-
amused
- amused
- Posts: 3873
- Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:04 pm
- About me: Reinvention phase initiated
-
Contact:
Post
by amused » Fri Jan 20, 2012 1:43 am
It's a paid holiday for Texas employees to celebrate....what? The fact that the south waged a war against civil rights? When three days earlier we celebrated the civil rights movement and Martin Luther King. In some years, both holidays will fall on the same day. Talk about an anachronism...
But I did enjoy the day off.
Attended a MoveOn event in front of the local Obama headquarters and waved signs and chanted something about making the banks pay! Fun!
-
Robert_S
- Cookie Monster
- Posts: 13416
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
- About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
- Location: Illinois
-
Contact:
Post
by Robert_S » Fri Jan 20, 2012 4:10 am
It was about honoring those who died protecting the sanctity of other people's property.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
-
tattuchu
- a dickload of cocks
- Posts: 21890
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:59 pm
- About me: I'm having trouble with the trolley.
- Location: Marmite-upon-Toast, Wankershire
-
Contact:
Post
by tattuchu » Fri Jan 20, 2012 5:10 am
OPP, yeah you know me!

People think "queue" is just "q" followed by 4 silent letters.
But those letters are not silent.
They're just waiting their turn.
-
Seth
- GrandMaster Zen Troll
- Posts: 22077
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
-
Contact:
Post
by Seth » Fri Jan 20, 2012 6:34 am
Can we hear some opprobrium about the people who lionize Che, or celebrate Communist Worker's Day now?
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
-
JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 74293
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
-
Contact:
Post
by JimC » Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:51 am
Nathan Bedford Forrest would be pleased...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
-
Robert_S
- Cookie Monster
- Posts: 13416
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
- About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
- Location: Illinois
-
Contact:
Post
by Robert_S » Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:54 am
Seth wrote:Can we hear some opprobrium about the people who lionize Che, or celebrate Communist Worker's Day now?
Che killed off all those kangaroos

But what's wrong with making the communists work for a day?
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
-
amused
- amused
- Posts: 3873
- Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:04 pm
- About me: Reinvention phase initiated
-
Contact:
Post
by amused » Fri Jan 20, 2012 5:43 pm
Robert_S wrote:It was about honoring those who died protecting the sanctity of other people's property.
I'm not sure my Black co-workers will appreciate the revisionist history, but I'll see what they say.

-
Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
-
Contact:
Post
by Tyrannical » Fri Jan 20, 2012 5:48 pm
I hope you had a pleasant Robert E. Lee day.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
-
Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
-
Contact:
Post
by Tyrannical » Fri Jan 20, 2012 5:50 pm
JimC wrote:Nathan Bedford Forrest would be pleased...
I'm surprised you know who that is

A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
-
Robert_S
- Cookie Monster
- Posts: 13416
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
- About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
- Location: Illinois
-
Contact:
Post
by Robert_S » Fri Jan 20, 2012 6:24 pm
amused wrote:Robert_S wrote:It was about honoring those who died protecting the sanctity of other people's property.
I'm not sure my Black co-workers will appreciate the revisionist history, but I'll see what they say.

It's not revisionist, but I am being snarky at the descendants those poor white trash who died for the economic well being of the plantation owners.
Saying it's about state's rights is though, that's revisionist.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
-
Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41173
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
-
Contact:
Post
by Svartalf » Fri Jan 20, 2012 6:48 pm
How about being snarky at the poor white trash that died for the economic well being of the carpet baggers?
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
-
Robert_S
- Cookie Monster
- Posts: 13416
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
- About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
- Location: Illinois
-
Contact:
Post
by Robert_S » Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:24 pm
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
-
amused
- amused
- Posts: 3873
- Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:04 pm
- About me: Reinvention phase initiated
-
Contact:
Post
by amused » Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:16 pm
Robert_S wrote:amused wrote:Robert_S wrote:It was about honoring those who died protecting the sanctity of other people's property.
I'm not sure my Black co-workers will appreciate the revisionist history, but I'll see what they say.

It's not revisionist, but I am being snarky at the descendants those poor white trash who died for the economic well being of the plantation owners.
Saying it's about state's rights is though, that's revisionist.
Ah, got it. Yeah, I thought the state's rights bullshit is where you were pointing. My bad.
-
JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 74293
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
-
Contact:
Post
by JimC » Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:45 pm
Tyrannical wrote:JimC wrote:Nathan Bedford Forrest would be pleased...
I'm surprised you know who that is


Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
-
Gallstones
- Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
- Posts: 8888
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
- About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.
Post
by Gallstones » Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:16 pm
Despite the politics, some of those people were heroic in the circumstances they found themselves in.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 22 guests