

andrewclunn wrote:Clinton Huxley wrote:andrewclunn wrote:Clinton Huxley wrote:Does the correlation hold for moobs?
Really? I expected something a bit snarkier from you Mr. Huxley. Something like, "When you're too fat to have friends and so you have to sit at home and read all day..." Or perhaps, "When you're so malnurished that you don't develop proper breasts like a real woman..."
Mr Huxley?!? Too formal by half!
Damn. Well I guess that means I'm not today's foe.

Ayaan wrote:Maybe, according to this study.
http://www.helium.com/items/2123745-wom ... re-smarterA study by a Chicago university sociologist of 1,200 women found that large-breasted women tend to have higher intelligence. The study divided the women into five groups ranging from virtually flat-chested to extra-large breasts.
The results revealed that the big-breasted women had an overall higher I.Q.—about 10 points—than the lesser endowed members of the study. Women with average-sized breasts also beat out those that were in the smallest size group.
rachelbean wrote:Sometimes I get distracted by my own cleavage.

Svartalf wrote:No offence to whom you guess, but some of the smartest girls I've known were rather petite chested.
I suspect that the study was incorrectly administered and resulted in unfair bias.
Trinity wrote:Svartalf wrote:No offence to whom you guess, but some of the smartest girls I've known were rather petite chested.
I suspect that the study was incorrectly administered and resulted in unfair bias.
Indeed, I can't see the relevance of such a study; women are obviously different from one another,coming in all shapes and sizes, there is no "norm" and if there is no physical norm how can there be a suggestion that breast size and intelligence are related? When will so-called scientific studies stop trying to generalise/average human beings and concentrate on things that DO matter . It's not as if a woman is going to be able to improve/diminish her intelligence (if it was associated with breast size) by having implants or reductions is it? FFS.


lordpasternack wrote:Yeah - I fuckin' love oppressin' ma wimmin, like I love chowin' on ma bacon and tuggin' on ma ol' cock…
Pappa wrote:God is a cunt! I wank over pictures of Jesus! I love Darwin so much I'd have sex with his bones!!!!

rachelbean wrote:Well, I've got big boobs and I'm smart so it must be true

rachelbean wrote:Well, I've got big boobs and I'm smart so it must be true

rachelbean wrote:Well, I've got big boobs and I'm smart so it must be true
Bella Fortuna wrote:"Hey - my brains are up HERE, buddy!"
The "study" seems completely valueless as far as I can see. Even if in the few thousand test subjects, a trend was observed, that is not nearly enough data or sample size to make accurate assumptions. Especially if it was all conducted in one area. In the end if it did turn out to be correct, was would be the use of the data? To know that if you have certain genes you may have an IQ score a few points higher than others? Not exactly the kind of science that seems worth funding 
lordpasternack wrote:Yeah - I fuckin' love oppressin' ma wimmin, like I love chowin' on ma bacon and tuggin' on ma ol' cock…
Pappa wrote:God is a cunt! I wank over pictures of Jesus! I love Darwin so much I'd have sex with his bones!!!!

Return to Science, Technology & Environment
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests