Food Stamps to be drastically cut in the US

[Coito ergo sum]

"A lot of them are scumbags who sit home collecting the dole doing nothing and complaining about the injustice of the world while feigning "disabilities.""

^ This was aimed at me. Don't pretend it wasn't. Man the fuck up, you skirt.

No it wasn't. You aren't feigning a disability, are you?

Of course I'm not. But you like to continually suggest that I am. And stop being a pussy. Own up to your words. If you weren't taking a shot at me, then what the fuck where you talking about? Why were talking about "disabilities" in a thread about food stamps (a fact that you keep wanting to remind me about)? Why did your statement ape mine (attacking conservatives) using the same words and theme? You're a disingenuous scumbag. And a fucking pussy too. Man up and own your words.

I suggested nothing of the kind on this thread.

You own up to your own words, and stop playing games.

Read the post you made, and my response. Then you'll see what I was talking about. It was relevant to the point we were discussing. You were suggesting that you didn't care if "poor people" scammed the system, because the richie riches were doing it worse. I pointed out that the scammers were not poor or needy people, they were, like, folks who feign disabilities, or people who have means but hide their income to pretend to be poor.

Really, step back. Take a chill pill. And, relax. I did not insult you. Whether you think I was alluding to you or not is beside the point. I didn't violate the rules. I did not personally attack you. I didn't even violate the "play nice" rule.

Even if you thought I was attacking you for feigning a disability, so what? You attacked me for being "mental" in a previous thread, and you attacked my supposed medical condition. You've done that over and over again. You hypocritically complain that was bashing you're "disability" (when I wasn't) and yet you do that stuff all the time -- and, add to that - you grossly violate the rules with wild abandon.

Please, stop.

[pErvinalia]

Please kiss my arse.

I do own my words, hence why there's no hiding behind veils when I attack. No one is left in any doubt that I am attacking you. You, on the other hand, make pathetic low down attacks, and then try and bullshit your way out of owning your words. And when the mods call you up on it, you whinge like a little girl. Here's some advice for you: PLEASE STOP.

And regarding the bit about your supposed medical condition, how many times do I have to fucking explain the difference to you? I'd assume you were too thick to get it, except you have a long history of being a dishonest debater, so I can only assume you are continuing in that trend.

[Warren Dew]

We have supermarkets in most towns too. The difference is in the type of supermarket. We have two or three huge supermarket chains who are significantly cheaper than the others due to their ability to buy in bulk. What would cost say $20 a week here in a big chain, would cost probably close to $30-$35 in a small chain. That obviously makes a huge difference to someone doing it tough.

Again, what you have is irrelevant to the U.S.

[Svartalf]

"A lot of them are scumbags who sit home collecting the dole doing nothing and complaining about the injustice of the world while feigning "disabilities.""

^ This was aimed at me. Don't pretend it wasn't. Man the fuck up, you skirt.

Actually, it might be aimed at me, I'm pensioned off at near starvation level because I can't work anymore.

[Coito ergo sum]

Please kiss my arse.

I do own my words, hence why there's no hiding behind veils when I attack. No one is left in any doubt that I am attacking you. You, on the other hand, make pathetic low down attacks, and then try and bullshit your way out of owning your words. And when the mods call you up on it, you whinge like a little girl. Here's some advice for you: PLEASE STOP.

And regarding the bit about your supposed medical condition, how many times do I have to fucking explain the difference to you? I'd assume you were too thick to get it, except you have a long history of being a dishonest debater, so I can only assume you are continuing in that trend.

There is nothing I've done here that has violated the rules. I am absolutely within my rights to discuss people who feign their way into government benefits. It's a legitimate discussion. It may be something you find distasteful, and you may pretend it is an attack on you personally, but it just plain isn't.

The "difference" that you see in your attacks on me being "mental" or having a medical condition is not a difference at all. It's just your own justification for giving yourself permission to slander other people's medical conditions or mental health, while still complaining about other people doing it. And, here, it's one step further -- I didn't even attack your mental health or medical condition, or your alleged disability. I said nothing about you, and yet you still whine about it for some reason.

Cut it out, rEv. You're embarrassing yourself.

[pErvinalia]

We have supermarkets in most towns too. The difference is in the type of supermarket. We have two or three huge supermarket chains who are significantly cheaper than the others due to their ability to buy in bulk. What would cost say $20 a week here in a big chain, would cost probably close to $30-$35 in a small chain. That obviously makes a huge difference to someone doing it tough.

Again, what you have is irrelevant to the U.S.

And the stick up your arse is irrelevant to me.

[pErvinalia]

"A lot of them are scumbags who sit home collecting the dole doing nothing and complaining about the injustice of the world while feigning "disabilities.""

^ This was aimed at me. Don't pretend it wasn't. Man the fuck up, you skirt.

Actually, it might be aimed at me, I'm pensioned off at near starvation level because I can't work anymore.

No, it was definitely aimed at me. He's got a history of this, and he has directly aped my attack on conservatives.

[pErvinalia]

Please kiss my arse.

I do own my words, hence why there's no hiding behind veils when I attack. No one is left in any doubt that I am attacking you. You, on the other hand, make pathetic low down attacks, and then try and bullshit your way out of owning your words. And when the mods call you up on it, you whinge like a little girl. Here's some advice for you: PLEASE STOP.

And regarding the bit about your supposed medical condition, how many times do I have to fucking explain the difference to you? I'd assume you were too thick to get it, except you have a long history of being a dishonest debater, so I can only assume you are continuing in that trend.

There is nothing I've done here that has violated the rules. I am absolutely within my rights to discuss people who feign their way into government benefits. It's a legitimate discussion. It may be something you find distasteful, and you may pretend it is an attack on you personally, but it just plain isn't.

The "difference" that you see in your attacks on me being "mental" or having a medical condition is not a difference at all. It's just your own justification for giving yourself permission to slander other people's medical conditions or mental health, while still complaining about other people doing it. And, here, it's one step further -- I didn't even attack your mental health or medical condition, or your alleged disability. I said nothing about you, and yet you still whine about it for some reason.

Cut it out, rEv. You're embarrassing yourself.

You don't have a fucking medical condition that is being attacked. Stop being a disingenuous twat.

[Svartalf]

Is conservatism in the DSM yet?

[pErvinalia]

It should be.

[Coito ergo sum]

Please kiss my arse.

I do own my words, hence why there's no hiding behind veils when I attack. No one is left in any doubt that I am attacking you. You, on the other hand, make pathetic low down attacks, and then try and bullshit your way out of owning your words. And when the mods call you up on it, you whinge like a little girl. Here's some advice for you: PLEASE STOP.

And regarding the bit about your supposed medical condition, how many times do I have to fucking explain the difference to you? I'd assume you were too thick to get it, except you have a long history of being a dishonest debater, so I can only assume you are continuing in that trend.

There is nothing I've done here that has violated the rules. I am absolutely within my rights to discuss people who feign their way into government benefits. It's a legitimate discussion. It may be something you find distasteful, and you may pretend it is an attack on you personally, but it just plain isn't.

The "difference" that you see in your attacks on me being "mental" or having a medical condition is not a difference at all. It's just your own justification for giving yourself permission to slander other people's medical conditions or mental health, while still complaining about other people doing it. And, here, it's one step further -- I didn't even attack your mental health or medical condition, or your alleged disability. I said nothing about you, and yet you still whine about it for some reason.

Cut it out, rEv. You're embarrassing yourself.

You don't have a fucking medical condition that is being attacked. Stop being a disingenuous twat.

It doesn't matter, Rev. First of all, you have no idea whether I do or don't have a medical condition. Stop pretending that you are the decider as to who, what, where, and when, insults are allowed, and which ones are important or not. I may well have a medical condition, i may just not have shared it with the forum. Second of all, even if I don't have a medical condition, that doesn't give you the right to personally attack me by telling me I have one, which you have done in the past. Saying "your mental" is a personal attack whether I have a mental condition or not. Learn the rules, please.

Third of all, I did not attack you at all or any condition you suffer from. I made a reference to people who scam the system by feigning disabilities. That isn't you, is it? You've already answered "no" to that, so what are you worried about? Further, even if you WERE one of those people who feign disabilities, what I said STILL would not be a personal attack against you, and it wasn't even a violation of the play nice rule, since it wasn't even a non-nice thing said to or about you.

I would greatly appreciate it if you would abide by the rules and cut out the namecalling.

[pErvinalia]

I know exactly what the rules are. The rules don't stop people from being bigoted and racist. Therefore, I will call it out (like others do) when I see it. Just because something is within the rules of one of the loosest moderated forums on the web, doesn't mean that what is being said isn't a low down cunt act. I wish to fucking god you would understand this point, so I could stop having to waste my time repeating it to you. You really are clueless to what you are doing.

Finally, regarding this fucking inane point you keep disingenuously raising about your possible/potential/maybe/not-likely medical condition, how many fucking times am I going to have to explain this to you? Seriously. You can't be this thick. And besides, AS I'VE EXPLAINED PREVIOUSLY, I am more than happy to apologise and retract anything I've said that is attacking something that you have no choice over. Have you done the same? No, because you are a low down scumbag cunt.

[Coito ergo sum]

I know exactly what the rules are. The rules don't stop people from being bigoted and racist. Therefore, I will call it out (like others do) when I see it. Just because something is within the rules of one of the loosest moderated forums on the web, doesn't mean that what is being said isn't a low down cunt act. I wish to fucking god you would understand this point, so I could stop having to waste my time repeating it to you. You really are clueless to what you are doing.

Finally, regarding this fucking inane point you keep disingenuously raising about your possible/potential/maybe/not-likely medical condition, how many fucking times am I going to have to explain this to you? Seriously. You can't be this thick. And besides, AS I'VE EXPLAINED PREVIOUSLY, I am more than happy to apologise and retract anything I've said that is attacking something that you have no choice over. Have you done the same? No, because you are a low down scumbag cunt.

Rev, I have been neither bigoted, nor racist.

You have. When you call someone "mental" even when they don't have a known mental condition, you are making a bigoted statement every bit as much as someone who says "you're mental" to someone who has a mental condition.

I made no bigoted statement on this thread. All I said, again, was that there are some people who scam the system by feigning disabilities. You can "call it like you see it" all you want, but you are not "seeing" anything. You're imagining things.

You are correct, just because something is within the rules doesn't mean it isn't a [see bolded words above]. The same applies to you. You've called me a scumbag, pussy and all sorts of things on this thread, and I've not called you anything. You've been complaining about something I've said, when I said nothing about you, and I've not said anything "low down" at all.

I have nothing to apologize for -- because I haven't attacked anyone, Rev.

And, you need to understand that you aren't allowed to personally attack people at all, not just about things they have no choice over. You can't personally attack people for things they have choices over. There are no personal attacks permitted. I can't call a member a scumbag conservative, just because they they have a choice in the matter, just like I can't call someone a scumbag honkey or scumbag spic. Those are all personal attacks.

Take a deep breath, and think on this for a bit. Also, think on the fact that my statement that there are people who fake disabilities does, in fact, relate to something people have a "choice" about. People choose to fake things when they fake them. So, again, you're wrong. You're wrong in every respect, and you're acting disingenuously, nastily, rudely, and distastefully in almost every way.

[pErvinalia]

yawn.

Let me know when the bollocky essay is over.

[Warren Dew]

Finally, regarding this fucking inane point you keep disingenuously raising about your possible/potential/maybe/not-likely medical condition, how many fucking times am I going to have to explain this to you? Seriously. You can't be this thick. And besides, AS I'VE EXPLAINED PREVIOUSLY, I am more than happy to apologise and retract anything I've said that is attacking something that you have no choice over. Have you done the same?

Why should Coito apologize for something he hasn't done? Do you apologize for things you haven't done?