Compassion in World Farming

User avatar
nellikin
Dirt(y) girl
Posts: 2299
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: KSC
Location: Newcastle, Oz
Contact:

Re: Compassion in World Farming

Post by nellikin » Sun Apr 01, 2012 10:08 am

JimC wrote:In Australia, beef and lamb at least are raised on pasture rather than feed-lots. Also, our household only buys free-range chickens and eggs, whichever comes first...
This is really dependant on the farm and supplier. In NSW/VIC, Coles (and I assume Woolies is similar) has semi-intensive cattle farms as suppliers. Hundreds of head of cattle are grain-fed (outside) in feed-lots. There is more room than in many of the factories in the US/Europe (I once visited a farm in Eastern Germany which had 800 head of catlle in a shed, standing in their own faeces and urine, eating fodder in troughs, not really seeing the outside long at all), and if you can source the right quality, you can get pasture-fed beef that has never even seen a shed from the outside, let alone inside. In the Hunter there are some great farms like this - basically organic but without the certification. I've visited some and sometimes the farmer has to drive 20 kms just to visit his cows in the paddock. Of course, the meat is more expensive, but worth it.

Also, due to hygiene issues, most pigs are kept in sheds, as they can easily transmit to/catch diseases from humans. Chicken farming is abominable and even 'free-range' has a pitiful minimum standard often. Once again, so much is dependant upon the supplier.

I like eating meat but try to buy organic, free-range or certified sustainable meat.
To ignore the absence of evidence is the base of true faith.
-Gore Vidal

User avatar
amused
amused
Posts: 3873
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:04 pm
About me: Reinvention phase initiated
Contact:

Re: Compassion in World Farming

Post by amused » Sun Apr 01, 2012 11:37 am

I'm in Texas, y'all, so BBQ beef has always been a staple. Huge Porterhouse and T-bones, nom! Buuuut, recent blood tests revealed a very high load of the 'bad' cholesterol, so I've recently switched to mostly fish, chicken, and legume/rice combos for protein. The last blood test showed an improvement, so I'm hopeful my next checkup will continue that trendline. I know that the fish and chicken are still factory farmed, but so are the legumes and rice. What to do....

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: Compassion in World Farming

Post by Rum » Sun Apr 01, 2012 7:00 pm

Azathoth wrote:
Blind groper wrote:By that definition, I am a meat addict.
Here in New Zealand, the only real 'factory farming' is poultry. I do not know how much suffering that may or may not induce in the hens being reared. I know that assorted animal rights groups are on the rampage about it. So far, without achieving very much. While I would prefer some rules to be put into place requiring more space for hens to live in, I do not know how much of a crime the current practice might or might not be.

Good science appears to be thin on the ground. I am not sure how a research project could objectively measure poultry pain and welfare. I agree the work needs to be done, but it needs to be done well. Crappy research is worse than no research.
Chicken welfare is about as high on my list of things that bother me as prawn welfare. The intelligence is comparable
If compassion isn't on your list of priorities for small brained birds, taste might be. Free range chicken, which is all I ever buy besides being produced from more humanely kept chickens tastes much much better as the animals can run around more and develop muscle. The difference is very obvious when you try.

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Compassion in World Farming

Post by Blind groper » Sun Apr 01, 2012 7:17 pm

All of which may or may not be true.
What I do now, though, is that if I buy a hen for roasting, it costs me $10
If I buy an 'organic' hen for roasting, no bigger, it costs me $20.

I am not wealthy enough to spend double on some kind of whim, so the normal chicken is what I eat.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

User avatar
tattuchu
a dickload of cocks
Posts: 21889
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:59 pm
About me: I'm having trouble with the trolley.
Location: Marmite-upon-Toast, Wankershire
Contact:

COMPASSION FOR DAKOTA FANNING

Post by tattuchu » Sun Apr 01, 2012 11:26 pm

I eat much less meat than I used to. When I do get meat, I try my damndest to get organic, grass-fed, etc. Often the organic beef and lamb I find are imported from Australia ans New Zealand. But whether from down below or more local,they're like entirely different animals! The taste and texture are completely different, and so much better. For taste alone, I can never go back to factory farmed. Even the organic eggs I get (common enough around here now that they're even very reasonably priced) are far superior in flavor and even appearance.
People think "queue" is just "q" followed by 4 silent letters.

But those letters are not silent.

They're just waiting their turn.

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: COMPASSION FOR DAKOTA FANNING

Post by maiforpeace » Mon Apr 02, 2012 12:01 am

tattuchu wrote:I eat much less meat than I used to. When I do get meat, I try my damndest to get organic, grass-fed, etc. Often the organic beef and lamb I find are imported from Australia ans New Zealand. But whether from down below or more local,they're like entirely different animals! The taste and texture are completely different, and so much better. For taste alone, I can never go back to factory farmed. Even the organic eggs I get (common enough around here now that they're even very reasonably priced) are far superior in flavor and even appearance.
:this:

OK, for those of you who don't care or think there is any suffering going on with these animals, what about these reasons:

Factory farmed meat vs pastured raised meat

TASTEWISE - it's like processed American cheese vs a 10 year old aged cheddar.
NUTRITIONALLY - it's like white bread vs whole grain bread.

THE ENVIRONMENT:
THE LAND: it's like everything going into a a landfill vs recycling
THE AIR: driving a prius vs a hummer
THE WATER TABLE: fracking vs no fracking

How illogical!!! 8-)
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: COMPASSION FOR DAKOTA FANNING

Post by Seth » Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:29 am

maiforpeace wrote:
tattuchu wrote:I eat much less meat than I used to. When I do get meat, I try my damndest to get organic, grass-fed, etc. Often the organic beef and lamb I find are imported from Australia ans New Zealand. But whether from down below or more local,they're like entirely different animals! The taste and texture are completely different, and so much better. For taste alone, I can never go back to factory farmed. Even the organic eggs I get (common enough around here now that they're even very reasonably priced) are far superior in flavor and even appearance.
:this:

OK, for those of you who don't care or think there is any suffering going on with these animals, what about these reasons:

Factory farmed meat vs pastured raised meat
As old Hugh Glass, the one-bite cannibal once said, "Meat's meat." Cows are made by man for man, but if you want to pay a premium price for grass-fed organic beef, be my guest...or my customer (until I sold the ranch) and enjoy. If you want cheap food however, don't worry too much because they are just dumb beasts, and I do mean dumb. Cows don't care where they are as long as they get fed regularly.
TASTEWISE - it's like processed American cheese vs a 10 year old aged cheddar.
I seriously doubt you can actually tell the difference between "factory" beef (meaning it was started on grass somewhere, then sent to a feedlot where it was finished on grain or corn before being slaughtered) and free-range organic beef in a double blind taste-test, but it might be interesting to try one. The flavor and texture of beef is mostly dependent on what the animal ate in the last six months of life and on how much exercise it's had. The more exercise, the tougher the meat. That's why Kobe cows are kept standing in stalls and are massaged and fed beer...and are genetically bred for high fat content marbling.
NUTRITIONALLY - it's like white bread vs whole grain bread.
Not really. It's all protein and your body can't tell the difference between Kobe beef, feedlot beef and free-range grass-fed beef. Meat's meat.

For someone who believes in science, you're particularly gullible when it comes to unsupported nutritional claims about supposedly "organic" or "natural" foods, most of which are indistinguishable scientifically from "ordinary" food and produce. About the only measurable difference is a reduction in pesticide contamination and antibiotic/steroid residue in meat.
THE ENVIRONMENT:
THE LAND: it's like everything going into a a landfill vs recycling
Oh hogwash! Non-organic and organic produce are grown on virtually the same ground, and it's all "recyclable." Literally the only difference between "organic" meat and "factory farmed" meat is lower yields from "organic" beef because the ranchers don't use steroids or antibiotics, which means their cows don't fatten up as quickly and are more prone to disease. Yes, organic beef has fewer (though usually not zero) antibiotics and steroids in it, which is not a bad thing, but most people don't care as long as their hamburger is cheap.

And the fact is that if every rancher had to produce "organic" beef by law, your hamburger would cost you $50 a shot because the economies of scale and the markets don't support the added expense of organic farming except on a small, specialized customer scale. There simply isn't enough "grass" out there to feed every cow, pig or chicken we eat ever year "naturally" and "organically."

Feedlot farming exists because of the demand for meat which grossly outstrips the capacity of organic operations to meet the demand.

And add to that the burdens that the government puts on ranchers to begin with, including new regulations that will cost ranchers tens of thousands of dollars to track each and every animal they raise from birth to the packing plant using microchips. Most "organic" ranchers are small operations with a few hundred or thousand cows at most and they operate on a very, very slim margin. That beef you get for four bucks a pound paid the rancher about 75 cents a pound or so, before expenses.

THE AIR: driving a prius vs a hummer
Cows fart. Factory (feedlot) cows fart just as much as grass-fed cows do. And when they make a hybrid electric vehicle that has the same capabilities, range and capacity as a Hummer, I'll damned sure buy one. Nothing in sight yet, so I'll continue driving the one I already have.
THE WATER TABLE: fracking vs no fracking


There's legitimate concerns about water pollution from concentrated feedlot operations, but both the states and the feds have strict regulations about discharges into waterways. And free-range grass-fed operations are not currently subject to any regulations regarding runoff, although the feds are toying with them...which will put many small organic operations (like mine) out of business entirely.

And fracking takes place thousands of feet below the water tables, and there has been exactly ONE EPA confirmed case of fracking fluid in a water well, in Wyoming. So long as the well casing is properly cemented and sealed, which is required to keep the gas in the pipe anyway, fracking fluid does not contaminate any water tables. What does occasionally cause pollution are fracking fluid pits where local laws allow drillers to pump the waste fluid into an open pit, which they then cover up and abandon. In the past this lead to leaching of fracking fluid into shallow water supplies and adjacent water users were rightfully outraged at this.

This is becoming quite rare however, and recent laws in most states require pit liners to prevent leaching during drilling and fracking and require that not only is the fluid pumped into trucks and disposed of at an authorized disposal site, but that the liners and contaminated soil are removed and properly disposed of and the pits filled in. One of my good friends is in the business of removing and hauling away pit liners and remediating contaminated soil, so I know this to be true.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51325
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Compassion in World Farming

Post by Tero » Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:52 am

I dont eat hamburgers at fast food places. Our beef is not every day and it all comes from a "meat locker" in Nebraska. I have no idea before that but there are no feed lots nearby.

Store meat travels a long way, it has additives.

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Compassion in World Farming

Post by Blind groper » Mon Apr 02, 2012 5:47 am

I find myself agreeing with Seth here.
Of course, I don't live in America and the meat I eat is normally grass fed. But not organic. The 'organic' business is not based on science, and it covers an awful lot more than whether an animal is fed on grass or grain. None of the meat I buy is organic, but all the beef and lamb is grass fed. By not buying organic, I save a small fortune.

Researchers looking at milk analysed dozens of samples of organic versus conventional, and found exactly zero difference in terms of flavour chemicals, and fat/protein/lactose levels, and calcium and other possible health related components. Paying double for organic milk means spending twice as much to get the same thing. While many people get all paranoid about antibiotics and hormones added, by the time it is processed by the animal's body, and in milk or meat, the added amounts are trivial and of exactly zero health consequence to the consumer.

I also know that other researchers did an equivalent study on organic versus conventional eggs. A slight difference in colour, but no significant differences in any health important component.

On taste - the main factor there is what it is fed. The best beef I ever ate was Argentinian from cows fed on pampas grass. The food adds flavour. The most 'organic' meat I ever ate was totally organic, since it was wild venison. It tasted foul! We also produce domestic venison, which feeds on farmed grasses. Tastes wonderful! While the kind of food affects flavour of meat, whether it is 'organic' or conventional is irrelevant.

The basic problem with organic agriculture is that it is based on dogma, not science. For example, organic orchardists are permitted to use copper sulfate as a spray to control mould, but not any synthetic chemical. This is ridiculous because copper sulfate is a toxin to the human liver, and is terribly toxic to earthworms. it is also non biodegradable and can stay in soils, at levels toxic to soil animals, for decades. But copper sulfate is found in nature as a natural ore, and thus must be OK. It is natural.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: Compassion in World Farming

Post by Rum » Mon Apr 02, 2012 8:06 am

We aren't talking about organic (the OP wasn't meant to anyway), but about keeping and slaughtering animals humanely. It may be a 'whim' to you as you referred to it above but if you can be bothered to take a look on the net (just type 'factory farmed chicken' for example), the facts and conditions aren't even hidden.

I suspect one day we will look back at the way we kept such animals in the way we look back at barbaric ways we looked after vulnerable people a century or two ago - with horror and disgust.

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Compassion in World Farming

Post by Blind groper » Mon Apr 02, 2012 8:21 am

Rum

With chicken we have a problem.
While I am inclined to agree that we should give them a bit more space while rearing them, we do not know what is optimal or correct for raising them. How much crowding before they suffer? I do not know, and neither do you.

I am not in favour of cruelty to animals. Mostly, we tell ourselves that we will know 'intuitively' what is cruel and what is not. Sometimes that is correct.......
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: Compassion in World Farming

Post by Rum » Mon Apr 02, 2012 8:27 am

Blind groper wrote:Rum

With chicken we have a problem.
While I am inclined to agree that we should give them a bit more space while rearing them, we do not know what is optimal or correct for raising them. How much crowding before they suffer? I do not know, and neither do you.

I am not in favour of cruelty to animals. Mostly, we tell ourselves that we will know 'intuitively' what is cruel and what is not. Sometimes that is correct.......
Optimum? I'm not talking about optimum, just better. Don't look at this if you are feeling squeamish or are about to eat (chicken especially!) and tell me it is defensible. ..and it isn't just chicken. I won't touch pork.
Trigger Warning!!!1! :
Image

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: Compassion in World Farming

Post by maiforpeace » Mon Apr 02, 2012 9:11 am

Yes, and in some countries those cages are stacked 20 stories high...how nice do you think that chicken on the bottom, covered with the feces of the rest of them- you really think that chicken good food?
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Compassion in World Farming

Post by Blind groper » Mon Apr 02, 2012 9:43 am

I have no problem with treating animals better.
Where I have a problem is actually nailing down what is going to be the best way of dealing with them, based on solid and objectively derived data. I do not like emotion based conclusions. We need to know what is best, based on empirical, and objective data. Do you have such data? I am open to your ideas.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: Compassion in World Farming

Post by maiforpeace » Mon Apr 02, 2012 9:51 am

Blind groper wrote:I have no problem with treating animals better.
Where I have a problem is actually nailing down what is going to be the best way of dealing with them, based on solid and objectively derived data. I do not like emotion based conclusions. We need to know what is best, based on empirical, and objective data. Do you have such data? I am open to your ideas.
It's not a simple solution by any means.

And I absolutely agree with you...we will get nowhere making emotion based conclusions.

And unfortunately I'm not the best when it comes to being scientific and objective when it comes to presenting data...I don't have a good memory for such things so referencing back isn't easy for me. Sorry Groper, I failed miserably in math, science and statistics. :oops:
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests