement, I pointed it out. Pretty simple really.

Great!

Good. Perhaps you'll stop making stupid statements now..

[Cunt]

You made a stupid statement, I pointed it out. Pretty simple really.

Great!

Good. Perhaps you'll stop making stupid statements now..

I'm still going to ask you to clarify your own position on this terrorist attack. You can just refuse to answer, like the politicians do when they are uncomfortable facing ugly realities.

[pErvinalia]

What isn't clear from what I've said in the thread (Trump thread) so far?

[Cunt]

What isn't clear from what I've said in the thread so far?

Not explicitly, no.

But you should have been able to guess that from my repeating the question.

Very politically savvy of you, to keep not answering clearly.

[pErvinalia]

What isn't clear from what I've said in the thread so far?

Not explicitly, no.

This is a literal non-sequitur. It makes no sense in the light of what you were replying to.

[Cunt]

What isn't clear from what I've said in the thread so far?

Not explicitly, no.

This is a literal non-sequitur. It makes no sense in the light of what you were replying to.

OK, start again if you want. There aren't any thread police.

It's very problematic if you can't just start again. (there - brought it right back on topic)

[pErvinalia]

Ok, what isn't clear from what I've said in the thread (Trump thread) so far?