Farsight wrote:No, you can't. There's clear evidence for gravitational anomalies, and we are confident that the energy distribution is more non-uniform than is suggested by visible matter. But we cannot distinguish the form of this energy.
Well, if you're just going to deny an entire aspect of GR without having read any of it, you're not going to get very far with actual scientists.
ChildInAZoo wrote:So you simply want to insult everyone here? There is an entire thread here devoted to mathematical physics problems, one that you are suspiciously absent from.
No, I don't want to insult veryone here. I'm absent from that thread because my interest lies in fundamental physics rather than mathematical physics problems.
So will you retract your claim that nobody here would understand the relevant mathematics?
ChildInAZoo wrote:No, really, I don't know what you mean. You are being way too vague. If you would actually give us the solution to the Einstein Field Equation you are using as the basis of your "raisins-in-the-cake analogy" then perhaps we could understand.
You know what I mean. The raisins in the cake analogy Is frequently employed, and it isn't any invention of mine. Again we see a red-herring demand for mathematics as a distraction from the discussion. A solution to the Einstein field equation doesn't tell you the form of the energy that causes the gravity.
Again, you are dead wrong.