OK conspiracy theorists - get out of this! Moon landings!

[Coito ergo sum]

2.37 to 2.45 Astronaut wade's past the flag and it wafts in a pure vacuum. Amateurs.

Looks like the astronaut who passed in front of the flag lightly brushed it with his left arm.

[Atheist-Lite]

2.37 to 2.45 Astronaut wade's past the flag and it wafts in a pure vacuum. Amateurs.

Looks like the astronaut who passed in front of the flag lightly brushed it with his left arm.

He's closing on half the size putting the flag in place (sorry to crush the idea).

[Seth]

It was all a hoax. Land on the Moon? As if! Moon!

The really tricky part was persuading the Roosians to keep schtum

It's plainly obvious that we never went to the Moon. No green cheese was ever brought back.

And where there is cheese, there must be bacon, and we've seen none of that either.

[Mr P]

Looks like perfect pendulum motion in a vacuum to me caused by the astronaut bouncing past and disturbing the ground

[Rum]

If nobody went to the moon how did they get that bomber there!?

[Atheist-Lite]

Looks like perfect pendulum motion in a vacuum to me caused by the astronaut bouncing past and disturbing the ground

A site with unstable geology then or was the ground wet? It's a wonder the lunar lander didn't tip over....solve one problem with this kind of equation and you get two free. How's it feel to be on the defensive?

[Coito ergo sum]

2.37 to 2.45 Astronaut wade's past the flag and it wafts in a pure vacuum. Amateurs.

Looks like the astronaut who passed in front of the flag lightly brushed it with his left arm.

He's closing on half the size putting the flag in place (sorry to crush the idea).

You didn't crush the idea. The perspective looks about right. And, in a weightless environment, all it would take is a slight touch.

It definitely doesn't look like like a flag would look if it was moved due to air flow. The movement of the flag is too rigid for that.

[Schneibster]

He touched it. It's held out with steel rods. It's springy.

ETA: Probably didn't feel it thru his space suit.

[Rum]

With no air resistance on the moon something set swinging will remain doing so for a great deal longer than on earth.

[Atheist-Lite]

2.37 to 2.45 Astronaut wade's past the flag and it wafts in a pure vacuum. Amateurs.

Looks like the astronaut who passed in front of the flag lightly brushed it with his left arm.

He's closing on half the size putting the flag in place (sorry to crush the idea).

You didn't crush the idea. The perspective looks about right. And, in a weightless environment, all it would take is a slight touch.

It definitely doesn't look like like a flag would look if it was moved due to air flow. The movement of the flag is too rigid for that.

A reflection of the material and the construction. The movement is constained by the top bar. I'm not going into the 'hoax hypothesis' as a whole but this specific sequence took place in a atmosphere. I would like some expensive software to model this for precise distances and measures...I'm sure there's at least four maybe six feet between the astranaut and the flag.

[FBM]

2.37 to 2.45 Astronaut wade's past the flag and it wafts in a pure vacuum. Amateurs.

The moon has an atmosphere. Please don't challenge this statement, because I don't want to look it up. Thank you for your cooperation.

[Mr P]

Looks like perfect pendulum motion in a vacuum to me caused by the astronaut bouncing past and disturbing the ground

A site with unstable geology then or was the ground wet? It's a wonder the lunar lander didn't tip over....solve one problem with this kind of equation and you get two free. How's it feel to be on the defensive?

Still looks like it's moving in a vacuum, it can still do that in a stable geology when disturbed.

[Rum]

2.37 to 2.45 Astronaut wade's past the flag and it wafts in a pure vacuum. Amateurs.

Looks like the astronaut who passed in front of the flag lightly brushed it with his left arm.

He's closing on half the size putting the flag in place (sorry to crush the idea).

You didn't crush the idea. The perspective looks about right. And, in a weightless environment, all it would take is a slight touch.

It definitely doesn't look like like a flag would look if it was moved due to air flow. The movement of the flag is too rigid for that.

A reflection of the material and the construction. The movement is constained by the top bar. I'm not going into the 'hoax hypothesis' as a whole but this specific sequence took place in a atmosphere. I would like some expensive software to model this for precise distances and measures...I'm sure there's at least four maybe six feet between the astranaut and the flag.

The indefinite article prior to a noun is usually followed by the letter 'n' when the following noun begins with a vowel.

[Atheist-Lite]

2.37 to 2.45 Astronaut wade's past the flag and it wafts in a pure vacuum. Amateurs.

The moon has an atmosphere. Please don't challenge this statement, because I don't want to look it up. Thank you for your cooperation.

[Schneibster]

Surface pressure 10−7 Pa (day)
10−10 Pa (night)
Composition Ar, He, Na, K, H, Rn

It's in the Wikipedia article. Gee, that was tough.

Next?