C, photons, infinity (and beyond!)

[Twiglet]

I'm the only one here who's actually answered the OP and given the supporting scientific evidence: http://www.rationalia.com/forum/viewtop ... 95#p488316. Others such as Twiglet have professed a liking for mystery, which I've countered with more scientific evidence: http://www.rationalia.com/forum/viewtop ... 95#p488330. Don't kid yourself that your abuse conceals your dismissal of the scientific evidence

I rather do like a good mystery farsight. But I don't resort to unsubstantiated fantasies to explain it, and the unsubstantiated fantasies I find interesting are not things I present as science. You don't seem to realise there's a difference.

[Farsight]

Poppycock. Look at this rot:

There's no "why" for that in physics, it's just what seems to be true.

The question is transcendental. The theoretical answer borders on relgious. Counterexplanations simply lack any evidence to support them.

I've given the explanation and the supporting scientific evidence, not just for this, but also in response to your many challenges. And yet you duck and dive and dismiss it all. You think pair production isn't scientific evidence? And magnetic dipole moment and the Einstein-de Haas effect? Or that clocks don't clock up motion? Sheesh. Just like all those YECs and fundamentalists, you cling to mysticism, and dismiss any evidence that challenges it as "unsubstantiated fantasies".

[Twiglet]

Poppycock. Look at this rot:

There's no "why" for that in physics, it's just what seems to be true.

The question is transcendental. The theoretical answer borders on relgious. Counterexplanations simply lack any evidence to support them.

I've given the explanation and the supporting scientific evidence, not just for this, but also in response to your many challenges. And yet you duck and dive and dismiss it all. You think pair production isn't scientific evidence? And magnetic dipole moment and the Einstein-de Haas effect? Or that clocks don't clock up motion? Sheesh. Just like all those YECs and fundamentalists, you cling to mysticism, and dismiss any evidence that challenges it as "unsubstantiated fantasies".

What I think... is that you don't know your arse from your elbow, and you can't even solve problems which wouldn't trouble sixteen year old science students. You've certainly not demonstrated your ability to do so here.

[ChildInAZoo]

It is very odd for someone to claim that they have solved physics problems while not being able to show how their solution produces measurable predictions.