Conspiracy Theories

[Cunt]

I believe that you have not commented on any of the facts he reported.

Despite your preference for focusing on me rather than the subject, I'll give you one. I believe that Stone and Maher had that exchange, and it was published.

Your turn!

[Joe]

Poor Cunt, he has no facts and this rot has been thoughoughly debunked.

The Pentagon didn’t ‘admit’ that there are 46 US-funded biolabs in Ukraine
Theory About U.S.-Funded Bioweapons Labs in Ukraine Is Unfounded
Social Media Posts Misrepresent U.S.-Ukraine Threat Reduction Program
Ukraine war: Fact-checking Russia's biological weapons claims
Fact Check: No evidence of biological weapons in Ukraine
Ukraine, US Biolabs, and an Ongoing Russian Disinformation Campaign
U.S. Biological Weapons in Ukraine—Separating the Facts From the Fiction
Fact check: Why Russian claims about US biolabs in Ukraine don't hold up
Unproven claims of US-funded Ukraine bioweapons labs spread online
FAKE: Victoria Nuland admitted that US has biolabs in Ukraine
Fact Check: No, There Are No U.S.-Funded Bioweapons Labs in Ukraine
Fact-checking Russian claims of US labs making lethal biological weapons in Ukraine
No, Hunter Biden was not financing bio-labs in Ukraine

Queue whining about fact checkers in 3...2...1...

[Cunt]

I had a quick look at one.

These institutions are not involved in the development of chemical or biological weapons. On the contrary, the United States has initiated a program to prevent the development of such weapons. The fact is that the Soviet Union had its own biological weapons program. After its collapse, dangerous biological materials remained on the territory of Ukraine. The U.S. program aims to ensure that these materials are not stolen or used for non-research purposes. Until 2014, the program also extended to russian laboratories.

So rather than destroying the dangerous weapons, the US teamed up with Ukraine to keep them safe. Not to be used for 'non-research purposes'.

No need to continue hunting for words that sound like they refute a conspiracy theory.

Why not admit the labs were funded by the US, and contained weapons? It sure looks like it from your 'fact-check'.

[rasetsu]

I believe that you have not commented on any of the facts he reported.

Despite your preference for focusing on me rather than the subject, I'll give you one. I believe that Stone and Maher had that exchange, and it was published.

Your turn!

That's nice. What facts besides that do you believe Bioclandestine reported?

Or are we back to trolling?

[Cunt]

I offered one fact that I believe.

Then left it in your court.

On to the next conspiracy theory:

The officials who hid the client list from the convicted child sex traffickers, are still hiding things from you.

That's just a fact, but the conspiracy theory is that people still trust those 'trusted officials'.

[Joe]

I had a quick look at one.

These institutions are not involved in the development of chemical or biological weapons. On the contrary, the United States has initiated a program to prevent the development of such weapons. The fact is that the Soviet Union had its own biological weapons program. After its collapse, dangerous biological materials remained on the territory of Ukraine. The U.S. program aims to ensure that these materials are not stolen or used for non-research purposes. Until 2014, the program also extended to russian laboratories.

So rather than destroying the dangerous weapons, the US teamed up with Ukraine to keep them safe. Not to be used for 'non-research purposes'.

No need to continue hunting for words that sound like they refute a conspiracy theory.

Why not admit the labs were funded by the US, and contained weapons? It sure looks like it from your 'fact-check'.

Yeah, which one, or are you just cherry-picking and running away by changing the subject?

Also, if you don't address each article, I'm not accepting anything from you. Your theory is still unproven.

[Cunt]

So you don't know the contents of the links you provided. OK, I don't feel too bad for skipping most of your 'fact-checks'.
https://voxukraine.org/en/fake-victoria ... in-ukraine

During them, Senator Marco Rubio asked Victoria Nuland whether Ukraine has biological or chemical weapons. The Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs did not claim that Ukraine had such weapons. Instead, she only said that there are laboratories in Ukraine whose materials could become dangerous in the hands of the russian aggressor.

So they weren't 'weapons'. Unless Russia gets hold of them. Then they were. Or something.

[Cunt]

Your theory is still unproven.

I didn't offer to prove a theory for you.

Did you read the title of the thread before leaping to defend government officials?

[Brian Peacock]

So nothing about the facts he mentions. Got it.

What facts would those be?

I don't know how you mean that. Do you mean you can't discern his fact-claims from his opinion?

Did Stone really meet with Maher, and that meeting published on video?

Which facts does he mention?

[Brian Peacock]

I believe that you have not commented on any of the facts he reported.

Which facts do you think require scrutiny and comment, and why?

[Cunt]

I believe that you have not commented on any of the facts he reported.

Which facts do you think require scrutiny and comment, and why?

None.

I'm just commenting on the fact that most comments are about the man, rather than something about the conspiracy theory.

Do you think any of the facts Stone and Maher discussed are interesting? Or are you just popping by to say hi?

[Brian Peacock]

Your theory is still unproven.

I didn't offer to prove a theory for you.

Did you read the title of the thread before leaping to defend government officials?

Why do you think that not accepting your unsubstantiated claims is equivalent to defending the government?

[Joe]

Your theory is still unproven.

I didn't offer to prove a theory for you.

Did you read the title of the thread before leaping to defend government officials?

Offer?

If you want ot be believed, you are required to prove the theory you advocated. That's just how it works with educated adults.

It's clear from your weaseling attempts to divert attention that you can't do it. Don't feel bad partner, the Russians came up short too. They took their claims to the UN Security Council and were only able to get one other country to vote with them for an investigation. Eight of the fifteen councilmembers cited lack of evidence for not supporting the Russian motion.

So Putin's got no evidence, and all you offer are dishonest rhetorical ploys, and yet you imply that we're the goosesteppers. It sounds like you're following your boy BioWhatsit pretty blindly there. That's quite the affectation, eh?

[Brian Peacock]

I believe that you have not commented on any of the facts he reported.

Which facts do you think require scrutiny and comment, and why?

None.

I'm just commenting on the fact that most comments are about the man, rather than something about the conspiracy theory.

Do you think any of the facts Stone and Maher discussed are interesting? Or are you just popping by to say hi?

On what grounds do you believe that unsubstantiated claims stand as something that is known or proved to be true? Perhaps I should be asking what your definition of 'facts' is?

[aufbahrung]

Water on the inside and outside, surface will flip around like venus. Heard it here first. Planet is screwed.