The birth of a new species observed
- Elessarina
- Bearer of Anduril
- Posts: 9517
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 5:12 pm
- About me: The Fastest Ratz.. apparently
- Location: Rivendell
- Contact:
The birth of a new species observed
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/ ... d/index%20(Wired:%20Index%203%20(Top%20Stories%202
On one of the Galapagos islands whose finches shaped the theories of a young Charles Darwin, biologists have witnessed that elusive moment when a single species splits in two.
In many ways, the split followed predictable patterns, requiring a hybrid newcomer who’d already taken baby steps down a new evolutionary path. But playing an unexpected part was chance, and the newcomer singing his own special song.
This miniature evolutionary saga is described in a paper published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. It’s authored by Peter and Rosemary Grant, a husband-and-wife team who have spent much of the last 36 years studying a group of bird species known collectively as Darwin’s finches.
The finches — or, technically, tanagers — have adapted to the conditions of each island in the Galapagos, and they provided Darwin with a clear snapshot of evolutionary divergence when he sailed there on the HMS Beagle. The Grants have pushed that work further, with decades of painstaking observations providing a real-time record of evolution in action. In the PNAS paper, they describe something Darwin could only have dreamed of watching: the birth of a new species.
The species’ forefather was a medium ground finch, or Geospiza fortis, who flew from a neighboring island to the Grants’ island of Daphne Major, and into their nets, in 1981. He “was unusually large, especially in beak width, sang an unusual song” and had a few gene variants that could be traced to another finch species, they wrote. This exotic stranger soon found a mate, who also happened to have a few hybrid genes. The happy couple had five sons.
In the tradition of finches, for whom songs are passed from father to son and used to serenade potential mates, the sons learned their immigrant father’s tunes. But their father’s vocalizations were strange: he’d tried to mimick the natives, but accidentally introduced new notes and inflections, like a person who learns a song in a language he doesn’t understand.
These tunes set the sons apart, as did their unusual size. Though they found mates, it may only have taken a couple generations for the new lineage to ignore — or be ignored by — local finches, and breed only with each other. The Grants couldn’t tell for certain when this started, but they were certain after four generations, when a drought struck the island, killing all but a single brother and sister. They mated with each other, and their children did the same.
No exact rule exists for deciding when a group of animals constitutes a separate species. That question “is rarely if ever asked,” as speciation isn’t something that scientists have been fortunate enough to watch at the precise moment of divergence, except in bacteria and other simple creatures. But after at least three generations of reproductive isolation, the Grants felt comfortable in designating the new lineage as an incipient species.
The future of the species is far from certain. It’s possible that they’ll be out-competed by other finches on the island. Their initial gene pool may contain flaws that will be magnified with time. A chance disaster could wipe them out. The birds might even return to the fold of their parent species, and merge with them through interbreeding.
But whatever happens, their legacy will remain: New species can emerge very quickly — and sometimes all it takes is a song.
On one of the Galapagos islands whose finches shaped the theories of a young Charles Darwin, biologists have witnessed that elusive moment when a single species splits in two.
In many ways, the split followed predictable patterns, requiring a hybrid newcomer who’d already taken baby steps down a new evolutionary path. But playing an unexpected part was chance, and the newcomer singing his own special song.
This miniature evolutionary saga is described in a paper published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. It’s authored by Peter and Rosemary Grant, a husband-and-wife team who have spent much of the last 36 years studying a group of bird species known collectively as Darwin’s finches.
The finches — or, technically, tanagers — have adapted to the conditions of each island in the Galapagos, and they provided Darwin with a clear snapshot of evolutionary divergence when he sailed there on the HMS Beagle. The Grants have pushed that work further, with decades of painstaking observations providing a real-time record of evolution in action. In the PNAS paper, they describe something Darwin could only have dreamed of watching: the birth of a new species.
The species’ forefather was a medium ground finch, or Geospiza fortis, who flew from a neighboring island to the Grants’ island of Daphne Major, and into their nets, in 1981. He “was unusually large, especially in beak width, sang an unusual song” and had a few gene variants that could be traced to another finch species, they wrote. This exotic stranger soon found a mate, who also happened to have a few hybrid genes. The happy couple had five sons.
In the tradition of finches, for whom songs are passed from father to son and used to serenade potential mates, the sons learned their immigrant father’s tunes. But their father’s vocalizations were strange: he’d tried to mimick the natives, but accidentally introduced new notes and inflections, like a person who learns a song in a language he doesn’t understand.
These tunes set the sons apart, as did their unusual size. Though they found mates, it may only have taken a couple generations for the new lineage to ignore — or be ignored by — local finches, and breed only with each other. The Grants couldn’t tell for certain when this started, but they were certain after four generations, when a drought struck the island, killing all but a single brother and sister. They mated with each other, and their children did the same.
No exact rule exists for deciding when a group of animals constitutes a separate species. That question “is rarely if ever asked,” as speciation isn’t something that scientists have been fortunate enough to watch at the precise moment of divergence, except in bacteria and other simple creatures. But after at least three generations of reproductive isolation, the Grants felt comfortable in designating the new lineage as an incipient species.
The future of the species is far from certain. It’s possible that they’ll be out-competed by other finches on the island. Their initial gene pool may contain flaws that will be magnified with time. A chance disaster could wipe them out. The birds might even return to the fold of their parent species, and merge with them through interbreeding.
But whatever happens, their legacy will remain: New species can emerge very quickly — and sometimes all it takes is a song.
Re: The birth of a new species observed
Its still a finch though. It not like a pig popped out of the egg.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
- Elessarina
- Bearer of Anduril
- Posts: 9517
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 5:12 pm
- About me: The Fastest Ratz.. apparently
- Location: Rivendell
- Contact:
Re: The birth of a new species observed
Animavore wrote:Its still a finch though. It not like a pig popped out of the egg.

- klr
- (%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
- Posts: 32964
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
- About me: The money was just resting in my account.
- Location: Airstrip Two
- Contact:
Re: The birth of a new species observed
Rapture Ready has claimed its first victim.Animavore wrote:Its still a finch though. It not like a pig popped out of the egg.

God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers
It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner
The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner
The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson



Re: The birth of a new species observed
Animavore wrote:Its still a finch though. It not like a pig popped out of the egg.


- Elessarina
- Bearer of Anduril
- Posts: 9517
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 5:12 pm
- About me: The Fastest Ratz.. apparently
- Location: Rivendell
- Contact:
Re: The birth of a new species observed
Animavore wrote:Its still a finch though. It not like a pig popped out of the egg.
But which came first... the pig or the egg?
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: The birth of a new species observed
Moved to Science and Tech.
Re: The birth of a new species observed
God created all the animals fully formed. How would babies be able to look after themselves? They would all perish rather quickly and scupper God's plans. Jesus Christ! Its written in the FUCKING BIBLE. Why is this so difficult for some people to comprehend?Elessarina wrote:Animavore wrote:Its still a finch though. It not like a pig popped out of the egg.
But which came first... the pig or the egg?
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
Re: The birth of a new species observed
So how long until the Amish become their own species?
Nobody expects me...
- Bella Fortuna
- Sister Golden Hair
- Posts: 79685
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
- About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require. - Location: Scotlifornia
- Contact:
Re: The birth of a new species observed
When they can hatch a pig out of an egg without electricity.andrewclunn wrote:So how long until the Amish become their own species?
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/
Re: The birth of a new species observed
The fundies are going to say that they are the same type of bird, just as they have tried to explain Noah's Arc in terms of types of animal . 





Give me the wine , I don't need the bread
- Calilasseia
- Butterfly
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:31 pm
- About me: Destroyer of canards, and merciless shredder of bad ideas. :twisted:
- Location: 40,000 feet above you, dropping JDAMs
- Contact:
Re: The birth of a new species observed
Good luck to them with that one, given that no creationist has ever defined "kinds" in a manner that bears even the most tenuous of connections with taxonomic reality.Feck wrote:The fundies are going to say that they are the same type of bird, just as they have tried to explain Noah's Arc in terms of types of animal .
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: The birth of a new species observed
'Scuse me, but what does reality have to do with it?Calilasseia wrote:Good luck to them with that one, given that no creationist has ever defined "kinds" in a manner that bears even the most tenuous of connections with taxonomic reality.Feck wrote:The fundies are going to say that they are the same type of bird, just as they have tried to explain Noah's Arc in terms of types of animal .
- Calilasseia
- Butterfly
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:31 pm
- About me: Destroyer of canards, and merciless shredder of bad ideas. :twisted:
- Location: 40,000 feet above you, dropping JDAMs
- Contact:
Re: The birth of a new species observed
With creationists, nothing. But then that's why creationism is a crock of shit - it's based upon mythological blind assertion instead of diligent observation of reality.Gawdzilla wrote:'Scuse me, but what does reality have to do with it?Calilasseia wrote:Good luck to them with that one, given that no creationist has ever defined "kinds" in a manner that bears even the most tenuous of connections with taxonomic reality.Feck wrote:The fundies are going to say that they are the same type of bird, just as they have tried to explain Noah's Arc in terms of types of animal .
- angrychimp
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 12:36 pm
- About me: Round like a circle in a spiral
Like a wheel within a wheel
Never ending, nor beginning
And never spinning free - Location: Australia
- Contact:
Re: The birth of a new species observed
Brother and Sister mated?
Jerry!
Jerry!
Jerry!
Jerry!
Jerry!
Jerry!
"Religion. It's given people hope in a world torn apart by religion"
-John Stewart
"You know who's going to inherit the earth? Arms dealers. Because everyone else is too busy killing each other. That's the secret to survival. Never go to war, especially with yourself."
-Yuri Orlov
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests