.maiforpeace wrote:
![]()
Complain and make a stink AFTER you pass your pharmacy exam. Best of luck with that too!![]()

and

.maiforpeace wrote:
![]()
Complain and make a stink AFTER you pass your pharmacy exam. Best of luck with that too!![]()
Umm, well my entire career hinges on passing this one, and four years of university was pretty much working me up to this one, so yeah, throwing away marks not the greatest idea. (Also it's 70% pass rate, 80% for the mathsXamonas Chegwé wrote:Unless you are worried about passing and need every mark, I would just put a big, fat X through the question and write "none of the above: homeopathy is bullshit" underneath. but maybe that's just me...
"...anyone who says it’s “just the Internet” can. And then when they come back, they can
again." - Tigger
I like your style, ma'am!charlou wrote:Stuff it with hooch, roll it up and smoke it ... would be my response.
And, following the link to the Government report:Content on homeopathy has been removed from the website pending a review by the Department of Health policy team responsible for complementary and alternative medicines.
Homeopathy is not part of mainstream medicine. Instead it is defined as a complementary or alternative medicine. If you are considering using homeopathy, talk to your GP first.
H.M. Government wrote:There has been enough testing of homeopathy and plenty of evidence showing that it is not efficacious...
We conclude that the principle of like-cures-like is theoretically weak. It fails to provide a credible physiological mode of action for homeopathic products. We note that this is the settled view of medical science...
We consider the notion that ultra-dilutions can maintain an imprint of substances previously dissolved in them to be scientifically implausible...
In our view, the systematic reviews and meta-analyses conclusively demonstrate that homeopathic products perform no better than placebos...
The Government should stop allowing the funding of homeopathy on the NHS.
Overall conclusion
By providing homeopathy on the NHS and allowing MHRA licensing of products which subsequently appear on pharmacy shelves, the Government runs the risk of endorsing homeopathy as an efficacious system of medicine. To maintain patient trust, choice and safety, the Government should not endorse the use of placebo treatments, including homeopathy. Homeopathy should not be funded on the NHS and the MHRA should stop licensing homeopathic products.
"...anyone who says it’s “just the Internet” can. And then when they come back, they can
again." - Tigger
aren't all british subjects in positions of authority required to BS the less well informed about the state of things?Pappa wrote:Are pharmacists in NI required to bullshit their customers about sugar pills too?
I thought that "hooch" was a term to designate booze, not hemp?odysseus wrote:I like your style, ma'am!charlou wrote:Stuff it with hooch, roll it up and smoke it ... would be my response.
Yes... though on the last point, I don't think many people believe the royals have a right to be there. There's just the widespread perception that they affect everyone's lives in no practical way at all so there's no impetus to get rid of them. Mostly, they're just a puppet show.Svartalf wrote:aren't all british subjects in positions of authority required to BS the less well informed about the state of things?Pappa wrote:Are pharmacists in NI required to bullshit their customers about sugar pills too?
Like the tories saying they will improve the economy.
or the hanovers claiming they have a right to sit on that big chair.
They have a damned big audience though.Pappa wrote:<Royals> Mostly, they're just a puppet show.
either/or in my experience... a general term for something which will fuck you up nicely....Svartalf wrote:I thought that "hooch" was a term to designate booze, not hemp?odysseus wrote:I like your style, ma'am!charlou wrote:Stuff it with hooch, roll it up and smoke it ... would be my response.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests