Should science fiction films ONLY be allowed if they get the gravity right?
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 38040
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Should science fiction films ONLY be allowed if they get the gravity right?
I think the 'fiction' part of 'science fiction' is important here - though most of the 'science' bit in 'science fiction' is engineering. However, 'engineering fiction' doesn't have the same ring to it does it(?)
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
- Scot Dutchy
- Posts: 19000
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
- About me: Dijkbeschermer
- Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
- Contact:
Re: Should science fiction films ONLY be allowed if they get the gravity right?
I used to love my Eagle comics as a kid but in Dan Dare there were so many mistakes it really did become a comic.
"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".
- L'Emmerdeur
- Posts: 5711
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 11:04 pm
- About me: Yuh wust nightmaya!
- Contact:
Re: Should science fiction films ONLY be allowed if they get the gravity right?
While I think I understand what you're saying, I'll still proceed to speak up for the honor of Dr. Asimov. He had a doctorate in biochemistry and taught it at Boston University. What's more, he wrote many excellent books whose sole purpose was educating the lay public on science topics.Svartalf wrote: ↑Thu Jan 24, 2019 12:16 pmwhen computers are powered by 'positronic brains", then will asimov be a science author (yes I know he was educated in science and that heinlein was an engineer)... let's face it, regardless of background, their writings were not real science.Cunt wrote: ↑Thu Jan 24, 2019 2:56 amFuck YOU with a train comprised of Isaac Asimov, Robert Heinlein and Piers Anthony.Svartalf wrote: ↑Wed Jan 23, 2019 11:45 pmc'mon, by that yardstick, historical movies should only be allowed if they got their history right, and that meanst that all of them would be disallowed... SF films are foremost fiction, not science, and they're no means to educate the public in matters scientifical.
Philistine!
While his science fiction dealt with speculative extrapolations of the science of his day, I think he tried to avoid the outright impossible while not always succeeding. (Space opera FTL travel was a necessity in the Foundation series, for instance.)
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 40379
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Should science fiction films ONLY be allowed if they get the gravity right?
well, obviously , I may not have read the right books by Asimov, much as I understand I Robot to be more speculative fiction than actual science (where are my positronic brains, heck, how do we even use positrons in science 50 years later)... thing is, he posited scientific advances in his fiction that are neither known now, nor even in the line of what science even thinks it can ever achieve, he made science fantasy.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Sean Hayden
- Microagressor
- Posts: 17910
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
- About me: recovering humanist
- Contact:
Re: Should science fiction films ONLY be allowed if they get the gravity right?
Yep, I've actually got his introduction to physics book, and his robot stories are some of my favorites. There's real thinking in his work.L'Emmerdeur wrote: ↑Thu Jan 24, 2019 6:20 pmWhile I think I understand what you're saying, I'll still proceed to speak up for the honor of Dr. Asimov. He had a doctorate in biochemistry and taught it at Boston University. What's more, he wrote many excellent books whose sole purpose was educating the lay public on science topics.Svartalf wrote: ↑Thu Jan 24, 2019 12:16 pmwhen computers are powered by 'positronic brains", then will asimov be a science author (yes I know he was educated in science and that heinlein was an engineer)... let's face it, regardless of background, their writings were not real science.Cunt wrote: ↑Thu Jan 24, 2019 2:56 amFuck YOU with a train comprised of Isaac Asimov, Robert Heinlein and Piers Anthony.Svartalf wrote: ↑Wed Jan 23, 2019 11:45 pmc'mon, by that yardstick, historical movies should only be allowed if they got their history right, and that meanst that all of them would be disallowed... SF films are foremost fiction, not science, and they're no means to educate the public in matters scientifical.
Philistine!
While his science fiction dealt with speculative extrapolations of the science of his day, I think he tried to avoid the outright impossible while not always succeeding. (Space opera FTL travel was a necessity in the Foundation series, for instance.)
Re: Should science fiction films ONLY be allowed if they get the gravity right?
We used to have a set of mathematics encyclopedias, and he was among the authors.
He wrote more than most of you will ever read lol
Shit, Piss, Cock, Cunt, Motherfucker, Cocksucker and Tits.
-various artists
-various artists
The 'Walsh Question' 'What Is A Woman?' I'll put an answer here when someone posts one that is clear and comprehensible, by apostates to the Faith.
Update: I've been offered one!
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.
- Rum
- Absent Minded Processor
- Posts: 37285
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
- Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
- Contact:
Re: Should science fiction films ONLY be allowed if they get the gravity right?
Also -never mind science fiction. Was watching a Horizon documentary about the Juno probe to Jupiter this evening. They overplayed some of the (amazing) pics of the planet with animations of Juno doing its thing and now and again its navigation jets would fire and the twats added ‘fffttt’ jet sounds.
Idiots.
Idiots.
- L'Emmerdeur
- Posts: 5711
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 11:04 pm
- About me: Yuh wust nightmaya!
- Contact:
Re: Should science fiction films ONLY be allowed if they get the gravity right?
I've enjoyed and appreciated "Horizon" but WTF?
The dolt who chose to add sound effects should be made to wear a dunce cap while at work for at least a month.
The dolt who chose to add sound effects should be made to wear a dunce cap while at work for at least a month.
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Should science fiction films ONLY be allowed if they get the gravity right?
You conducted a survey to come to that conclusion? If so, having read well over a thousand books and many more articles and essays, I must consider myself to be part of the minority.
In my mid teens to mid twenties I devoured SF, mostly for its escapism, but some of the scientific speculations fascinated me. One of the story lines, written in the early or mid 1960s featured an army created from one individual who was genetically modified to become totally fearless and unconditionally obedient, and then cloned. Wild speculation then, literally fantastic, and still somewhat speculative, but not as far removed from pure fantasy now as it was a bit over half a century ago.
Physical absurdities turned me right off. I only looked at a Superman comic once. A few pages in someone fell (or was pushed) from a multistorey building. Superman swooped down and caught that person one or two metres off the ground. It occurred to me that he shouldn't have bothered - the deceleration caused by being caught in Superman's arms would have broken his bones and splatted his organs the same way as if he had hit the concrete a couple of metres further down. I never bothered with Superman, or any other superhero, again.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
Re: Should science fiction films ONLY be allowed if they get the gravity right?
I would compare your careful, thoughtful claim to the number he wrote, but I've had a tough time counting.Hermit wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 1:01 amYou conducted a survey to come to that conclusion? If so, having read well over a thousand books and many more articles and essays, I must consider myself to be part of the minority.
Stand by, thighs quivering with anticipation. It surely won't be long.
Yea, I saw that episode of Big Bang Theory, too. Funny episode. Very sciency.Hermit wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 1:01 amI only looked at a Superman comic once. A few pages in someone fell (or was pushed) from a multistorey building. Superman swooped down and caught that person one or two metres off the ground. It occurred to me that he shouldn't have bothered - the deceleration caused by being caught in Superman's arms would have broken his bones and splatted his organs the same way as if he had hit the concrete a couple of metres further down. I never bothered with Superman, or any other superhero, again.
Shit, Piss, Cock, Cunt, Motherfucker, Cocksucker and Tits.
-various artists
-various artists
The 'Walsh Question' 'What Is A Woman?' I'll put an answer here when someone posts one that is clear and comprehensible, by apostates to the Faith.
Update: I've been offered one!
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.
- laklak
- Posts: 20984
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
- About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
- Location: Tannhauser Gate
- Contact:
Re: Should science fiction films ONLY be allowed if they get the gravity right?
Frodo lives, man.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.
- rainbow
- Posts: 13534
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
- About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
- Location: Africa
- Contact:
Re: Should science fiction films ONLY be allowed if they get the gravity right?
Unobtainium deficiency most likely.
I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4
BArF−4
- trdsf
- Posts: 583
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:44 am
- About me: High functioning sociopath. With your number.
- Location: Columbus, Ohio
- Contact:
Re: Should science fiction films ONLY be allowed if they get the gravity right?
(stays out of the Asimov commentary other than to note that he's listening to his audiobook of the core Foundation trilogy for the nth time, where n is a large but still technically finite integer)
"The ships hung in the sky in much the same way that bricks don't." -- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
- trdsf
- Posts: 583
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:44 am
- About me: High functioning sociopath. With your number.
- Location: Columbus, Ohio
- Contact:
Re: Should science fiction films ONLY be allowed if they get the gravity right?
I have to reference Clarke as the counterexample here — in both Rendezvous with Rama and Childhood's End, interstellar travel is both tardyonic and relativistic, and in the latter book is explicitly used in a subplot. Carl Sagan turned to physicist Kip Thorne for a relativity-compliant means of fast interplanetary travel in Contact.
Otherwise, they kind of have to be ignored, set aside, or explained away in order to have a galactic (or even wide-spread interplanetary) civilization. As long as it's handled consistently, it seems to work most of the time. It's hard to write an interplanetary story where it's years, decades, or even centuries between replies.
"The ships hung in the sky in much the same way that bricks don't." -- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
Re: Should science fiction films ONLY be allowed if they get the gravity right?
I first came across Asimov in San Francisco airport in 1958 when I bought a copy of Foundation (hardback). I think I have them all tucked away on my bookshelves with all the other SF.
The third episode of Orville made an attempt to get the gravity 'right' (I think).
The third episode of Orville made an attempt to get the gravity 'right' (I think).
Absolute faith corrupts as absolutely as absolute power - Eric Hoffer.
I have NO BELIEF in the existence of a God or gods. I do not have to offer proof nor do I have to determine absence of proof because I do not ASSERT that a God does or does not or gods do or do not exist.
I have NO BELIEF in the existence of a God or gods. I do not have to offer proof nor do I have to determine absence of proof because I do not ASSERT that a God does or does not or gods do or do not exist.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests