-
Sean Hayden
- Microagressor
- Posts: 17912
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
- About me: recovering humanist
-
Contact:
Post
by Sean Hayden » Sun Nov 18, 2018 5:36 pm
It’s probably best to get the bad news out of the way first. The so-called scientific method is a myth. That is not to say that scientists don’t do things that can be described and are unique to their fields of study. But to squeeze a diverse set of practices that span cultural anthropology, paleobotany, and theoretical physics into a handful of steps is an inevitable distortion and, to be blunt, displays a serious poverty of imagination. Easy to grasp, pocket-guide versions of the scientific method usually reduce to critical thinking, checking facts, or letting “nature speak for itself,” none of which is really all that uniquely scientific. If typical formulations were accurate, the only location true science would be taking place in would be grade-school classrooms.
...
Now for the good news. The scientific method is nothing but a piece of rhetoric. Granted, that may not appear to be good news at first, but it actually is. The scientific method as rhetoric is far more complex, interesting, and revealing than it is as a direct reflection of the ways scientists work. Rhetoric is not just words; rather, “just” words are powerful tools to help shape perception, manage the flow of resources and authority, and make certain kinds of actions or beliefs possible or impossible. That’s particularly true of what Raymond Williams called “keywords.” A list of modern-day keywords include “family,” “race,” “freedom,” and “science.” Such words are familiar, repeated again and again until it seems that everyone must know what they mean. At the same time, scratch their surface, and their meanings become full of messiness, variation, and contradiction.
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/ ... _Gg1_ZFymS
-
Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 38047
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
-
Contact:
Post
by Brian Peacock » Sun Nov 18, 2018 8:15 pm
Hmm. Seems to me that 'the scientific method' is too easily confused for a singular or particular 'method' when really it's a context-dependent approach to epistemological enquiry which necessitates the development of robust methodologies.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
-
Rum
- Absent Minded Processor
- Posts: 37285
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
- Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
-
Contact:
Post
by Rum » Sun Nov 18, 2018 8:35 pm
There is also the question of disciplines which aren't strictly 'science'. Archeology, sociology and the like come to mind. They might try to bring order to a set of available information but they aren't capable, generally speaking' of producing predictable, repeatable results.
-
rainbow
- Posts: 13534
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
- About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
- Location: Africa
-
Contact:
Post
by rainbow » Mon Nov 19, 2018 5:35 am
Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Sun Nov 18, 2018 8:15 pm
Hmm. Seems to me that 'the scientific method' is too easily confused for a singular or particular 'method' when really it's a context-dependent approach to epistemological enquiry which necessitates the development of robust
methodologies.
This involves a bucket and a stopwatch.
If different researchers get the same result within a margin of error, that error can be measured and statistically manipulated.
I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4
-
JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 73112
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
-
Contact:
Post
by JimC » Mon Nov 19, 2018 6:07 am
...but it sure beats predictions based on the entrails of sacrificed animals...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
-
rainbow
- Posts: 13534
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
- About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
- Location: Africa
-
Contact:
Post
by rainbow » Mon Nov 19, 2018 6:22 am
JimC wrote: ↑Mon Nov 19, 2018 6:07 am
...but it sure beats predictions based on the entrails of sacrificed animals...
...or meta-analysis.
I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4
-
Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
-
Contact:
Post
by Hermit » Mon Nov 19, 2018 8:43 am
Well, reading that article was a waste of time. Apparently it is chapter 26 of a book titled Newton's Apple and Other Myths about Science, which is squarely aimed at the unwashed masses with aspirations to educate themselves but little of the grey matter necessary to succeed. The author did not write anything about why scientific method is a myth. He just listed quotes of people who wrote that it was. HUP should be ashamed for publishing such waffle, but then Harvard University is an American university, and American universities have a keen eye for making money.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
-
Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 47370
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 15-32-25
- Location: USA
-
Contact:
Post
by Tero » Mon Nov 19, 2018 12:05 pm
Why would we need a scientific method? The Great Flood and and Noah’s Ark explain everything!
https://esapolitics.blogspot.com
http://esabirdsne.blogspot.com/
Said Peter...what you're requesting just isn't my bag
Said Daemon, who's sorry too, but y'see we didn't have no choice
And our hands they are many and we'd be of one voice
We've come all the way from Wigan to get up and state
Our case for survival before it's too late
Turn stone to bread, said Daemon Duncetan
Turn stone to bread right away...
-
cronus
- Black Market Analyst
- Posts: 18122
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:09 pm
- About me: Illis quos amo deserviam
- Location: United Kingdom
-
Contact:
Post
by cronus » Mon Nov 19, 2018 12:49 pm
Say the same about mathematics. It's been in a foundational crisis since the start of the 20th C and things ain't getting better despite the modern world depending upon it.
What will the world be like after its ruler is removed?
-
Rum
- Absent Minded Processor
- Posts: 37285
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
- Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
-
Contact:
Post
by Rum » Mon Nov 19, 2018 7:37 pm
Maths works and that is fine. If one just treats it as a tool and does stuff with it, then it is just dandy. The fact that nobody knows if maths is actually part of the fabric of the universe in some way or simply a very clever measuring stick invented by ape humans doesn't really matter, except for the pure mathematicians.
-
JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 73112
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
-
Contact:
Post
by JimC » Tue Nov 20, 2018 6:17 am
Cue me ranting that it is indeed part of the fabric of the universe, followed by snide remarks from Hermit...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
-
rainbow
- Posts: 13534
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
- About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
- Location: Africa
-
Contact:
Post
by rainbow » Tue Nov 20, 2018 7:06 am
JimC wrote: ↑Tue Nov 20, 2018 6:17 am
Cue me ranting that it is indeed part of the fabric of the universe, followed by snide remarks from Hermit...
That is what they want you to believe.
I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4
-
Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 47370
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 15-32-25
- Location: USA
-
Contact:
Post
by Tero » Tue Nov 20, 2018 3:18 pm
Math is just fake science. It lacks units of measurement.
https://esapolitics.blogspot.com
http://esabirdsne.blogspot.com/
Said Peter...what you're requesting just isn't my bag
Said Daemon, who's sorry too, but y'see we didn't have no choice
And our hands they are many and we'd be of one voice
We've come all the way from Wigan to get up and state
Our case for survival before it's too late
Turn stone to bread, said Daemon Duncetan
Turn stone to bread right away...
-
laklak
- Posts: 20988
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
- About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
- Location: Tannhauser Gate
-
Contact:
Post
by laklak » Tue Nov 20, 2018 9:24 pm
It's a construct of the Patriarchy.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.
-
Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
-
Contact:
Post
by Hermit » Tue Nov 20, 2018 9:33 pm
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests