One way mission to the moon

User avatar
Don't Panic
Evil Admin
Evil Admin
Posts: 10653
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:19 am
About me: 100% Pure Evil. (Not from Concentrate)
Location: Luimneach, Eire
Contact:

Re: One way mission to the moon

Post by Don't Panic » Sun Dec 12, 2010 4:07 pm

Meekychuppet wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
Meekychuppet wrote:Did you see the state of US space exploration before the Moon landings? I wouldn't right China off on that basis. I don't think anyone will go, but if there is a 'most likely to' it would be China.
I don't think China will have a problem with taking even more risks than the US took in the Moon race. I wouldn't be at all surprised if their lunatics were ordered to make "I didn't make it, but the next brave Chinese astronaut will, so keep on trying while I lay here dying" videos before they go.
Quite possibly, but I just don't see why China would go. If its to assert some sort of dominance, they've already America by the balls anyway.
If they can establish any sort of permanent settlement there then they might decide that they kinda like the place enough to keep it.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome. I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And . . . the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.
D.N.A.

User avatar
Atheist-Lite
Formerly known as Crumple
Posts: 8745
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:35 pm
About me: You need a jetpack? Here, take mine. I don't need a jetpack this far away.
Location: In the Galactic Hub, Yes That One !!!
Contact:

Re: One way mission to the moon

Post by Atheist-Lite » Sun Dec 12, 2010 4:32 pm

Don't Panic wrote:
Meekychuppet wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
Meekychuppet wrote:Did you see the state of US space exploration before the Moon landings? I wouldn't right China off on that basis. I don't think anyone will go, but if there is a 'most likely to' it would be China.
I don't think China will have a problem with taking even more risks than the US took in the Moon race. I wouldn't be at all surprised if their lunatics were ordered to make "I didn't make it, but the next brave Chinese astronaut will, so keep on trying while I lay here dying" videos before they go.
Quite possibly, but I just don't see why China would go. If its to assert some sort of dominance, they've already America by the balls anyway.
If they can establish any sort of permanent settlement there then they might decide that they kinda like the place enough to keep it.
They'd be lunatics to try, oops they are already aren't they?
nxnxm,cm,m,fvmf,vndfnm,nm,f,dvm,v v vmfm,vvm,d,dd vv sm,mvd,fmf,fn ,v fvfm,

User avatar
Don't Panic
Evil Admin
Evil Admin
Posts: 10653
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:19 am
About me: 100% Pure Evil. (Not from Concentrate)
Location: Luimneach, Eire
Contact:

Re: One way mission to the moon

Post by Don't Panic » Sun Dec 12, 2010 4:52 pm

Kevin wrote:
Don't Panic wrote:
Meekychuppet wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
Meekychuppet wrote:Did you see the state of US space exploration before the Moon landings? I wouldn't right China off on that basis. I don't think anyone will go, but if there is a 'most likely to' it would be China.
I don't think China will have a problem with taking even more risks than the US took in the Moon race. I wouldn't be at all surprised if their lunatics were ordered to make "I didn't make it, but the next brave Chinese astronaut will, so keep on trying while I lay here dying" videos before they go.
Quite possibly, but I just don't see why China would go. If its to assert some sort of dominance, they've already America by the balls anyway.
If they can establish any sort of permanent settlement there then they might decide that they kinda like the place enough to keep it.
They'd be lunatics to try, oops they are already aren't they?
A permanent base at the top of a gravity well, with at least 2 days warning of anyone approaching.

Don't know about mad.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome. I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And . . . the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.
D.N.A.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: One way mission to the moon

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sun Dec 12, 2010 4:55 pm

Two day warning if they noticed the incoming. A Trident nuke would not be easy to spot.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Don't Panic
Evil Admin
Evil Admin
Posts: 10653
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:19 am
About me: 100% Pure Evil. (Not from Concentrate)
Location: Luimneach, Eire
Contact:

Re: One way mission to the moon

Post by Don't Panic » Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:05 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:Two day warning if they noticed the incoming. A Trident nuke would not be easy to spot.
The boost phase would be visible, a thermal bloom isn't all the difficult to spot.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome. I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And . . . the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.
D.N.A.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: One way mission to the moon

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:07 pm

Don't Panic wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:Two day warning if they noticed the incoming. A Trident nuke would not be easy to spot.
The boost phase would be visible, a thermal bloom isn't all the difficult to spot.
Even if launched from the ISS?
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Don't Panic
Evil Admin
Evil Admin
Posts: 10653
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:19 am
About me: 100% Pure Evil. (Not from Concentrate)
Location: Luimneach, Eire
Contact:

Re: One way mission to the moon

Post by Don't Panic » Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:14 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:
Don't Panic wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:Two day warning if they noticed the incoming. A Trident nuke would not be easy to spot.
The boost phase would be visible, a thermal bloom isn't all the difficult to spot.
Even if launched from the ISS?
One orbital launch option to monitor, and anything ground based will be easy to spot. Not all that difficult, a large radar array on Earth pointed at ISS would help too.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome. I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And . . . the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.
D.N.A.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: One way mission to the moon

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:15 pm

Don't Panic wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
Don't Panic wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:Two day warning if they noticed the incoming. A Trident nuke would not be easy to spot.
The boost phase would be visible, a thermal bloom isn't all the difficult to spot.
Even if launched from the ISS?
One orbital launch option to monitor, and anything ground based will be easy to spot. Not all that difficult, a large radar array on Earth pointed at ISS would help too.
Second what-if. Boost to orbit, fake being a satellite until it's on the other side of the planet, then go to lunar burn.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Don't Panic
Evil Admin
Evil Admin
Posts: 10653
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:19 am
About me: 100% Pure Evil. (Not from Concentrate)
Location: Luimneach, Eire
Contact:

Re: One way mission to the moon

Post by Don't Panic » Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:21 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:
Don't Panic wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
Don't Panic wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:Two day warning if they noticed the incoming. A Trident nuke would not be easy to spot.
The boost phase would be visible, a thermal bloom isn't all the difficult to spot.
Even if launched from the ISS?
One orbital launch option to monitor, and anything ground based will be easy to spot. Not all that difficult, a large radar array on Earth pointed at ISS would help too.
Second what-if. Boost to orbit, fake being a satellite until it's on the other side of the planet, then go to lunar burn.
Yep, that one would work, make sure China is on the moon side of the planet when you're doing the burn and it would be dark and in the right trajectory before anyone spotted it. Be a case of radar attempting to spot a small fast moving target after that.

However that would start a war on Earth.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome. I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And . . . the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.
D.N.A.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: One way mission to the moon

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:25 pm

Maybe start a war if they figure out who did it. Allah could have commanded a strike from Pakistan.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Don't Panic
Evil Admin
Evil Admin
Posts: 10653
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:19 am
About me: 100% Pure Evil. (Not from Concentrate)
Location: Luimneach, Eire
Contact:

Re: One way mission to the moon

Post by Don't Panic » Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:31 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:Maybe start a war if they figure out who did it. Allah could have commanded a strike from Pakistan.
If a Chinese lunar base got nuked, I think the USA could expect a response in kind, an accurate strike on a small lunar base with an Earth launched missile isn't really the same as a missile that can lob a nuke a few thousand miles.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome. I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And . . . the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.
D.N.A.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: One way mission to the moon

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:34 pm

Don't Panic wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:Maybe start a war if they figure out who did it. Allah could have commanded a strike from Pakistan.
If a Chinese lunar base got nuked, I think the USA could expect a response in kind, an accurate strike on a small lunar base with an Earth launched missile isn't really the same as a missile that can lob a nuke a few thousand miles.
And they couldn't buy the technology? Remember, the base isn't built yet, so you have a technology gap of more than a few years to consider. Then add in the privatization of space and a middle man to buy a vehicle or vehicles to get a nuke to the moon and viola.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Don't Panic
Evil Admin
Evil Admin
Posts: 10653
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:19 am
About me: 100% Pure Evil. (Not from Concentrate)
Location: Luimneach, Eire
Contact:

Re: One way mission to the moon

Post by Don't Panic » Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:42 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:
Don't Panic wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:Maybe start a war if they figure out who did it. Allah could have commanded a strike from Pakistan.
If a Chinese lunar base got nuked, I think the USA could expect a response in kind, an accurate strike on a small lunar base with an Earth launched missile isn't really the same as a missile that can lob a nuke a few thousand miles.
And they couldn't buy the technology? Remember, the base isn't built yet, so you have a technology gap of more than a few years to consider. Then add in the privatization of space and a middle man to buy a vehicle or vehicles to get a nuke to the moon and viola.
But that technology gap also allows for advances in detection technology, and defensive technology, very cheap in energy terms to hurl a few hundred rocks at an incoming missile from the lunar surface, just as easy to hurl them at the earth too.

I know you've read the moon is a harsh mistress.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome. I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And . . . the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.
D.N.A.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: One way mission to the moon

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:46 pm

Don't Panic wrote:But that technology gap also allows for advances in detection technology, and defensive technology, very cheap in energy terms to hurl a few hundred rocks at an incoming missile from the lunar surface, just as easy to hurl them at the earth too.

I know you've read the moon is a harsh mistress.
How does that determine who launched the missile? And wouldn't stealth technology keep up with detection?
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Don't Panic
Evil Admin
Evil Admin
Posts: 10653
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:19 am
About me: 100% Pure Evil. (Not from Concentrate)
Location: Luimneach, Eire
Contact:

Re: One way mission to the moon

Post by Don't Panic » Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:49 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:
Don't Panic wrote:But that technology gap also allows for advances in detection technology, and defensive technology, very cheap in energy terms to hurl a few hundred rocks at an incoming missile from the lunar surface, just as easy to hurl them at the earth too.

I know you've read the moon is a harsh mistress.
How does that determine who launched the missile? And wouldn't stealth technology keep up with detection?
Who launched the missile would be a case of who objected to the presence of the outpost. If their criminal justice system is anything to go by I don't think they'd worry about evidence.

Detection Vs. stealth depends on the system being used, and only one country on Earth has invested heavily in stealth systems.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome. I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And . . . the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.
D.N.A.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests