Trident, do we need it?

Trident

I say we nuke the site from orbit
5
71%
Nukes? who needs 'em
2
29%
 
Total votes: 7

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23746
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Trident, do we need it?

Post by Clinton Huxley » Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:16 pm

Im sure if we got rid, iran or france would get us the very next day.

User avatar
Schneibster
Asker of inconvenient questions
Posts: 3976
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:22 pm
About me: I hate cranks.
Location: Late. I'm always late.
Contact:

Re: Trident, do we need it?

Post by Schneibster » Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:17 pm

Animavore wrote:Who came up with 'Trident' anyway? Ian Fleming?
I got nothin'.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. -Thomas Jefferson
Image

User avatar
Audley Strange
"I blame the victim"
Posts: 7485
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Trident, do we need it?

Post by Audley Strange » Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:18 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:Im sure if we got rid, iran or france would get us the very next day.
Or Irance, as the intelligence agencies don't refer to it as.
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man

User avatar
Geoff
Pouncer
Posts: 9374
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:39 pm
Location: Wigan, UK
Contact:

Re: Trident, do we need it?

Post by Geoff » Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:19 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:Im sure if we got rid, iran or france would get us the very next day.
Ah, cheers Clinton, forgot about France - previous post edited accordingly.
Image
"...anyone who says it’s “just the Internet” can :pawiz: . And then when they come back, they can :pawiz: again." - Tigger

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39291
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: Trident, do we need it?

Post by Animavore » Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:20 pm

I don't trust Johnny English with the bomb and we can't trust the French to protect us. Do those Ruskies have any bombs lying around we could buy?

The next thing will be to find a pub to leave it in.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

User avatar
Schneibster
Asker of inconvenient questions
Posts: 3976
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:22 pm
About me: I hate cranks.
Location: Late. I'm always late.
Contact:

Re: Trident, do we need it?

Post by Schneibster » Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:21 pm

You can be the backup plan.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. -Thomas Jefferson
Image

User avatar
Geoff
Pouncer
Posts: 9374
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:39 pm
Location: Wigan, UK
Contact:

Re: Trident, do we need it?

Post by Geoff » Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:30 pm

Animavore wrote:I don't trust Johnny English with the bomb and we can't trust the French to protect us. Do those Ruskies have any bombs lying around we could buy?

The next thing will be to find a pub to leave it in.
Anyone starts messing with our pubs, there will be trouble! Blow up the Houses of Parliament instead, and do us all a favour. :tup:
Image
"...anyone who says it’s “just the Internet” can :pawiz: . And then when they come back, they can :pawiz: again." - Tigger

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39291
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: Trident, do we need it?

Post by Animavore » Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:32 pm

Geoff wrote:
Animavore wrote:I don't trust Johnny English with the bomb and we can't trust the French to protect us. Do those Ruskies have any bombs lying around we could buy?

The next thing will be to find a pub to leave it in.
Anyone starts messing with our pubs, there will be trouble! Blow up the Houses of Parliament instead, and do us all a favour. :tup:
Nah. We leave you to blow it up yourselves :hehe:
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

PsychoSerenity
"I" Self-Perceive Recursively
Posts: 7824
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:57 am
Contact:

Re: Trident, do we need it?

Post by PsychoSerenity » Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:33 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:We couldnt guarantee to wipe out the enemy's remaining capacity with a counterstrike. They would probably nuke us back. Everyone ends up worse. Id rather spend the money on conventional forces that could actually be used. Or on a shield. Our nukes are pointless.
:this:
Schneibster wrote:Right now they're the only known way to reduce the likelihood of a nuclear strike against your soil maximally. There is no "shield;" you saw the Patriot batteries work. And those were lo-tech missiles they were shooting them at. They're not much better today. It's too high and too fast. The only sure thing protection is the threat of retaliation and it must be credible. That's a bitch, but there it is.
No, the best way to reduce the likelihood of being attacked is to make sure that everyone else is better off by us not being attacked.
[Disclaimer - if this is comes across like I think I know what I'm talking about, I want to make it clear that I don't. I'm just trying to get my thoughts down]

User avatar
Schneibster
Asker of inconvenient questions
Posts: 3976
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:22 pm
About me: I hate cranks.
Location: Late. I'm always late.
Contact:

Re: Trident, do we need it?

Post by Schneibster » Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:40 pm

Psychoserenity wrote:
Schneibster wrote:Right now they're the only known way to reduce the likelihood of a nuclear strike against your soil maximally. There is no "shield;" you saw the Patriot batteries work. And those were lo-tech missiles they were shooting them at. They're not much better today. It's too high and too fast. The only sure thing protection is the threat of retaliation and it must be credible. That's a bitch, but there it is.
No, the best way to reduce the likelihood of being attacked is to make sure that everyone else is better off by us not being attacked.
I don't understand why you said "no" and then agreed with me.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. -Thomas Jefferson
Image

PsychoSerenity
"I" Self-Perceive Recursively
Posts: 7824
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:57 am
Contact:

Re: Trident, do we need it?

Post by PsychoSerenity » Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:48 pm

Schneibster wrote:
Psychoserenity wrote:
Schneibster wrote:Right now they're the only known way to reduce the likelihood of a nuclear strike against your soil maximally. There is no "shield;" you saw the Patriot batteries work. And those were lo-tech missiles they were shooting them at. They're not much better today. It's too high and too fast. The only sure thing protection is the threat of retaliation and it must be credible. That's a bitch, but there it is.
No, the best way to reduce the likelihood of being attacked is to make sure that everyone else is better off by us not being attacked.
I don't understand why you said "no" and then agreed with me.
Making them better off by us not being attacked does not have to mean actively making them worse off if we are.
[Disclaimer - if this is comes across like I think I know what I'm talking about, I want to make it clear that I don't. I'm just trying to get my thoughts down]

User avatar
Schneibster
Asker of inconvenient questions
Posts: 3976
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:22 pm
About me: I hate cranks.
Location: Late. I'm always late.
Contact:

Re: Trident, do we need it?

Post by Schneibster » Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:54 pm

As I've said, I admire the idea and wish I thought it would work. I look at China, and Pakistan, and Russia, and I know it won't. That's reality. You either back it up with the shit or you ain't shit as far as they're concerned. Nobody's gonna fuck up with a nuclear weapon. The costs are just too high.

Personally I think the US should give the Iranians five of the fuckin' things, here ya go, we made 'em for ya, now don't fuck it up or the old man of smoke nods over Tehran, bye now. They'd find 'em more of a burden than a comfort.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. -Thomas Jefferson
Image

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39291
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: Trident, do we need it?

Post by Animavore » Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:57 pm

World peace achieved through the ultimate Mexican stand-off :nyan:
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

User avatar
Schneibster
Asker of inconvenient questions
Posts: 3976
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:22 pm
About me: I hate cranks.
Location: Late. I'm always late.
Contact:

Re: Trident, do we need it?

Post by Schneibster » Tue Dec 06, 2011 8:05 pm

Only for a while.

And after all, there is the asteroid threat. Just 'cause it's not a dino-killer don't mean we're all cool and shit with it fallin' on Moscow. Or Rio. And while we've ruled out dino-killers for a few thousand years, we haven't ruled out city-killers.

And lookit me, here I am talkin' "dino-killers" when I was just postin' about the Deccan Traps.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. -Thomas Jefferson
Image

PsychoSerenity
"I" Self-Perceive Recursively
Posts: 7824
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:57 am
Contact:

Re: Trident, do we need it?

Post by PsychoSerenity » Tue Dec 06, 2011 8:22 pm

Schneibster wrote:As I've said, I admire the idea and wish I thought it would work. I look at China, and Pakistan, and Russia, and I know it won't. That's reality.
I look at China, Pakistan and Russia, and I strongly suspect that the vast majority of people there also don't want to be involved in a nuclear war - and the ones that think they need to threaten revenge to be safe, are most likely thinking along exactly the same lines as you. They look at France, and the USA, and Britain, and think "what choice do we have?".
[Disclaimer - if this is comes across like I think I know what I'm talking about, I want to make it clear that I don't. I'm just trying to get my thoughts down]

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests