Strontium Dog wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:07 pm
The animal murder industry can't scaremonger about plant oestrogens in soya any more after it was politely pointed out to them that the Chinese have been eating soy for thousands of years, and they're a people so fertile their government literally had to pass a law to limit the number of children they have. So the latest wheeze is "processed foods", since a bunch of meat substitutes happen to be processed. Because obviously mashing up a mushroom turns it into a carcinogen, or something.
You're right in the first part, but the article was about the health impacts of a specific class of products - Nova's "ultra-processed foods" rather than 'processed foods' generally. In fact, one might argue that cooking a carrot makes it a 'processed food', so understanding what UPFs are or might be specifically is important for a decent discussion on the matter.
Previously some anti-veg*n commenters in the thread have tried to forward the argument that one can only 'go vegan' by relying on processed meat substitutes or alternatives &/or that the relatively high level of processing involved in 'vegan food' renders them unhealthy, and that veganism is by extension an unhealthy diet. It is a silly argument, but it is in that context that I thought it was important to acknowledge that
"There are a lot of 'plant-based || meat alternative' UPFs out there too." I didn't say "all" or "every" plant-based/meat alternative product is a UPF (though macdoc seems to have instantly leapt upon his high horse on the assumption that I did, or that this is what I really meant), and I also wanted to avoid the weak and lazy charge that, as the forum's token vegan, I was only posting the article to take a pop at meat eaters.
While it is true one could eat as unhealthily as a veg*n as one could as a meat-eater, it also seems rather uncontroversial to say that reducing the levels of UPFs in one's diet is a more healthy approach to eating than not - regardless of one's culinary inclinations.
The article is about the possible adverse health implications of UPFs, noting that that those impacts have as much to do with things like access to high-quality, nutritious ingredients, age, convenience, and economic capacity as to the prevalence of UPF products in the marketplace and people's everyday diet.
Nonetheless, I posted the article in the Vegan thread because I think nutrition is really important, as well as thinking that a vegan diet focused on fresh ingredients and containing minimal processed foods is generally a healthy and sustainable approach to personal nutrition.
At this point someone usually posts, "You'll have to wrestle my sausage from my cold, dead hands" or similar.
