Which is why any theoretical asteroid impact will hit a major US city.klr wrote:Behind that advice, you can hear the NASA funding can a-rattlin'.
Nasa chief Charles Bolden's advice on asteroid
Re: Nasa chief Charles Bolden's advice on asteroid
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41304
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Nasa chief Charles Bolden's advice on asteroid
Whereas most asteroids that hit land actually end up in Siberia, the deserts of Northern China and Tibet, or in the Sahara.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 52180
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 8-34-20
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Nasa chief Charles Bolden's advice on asteroid
Pray?Audley Strange wrote:So any suggestion on how we protect ourselves from vast speeding rocks?
- Blind groper
- Posts: 3997
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
- About me: From New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: Nasa chief Charles Bolden's advice on asteroid
The key to intervention is early detection. A small nudge in an asteroid's orbit is sufficient to stop it hitting the Earth if that nudge is applied early enough. There are researchers working on systems for tracking asteroids and calculating their likely impact if it happens, while they are still out beyond Mars orbit.
If such an impact was calculated, the asteroid would need to be met by a space probe, and an engine installed to move it slightly, to make it miss.
I wonder if a few nukes might do it. Not to break it up, which would be disastrous, but to nudge it sideways?
Depends on the structure of the asteroid I suppose.
If such an impact was calculated, the asteroid would need to be met by a space probe, and an engine installed to move it slightly, to make it miss.
I wonder if a few nukes might do it. Not to break it up, which would be disastrous, but to nudge it sideways?
Depends on the structure of the asteroid I suppose.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Nasa chief Charles Bolden's advice on asteroid
Put up some mirrors a few years before it is due to arrive and focus the Sun on the rogue. Light pressure might be enough to move it to a different orbit.Blind groper wrote:The key to intervention is early detection. A small nudge in an asteroid's orbit is sufficient to stop it hitting the Earth if that nudge is applied early enough. There are researchers working on systems for tracking asteroids and calculating their likely impact if it happens, while they are still out beyond Mars orbit.
If such an impact was calculated, the asteroid would need to be met by a space probe, and an engine installed to move it slightly, to make it miss.
I wonder if a few nukes might do it. Not to break it up, which would be disastrous, but to nudge it sideways?
Depends on the structure of the asteroid I suppose.
- Blind groper
- Posts: 3997
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
- About me: From New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: Nasa chief Charles Bolden's advice on asteroid
Interesting idea, Gawdzilla, but do you have any idea how tiny, really really tiny, light pressure is? We are talking of a massive lump of rock, millions of tonnes, travelling at something over 10 kms per second. To divert it even a little bit is going to take an awful lot of thrust!
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.
- Blind groper
- Posts: 3997
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
- About me: From New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: Nasa chief Charles Bolden's advice on asteroid
I had another idea, which is probably too costly to implement????
However, each asteroid that is going to come close to the Earth will be in a near Earth orbit, which means that it comes near our planet every time. Could we set up that many space probes to land on all the near Earth orbit asteroids when they come past next time? A space probe comes with its own engine - possibly an ion drive, that could use asteroid material for reaction mass.
It also can beep a signal for Earth receivers to monitor, and keep tract of position. If the asteroid, on a later close by pass, looks like it might hit the Earth, a radio signal could tell the probe to fire up its engine (for a period of months) to divert the asteroid that tiny bit needed. It might even be possible to automate the whole thing so that the probe computer monitors the asteroid position, and fires itself up to divert the asteroid without external instructions.
However, each asteroid that is going to come close to the Earth will be in a near Earth orbit, which means that it comes near our planet every time. Could we set up that many space probes to land on all the near Earth orbit asteroids when they come past next time? A space probe comes with its own engine - possibly an ion drive, that could use asteroid material for reaction mass.
It also can beep a signal for Earth receivers to monitor, and keep tract of position. If the asteroid, on a later close by pass, looks like it might hit the Earth, a radio signal could tell the probe to fire up its engine (for a period of months) to divert the asteroid that tiny bit needed. It might even be possible to automate the whole thing so that the probe computer monitors the asteroid position, and fires itself up to divert the asteroid without external instructions.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Nasa chief Charles Bolden's advice on asteroid
The boffin that proposed it said he had a design for a 46 square mile mirror that weighed a few hundred pounds for the mirror surface. He said a few years would be needed for some rock, a few decades for others. And the mirror, if focused carefully, would cause outgassing of rocky material, adding to the effect.Blind groper wrote:Interesting idea, Gawdzilla, but do you have any idea how tiny, really really tiny, light pressure is? We are talking of a massive lump of rock, millions of tonnes, travelling at something over 10 kms per second. To divert it even a little bit is going to take an awful lot of thrust!
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Nasa chief Charles Bolden's advice on asteroid
Most likely.PsychoSerenity wrote:They'd end up praying to it.mistermack wrote:Maybe they should be planning for " the end of civilisation ".
Not by trying to move an asteroid off course, but by protecting all the knowledge that has been gained so far, from any catastrophic impact.
I would put it all on a specially designed satellite, and have it updateable constantly.
Then, all you need to do is to provide the people who are left, with the means to access the satellite. So all the knowledge that we have will be safe for ever, so long as a few people survive.
Still, I think it's a good idea, and not just for catastrophic asteroid impacts.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- FBM
- Ratz' first Gritizen.
- Posts: 45327
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
- About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach" - Contact:
Re: Nasa chief Charles Bolden's advice on asteroid
One of the possibilities offered up was to place a large mass next to the asteroid and let the gravity slowly pull it off course. The nuke possibility was rejected long ago, iirc. You'd just wind up with a lot of smaller pieces showering down on the earth.
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
- Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
- Contact:
Re: Nasa chief Charles Bolden's advice on asteroid
They also theorized painting it black, and the increased force of light would move it. Of course that takes time.Gawdzilla Sama wrote:The boffin that proposed it said he had a design for a 46 square mile mirror that weighed a few hundred pounds for the mirror surface. He said a few years would be needed for some rock, a few decades for others. And the mirror, if focused carefully, would cause outgassing of rocky material, adding to the effect.Blind groper wrote:Interesting idea, Gawdzilla, but do you have any idea how tiny, really really tiny, light pressure is? We are talking of a massive lump of rock, millions of tonnes, travelling at something over 10 kms per second. To divert it even a little bit is going to take an awful lot of thrust!
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
- FBM
- Ratz' first Gritizen.
- Posts: 45327
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
- About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach" - Contact:
Re: Nasa chief Charles Bolden's advice on asteroid
I've heard of a "solar sail" before, but not sure if it was in this context. 
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 74451
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Nasa chief Charles Bolden's advice on asteroid
Light possesses momentum, and when it reflects from a large area but light weight foil sail, it can produce effective changes in momentum of whatever it hits...FBM wrote:I've heard of a "solar sail" before, but not sure if it was in this context.
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
- FBM
- Ratz' first Gritizen.
- Posts: 45327
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
- About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach" - Contact:
Re: Nasa chief Charles Bolden's advice on asteroid
They've been proposed for providing thrust (?) to spacecraft, so given enough time I imagine they could alter the path of an asteroid. But I think it would take a long time. We'd need to know about the incoming rock well in advance.
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 74451
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Nasa chief Charles Bolden's advice on asteroid
If an asteroid is a million times more massive than a spacecraft (which, for a dangerous one, will be a minimal figure), it will take a million times longer to alter its velocity, given the same area of light sail...FBM wrote:They've been proposed for providing thrust (?) to spacecraft, so given enough time I imagine they could alter the path of an asteroid. But I think it would take a long time. We'd need to know about the incoming rock well in advance.
An ion engine, landed on the asteroid, and using the asteroids substance as reaction mass is a much more realistic solution...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests
