New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

User avatar
Schneibster
Asker of inconvenient questions
Posts: 3976
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:22 pm
About me: I hate cranks.
Location: Late. I'm always late.
Contact:

New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Schneibster » Fri Nov 18, 2011 1:18 am

New studies of the geohistory of the Deccan Traps megavolcano eruptions in India 65 million years ago have shown that the climate changes spurred by the vast quantities of CO2, sulphur dioxide, and ash released into the atmosphere as over half of the Indian subcontinent was covered by lava flows that went on for some 35 thousand years were sufficient by themselves to cause the KT mass extinction. Until now, there had not been sufficient evidence to overturn the Chicxulub asteroid impact as the culprit, but more exact and deeper study of the geology of the Deccan Traps and the surrounding regions' paleobiology, specifically of foraminifera species diversity, has shown that the impact of the eruption was overall much larger than that of any impactor including Chicxulub.

Current thinking is that the combination of the two, potentially along with other impacts one of which was found not far from the Deccan, was the reason that the mass extinction was raised to the status of one of the two worst in Earth's history.

It is worthy of note, however, that this is an ongoing controversy. A panel of paleontologists came down on the side of the impact theory in 2010, and there has not yet been adequate time for criticism of the latest Deccan data. So this will be an ongoing story.

Science Daily has a pretty good article on the controversy and the latest evidence here. Enjoy.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. -Thomas Jefferson
Image

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51321
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Tero » Fri Nov 18, 2011 1:23 am

Sounds reasonable.

I was never a meteor fan.

User avatar
Horwood Beer-Master
"...a complete Kentish hog"
Posts: 7061
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:34 pm
Location: Wandering somewhere around the Darenth Valley - Kent
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Horwood Beer-Master » Fri Nov 18, 2011 1:50 am

Are they speculating that without Chicxulub the impact of the Deccan eruptions would have eventually killed off all the KT victims, or are they saying that the vast bulk of these species in fact were extinct prior to Chicxulub?

If it's the former than surely we must still declare Chicxulub the killer. I mean if you're beaten to within an inch of your life and then shot in the head, your cause of death is still is the gunshot wound, not the beating - even if you most likely would have died in the end if you'd just been left there.
Image

User avatar
Don't Panic
Evil Admin
Evil Admin
Posts: 10653
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:19 am
About me: 100% Pure Evil. (Not from Concentrate)
Location: Luimneach, Eire
Contact:

New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Don't Panic » Fri Nov 18, 2011 1:57 am

Anyone put out the theory that the impact caused the eruptions?
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome. I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And . . . the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.
D.N.A.

User avatar
Schneibster
Asker of inconvenient questions
Posts: 3976
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:22 pm
About me: I hate cranks.
Location: Late. I'm always late.
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Schneibster » Fri Nov 18, 2011 2:01 am

Horwood Beer-Master wrote:Are they speculating that without Chicxulub the impact of the Deccan eruptions would have eventually killed off all the KT victims, or are they saying that the vast bulk of these species in fact were extinct prior to Chicxulub?
I don't think they have gotten that far. They've said so far that the impact of the Deccan eruptions was enough.
Horwood Beer-Master wrote:If it's the former than surely we must still declare Chicxulub the killer. I mean if you're beaten to within an inch of your life and then shot in the head, your cause of death is still is the gunshot wound, not the beating - even if you most likely would have died in the end if you'd just been left there.
False analogy; it's not one death, it's billions (and that's not counting foraminifera).
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. -Thomas Jefferson
Image

User avatar
Schneibster
Asker of inconvenient questions
Posts: 3976
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:22 pm
About me: I hate cranks.
Location: Late. I'm always late.
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Schneibster » Fri Nov 18, 2011 2:03 am

Don't Panic wrote:Anyone put out the theory that the impact caused the eruptions?
I don't think it's big enough.

ETA: IIRC the timing's right, though. Chicxulub happened before the second phase of Deccan I think. Part of the problem with associating it directly with the KT boundary is that it's a few hundred thousand years too early.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. -Thomas Jefferson
Image

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74174
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by JimC » Fri Nov 18, 2011 2:57 am

Schneibster wrote:
Don't Panic wrote:Anyone put out the theory that the impact caused the eruptions?
I don't think it's big enough.

ETA: IIRC the timing's right, though. Chicxulub happened before the second phase of Deccan I think. Part of the problem with associating it directly with the KT boundary is that it's a few hundred thousand years too early.
I'm sure I've read an account in NewScientist that suggested that the impact may have triggered a phase of Deccan, in the sense that if the magma build up was almost ready to blow, the impact could have tipped the balance...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Schneibster
Asker of inconvenient questions
Posts: 3976
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:22 pm
About me: I hate cranks.
Location: Late. I'm always late.
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Schneibster » Fri Nov 18, 2011 3:16 am

I think I recall the same article.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. -Thomas Jefferson
Image

User avatar
Horwood Beer-Master
"...a complete Kentish hog"
Posts: 7061
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:34 pm
Location: Wandering somewhere around the Darenth Valley - Kent
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Horwood Beer-Master » Fri Nov 18, 2011 3:27 am

Schneibster wrote:...
Horwood Beer-Master wrote:If it's the former than surely we must still declare Chicxulub the killer. I mean if you're beaten to within an inch of your life and then shot in the head, your cause of death is still is the gunshot wound, not the beating - even if you most likely would have died in the end if you'd just been left there.
False analogy; it's not one death, it's billions (and that's not counting foraminifera).
An analogy doesn't have to be perfect to be valid enough.

If the vast bulk of the KT victim species were still extant the day before Chicxulub, but most were extinct, say, 3 weeks later - then I'd think it was fair to say it were the bullet-in-the-head wot done it.
Image

User avatar
Schneibster
Asker of inconvenient questions
Posts: 3976
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:22 pm
About me: I hate cranks.
Location: Late. I'm always late.
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Schneibster » Fri Nov 18, 2011 3:34 am

Horwood Beer-Master wrote:
Schneibster wrote:...
Horwood Beer-Master wrote:If it's the former than surely we must still declare Chicxulub the killer. I mean if you're beaten to within an inch of your life and then shot in the head, your cause of death is still is the gunshot wound, not the beating - even if you most likely would have died in the end if you'd just been left there.
False analogy; it's not one death, it's billions (and that's not counting foraminifera).
An analogy doesn't have to be perfect to be valid enough.
Unfortunately, this one doesn't qualify.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. -Thomas Jefferson
Image

User avatar
Horwood Beer-Master
"...a complete Kentish hog"
Posts: 7061
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:34 pm
Location: Wandering somewhere around the Darenth Valley - Kent
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Horwood Beer-Master » Fri Nov 18, 2011 3:37 am

Schneibster wrote:
Horwood Beer-Master wrote:
Schneibster wrote:...
Horwood Beer-Master wrote:If it's the former than surely we must still declare Chicxulub the killer. I mean if you're beaten to within an inch of your life and then shot in the head, your cause of death is still is the gunshot wound, not the beating - even if you most likely would have died in the end if you'd just been left there.
False analogy; it's not one death, it's billions (and that's not counting foraminifera).
An analogy doesn't have to be perfect to be valid enough.
Unfortunately, this one doesn't qualify.
Meaning?
Image

User avatar
Don't Panic
Evil Admin
Evil Admin
Posts: 10653
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:19 am
About me: 100% Pure Evil. (Not from Concentrate)
Location: Luimneach, Eire
Contact:

New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Don't Panic » Fri Nov 18, 2011 12:09 pm

JimC wrote:
Schneibster wrote:
Don't Panic wrote:Anyone put out the theory that the impact caused the eruptions?
I don't think it's big enough.

ETA: IIRC the timing's right, though. Chicxulub happened before the second phase of Deccan I think. Part of the problem with associating it directly with the KT boundary is that it's a few hundred thousand years too early.
I'm sure I've read an account in NewScientist that suggested that the impact may have triggered a phase of Deccan, in the sense that if the magma build up was almost ready to blow, the impact could have tipped the balance...
I was thinking that it's pretty much the other side of the world, shock waves hitting a weak point from multiple directions at once.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome. I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And . . . the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.
D.N.A.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Fri Nov 18, 2011 12:12 pm

Anybody care to speculate on how long the "nuclear winter" was, if it happened? If the planet was in trouble from the Deccan, the asteroid impact would make it worse. Same thing if the sequence is reversed. So a nuclear winter would be bad, but for how long.

My guess is less that three years, because that's how long the reptilians that survived would be able to hibernate.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Faithfree
The Potable Atheist
Posts: 16173
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:58 am
About me: All things in moderation, including moderation
Location: Planet of the grapes
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Faithfree » Fri Nov 18, 2011 12:49 pm

Why doesn't it surprise me that Gerta Keller is involved. :fp2:

I should explain that in a previous life in academia I did lots of research on impact-related stuff and got very familiar with the K-T mass extinction, although I didn't work on that specifically. I think impact as the main cause is a very water tight case, but of course I'm always open to new evidence so it would be interesting to read the actual paper rather than the media hype. The debate about the involvement of the Decan Traps has been very long, very tedious, and previously always toothless, but I'd like to see what the new paper has to offer. Though I doubt I'll be convinced.
Although it may look like a forum, this site is actually a crowd-sourced science project modelling the slow but inexorable heat death of the universe.

User avatar
Schneibster
Asker of inconvenient questions
Posts: 3976
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:22 pm
About me: I hate cranks.
Location: Late. I'm always late.
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Schneibster » Fri Nov 18, 2011 3:25 pm

Faithfree wrote:Why doesn't it surprise me that Gerta Keller is involved. :fp2:

I should explain that in a previous life in academia I did lots of research on impact-related stuff and got very familiar with the K-T mass extinction, although I didn't work on that specifically. I think impact as the main cause is a very water tight case, but of course I'm always open to new evidence so it would be interesting to read the actual paper rather than the media hype. The debate about the involvement of the Decan Traps has been very long, very tedious, and previously always toothless, but I'd like to see what the new paper has to offer. Though I doubt I'll be convinced.
The evidence sounds pretty good in this case. There are and have always been timing problems between the Chicxulub event and the beginning of the extinction event in the geological record. And the study of plankton is pretty definitive that there were big problems for a much longer time than the single asteroid strike can explain.
Journal References:

G. Keller, T. Adatte, S. Gardin, A. Bartolini, S. Bajpai. Main Deccan volcanism phase ends near the K–T boundary: Evidence from the Krishna–Godavari Basin, SE India. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2008; 268 (3-4): 293 DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.01.015
B. Gertsch, G. Keller, T. Adatte, R. Garg, V. Prasad, Z. Berner, D. Fleitmann. Environmental effects of Deccan volcanism across the Cretaceous–Tertiary transition in Meghalaya, India. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2011; 310 (3-4): 272 DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.08.015
I embedded the links.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. -Thomas Jefferson
Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 5 guests