Who's the shittiest scientist?

User avatar
Ilovelucy
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:31 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Who's the shittiest scientist?

Post by Ilovelucy » Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:22 am

Richard Feynman! I once picked up one of his academic papers, went straight to a random paragraph in the middle. DIDN'T UNDERSTAND A WORD OF IT!!! I thought to myself, this is just intellectual masturbation. I'm an intelligent guy, if I don't understand it , then it's obviously bollocks! Give me a real straight talking scientist any day, like Richard Hammond or Johnny Ball.
Forums are interesting and if you don't agree, you can fuck off.

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Who's the shittiest scientist?

Post by Clinton Huxley » Thu Dec 09, 2010 12:17 pm

devogue wrote:
Clinton Huxley wrote:Bodhitharta. Who could forget Bodhitharta's Law....? You remember Bodhitharta's Law, right?
:think:

Jude's hippie brother?
He was an RDF legend, for a time. Coined his own Law that "proved" male and female "organs" could not have evolved.
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
Ilovelucy
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:31 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Who's the shittiest scientist?

Post by Ilovelucy » Thu Dec 09, 2010 12:19 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:
devogue wrote:
Clinton Huxley wrote:Bodhitharta. Who could forget Bodhitharta's Law....? You remember Bodhitharta's Law, right?
:think:

Jude's hippie brother?
He was an RDF legend, for a time. Coined his own Law that "proved" male and female "organs" could not have evolved.
Your forgetting the important line of the equation: therefore god exists.

I miss Bod, he was the Isaac Hayes of internet creationism.
Forums are interesting and if you don't agree, you can fuck off.

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Who's the shittiest scientist?

Post by Clinton Huxley » Thu Dec 09, 2010 12:22 pm

Then there was Supersport, originator of the earth-shattering hypothesis - "DNA doesn't do anything, really"

In terms of real scientists, maybe Lysenko
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Who's the shittiest scientist?

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Thu Dec 09, 2010 12:55 pm

Thomas Alva Edison, the biggest prick ever.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Who's the shittiest scientist?

Post by Clinton Huxley » Thu Dec 09, 2010 12:58 pm

That "Panspermia" chappie who thinks eveything is related to alien microbes; the flu? Alien microbes. Red rain in India? Alien microbes.

Or the aquatic ape guy from RDF. Algis? EVERY feature of human physiology explained by our ancestors getting wet occassionally.
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: Who's the shittiest scientist?

Post by mistermack » Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:32 pm

There's no contest.
God is the clear winner, he designed every disease known to man, and he's still working on new ones.
And Jesus fuckin Christ is a close second. He knew the cure for Leprosy, but only cured three in his lifetime. And he knew how to turn water into the best wine, but never told anybody. Crucifiction was too good for him.
.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
hackenslash
Fundie Baiter...errr. Fun Debater
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:05 am
About me: I've got a little black book with my poems in...
Location: Between the cutoff and the resonance
Contact:

Re: Who's the shittiest scientist?

Post by hackenslash » Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:00 pm

Thomas Midgeley Jr.

'Nuff said.
Dogma is the death of the intellect

User avatar
Don't Panic
Evil Admin
Evil Admin
Posts: 10653
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:19 am
About me: 100% Pure Evil. (Not from Concentrate)
Location: Luimneach, Eire
Contact:

Re: Who's the shittiest scientist?

Post by Don't Panic » Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:37 pm

Animavore wrote:Newton didn't like anyone and was notoriously difficult to get along with. I wouldn't really rely on his judge of character.
Newton was an alchemist, the mercury fumes probably addled his brain.


The worst scientist is Ray Comfort, his general theory of banana is utter nonsense, and the special one doesn't work if you invert it.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome. I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And . . . the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.
D.N.A.

User avatar
JOZeldenrust
Posts: 557
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:49 am
Contact:

Re: Who's the shittiest scientist?

Post by JOZeldenrust » Sat Dec 11, 2010 1:53 am

I'd go for Noam Chomsky. His ideas about generative grammar were essential to the development of linguistics, but he's stuck to his preconceptions like a fly to bullshit even after it became obvious that his methods were useless. He could teach dogmatism to the Catholics.

User avatar
Blondie
Forum Desperado
Posts: 1196
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:26 pm
Contact:

Re: Who's the shittiest scientist?

Post by Blondie » Sat Dec 11, 2010 3:56 am

I'm surprised. No one has said Richard Dawkins. He's my pick. He's a good science writer, but that's all.

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: Who's the shittiest scientist?

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Sat Dec 11, 2010 4:30 am

John Gregory Bourke, author of Scatologic Rites of Nations. One can only imagine that he must have got his hands a little dirty penning that masterpiece... :tea:
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
Mysturji
Clint Eastwood
Posts: 5005
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:08 pm
About me: Downloading an app to my necktop
Location: http://tinyurl.com/c9o35ny
Contact:

Re: Who's the shittiest scientist?

Post by Mysturji » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:30 am

I was going to post the name of a prominent scatologist to confuse you all, but in looking for one, I found something even funnier:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scatology wrote: For the beliefs of various religions concerning the End Times, see Eschatology.
Sir Figg Newton wrote:If I have seen further than others, it is only because I am surrounded by midgets.
Cormac wrote:Doom predictors have been with humans right through our history. They are like the proverbial stopped clock - right twice a day, but not due to the efficacy of their prescience.
IDMD2
I am a twit.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests