What if Vegans are Actually Right?

Post Reply

It is good for the planet?

Hectic
1
4%
Bacon and Cheese
11
46%
Yes
7
29%
Cheese but not Bacon
2
8%
No
3
13%
 
Total votes: 24

User avatar
Sean Hayden
Microagressor
Posts: 18811
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
About me: recovering humanist
Contact:

Re: What if Vegans are Actually Right?

Post by Sean Hayden » Thu Jun 27, 2024 8:31 am

Basically if you buy it from the butcher it’s been minimally processed. If it’s been made into a steak slurry, piped into a plastic bucket, and is ready after 3-5 minutes on high, then it’s probably ultra processed.

One attempt at an actual definition I found:
industrial formulations of processed food substances (oils, fats, sugars, starch, protein isolates) that contain little or no whole food and typically include flavorings, colorings, emulsifiers, and other cosmetic additives.
It’s not difficult to imagine meat alternatives being ultra processed according to this definition.
"With less regulation on the margins we expect the financial sector to do well under the incoming administration” —money manager

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74025
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: What if Vegans are Actually Right?

Post by JimC » Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:14 am

The processing of food is a continuum, not a binary "processed vs non-processed"...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Sean Hayden
Microagressor
Posts: 18811
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
About me: recovering humanist
Contact:

Re: What if Vegans are Actually Right?

Post by Sean Hayden » Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:40 am

Well yeah, that’s even in the term ultra processed right, ultra being the extreme end of the scale…
"With less regulation on the margins we expect the financial sector to do well under the incoming administration” —money manager

User avatar
macdoc
Twitcher
Posts: 8751
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:20 pm
Location: BirdWing Home FNQ
Contact:

Re: What if Vegans are Actually Right?

Post by macdoc » Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:21 am

It’s not difficult to imagine meat alternatives being ultra processed according to this definition.
Imagining shows no basis for reasonable conclusion.
Image
Plant-based meat is rarely mentioned in landmark studies on UPFs, and in studies breaking down impact by food group, UPFs providing a source of fibre, such as plant-based meat were associated with reduced health risks. Given plant-based meat is so different in its nutritional makeup from the ‘average’ ultra-processed food, it seems unlikely the same findings can be generalised.

While more research is needed, studies that do focus on plant-based meat have found that eating it in place of conventional animal meat could:

Reduce risk of heart disease, the leading cause of death in Europe.
Reduce bowel cancer risk, the second leading cause of cancer death in Europe.
Improve gut health.
Help maintain a healthy weight.
snip
On the whole, evidence suggests that whether a plant-based meat product does or does not fall into the ultra-processed food category has little bearing on how healthy it is, and in fact, certain processing steps have been found to increase their nutritional value by adding or improving the bioavailability of important nutrients.

These studies do show that processed conventional meat specifically, unlike most ultra-processed food groups, is associated with specific downsides, supporting the argument that plant-based meat could offer people an easy way to reduce their overconsumption of processed conventional meat to recommended levels.
https://gfieurope.org/is-plant-based-me ... processed/

I'll stick with my BirdsEy substitutes but still seek a good burger made from beef on occasion. :biggrin:
Resident in Cairns Australia • Current ride> 2014 Honda CB500F • Travel photos https://500px.com/p/macdoc?view=galleries

User avatar
rasetsu
Ne'er-do-well
Posts: 5123
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:04 pm
About me: Move along. Nothing to see here.
Contact:

Re: What if Vegans are Actually Right?

Post by rasetsu » Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:41 am

"
macdoc wrote:
Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:21 am
It’s not difficult to imagine meat alternatives being ultra processed according to this definition.
Imagining shows no basis for reasonable conclusion.
Image
Plant-based meat is rarely mentioned in landmark studies on UPFs, and in studies breaking down impact by food group, UPFs providing a source of fibre, such as plant-based meat were associated with reduced health risks. Given plant-based meat is so different in its nutritional makeup from the ‘average’ ultra-processed food, it seems unlikely the same findings can be generalised.

While more research is needed, studies that do focus on plant-based meat have found that eating it in place of conventional animal meat could:

Reduce risk of heart disease, the leading cause of death in Europe.
Reduce bowel cancer risk, the second leading cause of cancer death in Europe.
Improve gut health.
Help maintain a healthy weight.
snip
On the whole, evidence suggests that whether a plant-based meat product does or does not fall into the ultra-processed food category has little bearing on how healthy it is, and in fact, certain processing steps have been found to increase their nutritional value by adding or improving the bioavailability of important nutrients.

These studies do show that processed conventional meat specifically, unlike most ultra-processed food groups, is associated with specific downsides, supporting the argument that plant-based meat could offer people an easy way to reduce their overconsumption of processed conventional meat to recommended levels.
https://gfieurope.org/is-plant-based-me ... processed/

I'll stick with my BirdsEy substitutes but still seek a good burger made from beef on occasion. :biggrin:
[emphasise mine]

If landmark studies don't include plant-based meat, what studies is the author appealing to for this 'evidence'?

Note that your graphic is based upon GFI'S own comparison, not an independent source.
About GFI Europe

The Good Food Institute Europe is an international nonprofit and think tank helping to build a more sustainable, secure and just food system by transforming meat production.

We work with scientists, businesses and policymakers to advance plant-based and cultivated meat – making them delicious, affordable and accessible across Europe.
.
.
Just as with conventional meat products, there is a lot of variation in the level of processing different plant-based meat options undergo. Some products available in Europe today fit the Nova 1 ‘minimally processed’ definition, while others fall into the Nova 4 ‘ultra-processed’ category.

The question of whether a given food is ultra-processed does not have a hard and fast answer.

ibid.

Gee, a pro-plant-based food organization has a pro-plant-based food view on the matter. I'm shocked.

User avatar
Strontium Dog
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:28 am
About me: Navy Seals are not seals
Location: Liverpool, UK
Contact:

Re: What if Vegans are Actually Right?

Post by Strontium Dog » Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:07 pm

The animal murder industry can't scaremonger about plant oestrogens in soya any more after it was politely pointed out to them that the Chinese have been eating soy for thousands of years, and they're a people so fertile their government literally had to pass a law to limit the number of children they have. So the latest wheeze is "processed foods", since a bunch of meat substitutes happen to be processed. Because obviously mashing up a mushroom turns it into a carcinogen, or something.
100% verifiable facts or your money back. Anti-fascist. Enemy of woo - theistic or otherwise. Cloth is not an antiviral. Imagination and fantasy is no substitute for tangible reality. Wishing doesn't make it real.

"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear" - George Orwell

"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!" - Barry Goldwater

User avatar
macdoc
Twitcher
Posts: 8751
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:20 pm
Location: BirdWing Home FNQ
Contact:

Re: What if Vegans are Actually Right?

Post by macdoc » Thu Jun 27, 2024 1:11 pm

As usual negative comment without a shred of support ....nothing new there. :thinks:

"Perhaps they have a point"....if that's kind of counter argument posited. :coffee:
Resident in Cairns Australia • Current ride> 2014 Honda CB500F • Travel photos https://500px.com/p/macdoc?view=galleries

User avatar
rasetsu
Ne'er-do-well
Posts: 5123
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:04 pm
About me: Move along. Nothing to see here.
Contact:

Re: What if Vegans are Actually Right?

Post by rasetsu » Thu Jun 27, 2024 1:22 pm

macdoc wrote:
Thu Jun 27, 2024 1:11 pm
As usual negative comment without a shred of support ....nothing new there. :thinks:

"Perhaps they have a point"....if that's kind of counter argument posited. :coffee:
Hahahahaha. I quoted your own source. You really are bereft of any sense.

aufbahrung
Posts: 2856
Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2019 4:10 pm
Contact:

Re: What if Vegans are Actually Right?

Post by aufbahrung » Thu Jun 27, 2024 1:37 pm

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/lifestyle ... h-33114142

https://www.firstpost.com/explainers/in ... 44392.html

If we were meant to eat plants we would be able to hear their screams as we decapitate them
no problem can withstand the assault of sustained thinking - voltaire

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39738
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: What if Vegans are Actually Right?

Post by Brian Peacock » Thu Jun 27, 2024 1:39 pm

macdoc wrote:
Thu Jun 27, 2024 7:23 am
Such as Brian or are you reverting to unsupported proclamations again
Can you try that one again in English please?
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39738
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: What if Vegans are Actually Right?

Post by Brian Peacock » Thu Jun 27, 2024 1:45 pm

pErvinalia wrote:
Thu Jun 27, 2024 7:31 am
What defines ultra processed food? What's "processed" actually mean?
From the article:
Monteiro and his colleagues first used the phrase UPF 15 years ago when designing the food classification system “Nova”. This assesses not only nutritional content but also the processes food undergoes before it is consumed.

The system places food and drink into four groups: minimally processed food, processed culinary ingredients, processed food and ultra-processed food.
The Nova classification system:
Wiki wrote:The Nova classification (Portuguese: nova classificação, 'new classification') is a framework for grouping edible substances based on the extent and purpose of food processing applied to them. Researchers at the University of São Paulo, Brazil, proposed the system in 2009.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova_classification
BMJ wrote:The NOVA categorizes all foods and food products into 4 groups based on the nature, extent and purpose of the physical, biological and chemical processes they have undergone following separation from nature...

https://nutrition.bmj.com/content/bmjnp ... rial-1.pdf
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
rasetsu
Ne'er-do-well
Posts: 5123
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:04 pm
About me: Move along. Nothing to see here.
Contact:

Re: What if Vegans are Actually Right?

Post by rasetsu » Thu Jun 27, 2024 2:01 pm

"Both proponents and opponents of Nova 'agree that food processing vitally affects human health', but not on its definition of ultra-processing."

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39738
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: What if Vegans are Actually Right?

Post by Brian Peacock » Thu Jun 27, 2024 2:33 pm

Strontium Dog wrote:
Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:07 pm
The animal murder industry can't scaremonger about plant oestrogens in soya any more after it was politely pointed out to them that the Chinese have been eating soy for thousands of years, and they're a people so fertile their government literally had to pass a law to limit the number of children they have. So the latest wheeze is "processed foods", since a bunch of meat substitutes happen to be processed. Because obviously mashing up a mushroom turns it into a carcinogen, or something.
You're right in the first part, but the article was about the health impacts of a specific class of products - Nova's "ultra-processed foods" rather than 'processed foods' generally. In fact, one might argue that cooking a carrot makes it a 'processed food', so understanding what UPFs are or might be specifically is important for a decent discussion on the matter.

Previously some anti-veg*n commenters in the thread have tried to forward the argument that one can only 'go vegan' by relying on processed meat substitutes or alternatives &/or that the relatively high level of processing involved in 'vegan food' renders them unhealthy, and that veganism is by extension an unhealthy diet. It is a silly argument, but it is in that context that I thought it was important to acknowledge that "There are a lot of 'plant-based || meat alternative' UPFs out there too." I didn't say "all" or "every" plant-based/meat alternative product is a UPF (though macdoc seems to have instantly leapt upon his high horse on the assumption that I did, or that this is what I really meant), and I also wanted to avoid the weak and lazy charge that, as the forum's token vegan, I was only posting the article to take a pop at meat eaters.

While it is true one could eat as unhealthily as a veg*n as one could as a meat-eater, it also seems rather uncontroversial to say that reducing the levels of UPFs in one's diet is a more healthy approach to eating than not - regardless of one's culinary inclinations. The article is about the possible adverse health implications of UPFs, noting that that those impacts have as much to do with things like access to high-quality, nutritious ingredients, age, convenience, and economic capacity as to the prevalence of UPF products in the marketplace and people's everyday diet.

Nonetheless, I posted the article in the Vegan thread because I think nutrition is really important, as well as thinking that a vegan diet focused on fresh ingredients and containing minimal processed foods is generally a healthy and sustainable approach to personal nutrition.

At this point someone usually posts, "You'll have to wrestle my sausage from my cold, dead hands" or similar. :tea:
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
Sean Hayden
Microagressor
Posts: 18811
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
About me: recovering humanist
Contact:

Re: What if Vegans are Actually Right?

Post by Sean Hayden » Thu Jun 27, 2024 2:53 pm

Sausage wraslin’!
"With less regulation on the margins we expect the financial sector to do well under the incoming administration” —money manager

User avatar
macdoc
Twitcher
Posts: 8751
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:20 pm
Location: BirdWing Home FNQ
Contact:

Re: What if Vegans are Actually Right?

Post by macdoc » Thu Jun 27, 2024 7:38 pm

Brian - I only responded to your lack of citations to support your regularly available "opinion". :bored:
Playing "victim" won't cut it....support your "proclamations" and I'll stop sniping....no high horse required. :coffee:
Resident in Cairns Australia • Current ride> 2014 Honda CB500F • Travel photos https://500px.com/p/macdoc?view=galleries

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests