Connecticut (et al)

Post Reply
User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Connecticut (et al)

Post by Gallstones » Fri Dec 21, 2012 6:05 pm

Confusing information



The medical examiner is wrong? :think:
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39291
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by Animavore » Fri Dec 21, 2012 6:29 pm

Maybe he also had two assault rifles? :dunno:
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by Blind groper » Fri Dec 21, 2012 6:32 pm

Bearing in mind that the video shown, supposedly of the long rifle being retrieved from the car boot, could have been damn near anything, I would tend to believe the medical examiner.

However, if it was the other way round, it would support the argument I have made all along. Hand guns are the major problem, and hand guns should be restricted as much as possible.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51696
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 8-34-20
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by Tero » Fri Dec 21, 2012 6:52 pm

He did not leave the school, so the casings are either inside or within school grounds. The handguns were what caliper?

Besides, he would have had to reload to handguns, so there must be evidence of that?

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by Blind groper » Fri Dec 21, 2012 6:59 pm

On assassinations and guns.

Four American presidents have been assassinated. All with guns.

A number of attempted assassinations have also happened, some of which resulted in presidents being wounded with bullets.
Excluding threats that did not actually happen, there have been 14 occasions where someone fired at a president. There have also been two attempts at assassination by flying a plane so as to crash into where a president was, and 6 attempts with bombs - all thwarted by those who guard the president.

So 18 times people have fired bullets at a president, and only 8 attempts at assassination with all other methods combined, all of which failed.

Still deny that guns are a problem?
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39291
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by Animavore » Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:01 pm

Tero wrote:The handguns were what caliper?

Oddleg caliper :coffee:
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by Jason » Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:06 pm

A wound from a .223 is drastically different from a wound from a pistol calibre. So yeah..

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by Jason » Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:09 pm

According to the LA Times, there was a shotgun left in his vehicle. He used the Bushmaster to actually kill most of the 20 children and 6 adults (I'm guessing he emptied the magazine, dropped it and went for one of his pistols), he used the Glock 10mm to shoot himself in the head, I'm not sure what calibre the Sig Sauer was.

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51696
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 8-34-20
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by Tero » Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:19 pm

Wiki only list the shotgun as being at the car
A large quantity of unused ammunition was recovered from the school along with three semi-automatic firearms found with Adam Lanza: a .223-caliber Bushmaster XM-15 rifle,[87] a 10mm Glock 20 SF handgun [5][88] and a 9mm SIG Sauer handgun.[4][89] A shotgun was found in the car Lanza had driven to the school.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by Seth » Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:04 am

Blind groper wrote:On assassinations and guns.

Four American presidents have been assassinated. All with guns.

A number of attempted assassinations have also happened, some of which resulted in presidents being wounded with bullets.
Excluding threats that did not actually happen, there have been 14 occasions where someone fired at a president. There have also been two attempts at assassination by flying a plane so as to crash into where a president was, and 6 attempts with bombs - all thwarted by those who guard the president.

So 18 times people have fired bullets at a president, and only 8 attempts at assassination with all other methods combined, all of which failed.

Still deny that guns are a problem?
Yup. Assassins are the problem, not guns. You might want to reflect on the fact that everybody who guards the President carries a gun.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by Jason » Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:07 am

How did they kill monarchs in days of olde? Ear poison? Swords? Guillotines? :ask:

aspire1670
Posts: 318
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:37 pm

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by aspire1670 » Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:24 am

Seth wrote:
Blind groper wrote:On assassinations and guns.

Four American presidents have been assassinated. All with guns.

A number of attempted assassinations have also happened, some of which resulted in presidents being wounded with bullets.
Excluding threats that did not actually happen, there have been 14 occasions where someone fired at a president. There have also been two attempts at assassination by flying a plane so as to crash into where a president was, and 6 attempts with bombs - all thwarted by those who guard the president.

So 18 times people have fired bullets at a president, and only 8 attempts at assassination with all other methods combined, all of which failed.

Still deny that guns are a problem?
Yup. Assassins are the problem, not guns weapons You might want to reflect on the fact that everybody who guards the President carries a gun.
In that case, and following your logic, why do the guards carry only guns?
All rights have to be voted on. That's how they become rights.

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by Blind groper » Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:25 am

Făkünamę wrote:How did they kill monarchs in days of olde?
Rarely. Monarchs in days of old kept themselves well away from the common people, meaning common people could not assassinate them. Occasionally one of the other people with power, and hence access to the monarch, would do the dirty deed, but it was uncommon.

Modern democracy and guns have changed things. American presidents have to display themselves in public, and despite those guards with guns, a hell of a lot of those presidents (and other politicians) end up wearing a bullet hole.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

User avatar
orpheus
Posts: 1522
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:43 am
About me: The name is Epictetus. Waldo Epictetus.
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by orpheus » Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:36 am

Seth wrote:
Blind groper wrote:On assassinations and guns.

Four American presidents have been assassinated. All with guns.

A number of attempted assassinations have also happened, some of which resulted in presidents being wounded with bullets.
Excluding threats that did not actually happen, there have been 14 occasions where someone fired at a president. There have also been two attempts at assassination by flying a plane so as to crash into where a president was, and 6 attempts with bombs - all thwarted by those who guard the president.

So 18 times people have fired bullets at a president, and only 8 attempts at assassination with all other methods combined, all of which failed.

Still deny that guns are a problem?
Yup. Assassins are the problem, not guns. You might want to reflect on the fact that everybody who guards the President carries a gun.
Yes, let's reflect on that. These are highly trained professionals, always on alert when on duty, and are tasked with protecting one single person whose carefully planned out movements they know in advance. And even they get it wrong. How do we expect Joe or Jane Q. Public to perform? And when the Secret Service have saved someone's life, it's rarely, rarely by using their own gun. Several times it has been by putting themselves bodily between the assassin's bullet and the President (or whoever they're protecting). Honorable and incredibly brave, but one doesn't need a gun to do that.
Last edited by orpheus on Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:38 am, edited 2 times in total.
I think that language has a lot to do with interfering in our relationship to direct experience. A simple thing like metaphor will allows you to go to a place and say 'this is like that'. Well, this isn't like that. This is like this.

—Richard Serra

User avatar
orpheus
Posts: 1522
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:43 am
About me: The name is Epictetus. Waldo Epictetus.
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by orpheus » Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:37 am

aspire1670 wrote:
Seth wrote:
Blind groper wrote:On assassinations and guns.

Four American presidents have been assassinated. All with guns.

A number of attempted assassinations have also happened, some of which resulted in presidents being wounded with bullets.
Excluding threats that did not actually happen, there have been 14 occasions where someone fired at a president. There have also been two attempts at assassination by flying a plane so as to crash into where a president was, and 6 attempts with bombs - all thwarted by those who guard the president.

So 18 times people have fired bullets at a president, and only 8 attempts at assassination with all other methods combined, all of which failed.

Still deny that guns are a problem?
Yup. Assassins are the problem, not guns weapons You might want to reflect on the fact that everybody who guards the President carries a gun.
In that case, and following your logic, why do the guards carry only guns?
Also a good point.
I think that language has a lot to do with interfering in our relationship to direct experience. A simple thing like metaphor will allows you to go to a place and say 'this is like that'. Well, this isn't like that. This is like this.

—Richard Serra

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests