Conspiracy Theories

[Cunt]

Fake laptop. It's not even an Apple.

lol

[Sean Hayden]

It will all be in Hunter Biden's laptop, if the FBI would just release it.

They don't have to. It's been released. (https://bidenlaptopreport.marcopolousa.org/)

This leaves the FBI free to keep chasing garage door pulls. Good thing, too. That is a crisis that can't be allowed to continue. Those poor nascar drivers...

You know, the important stuff.

Those in the 'Epstein didn't kill himself' camp now have confirmation from a reliable source, or something.

Did you get the client lists of he and his coconspirator and boss, Ms. Maxwell?

Or are they still being protected, as per their original agreement with the convicted traffickers and the other customers?

It's been enlightening to see how much you guys hold to tradition. Warms my cockles.

What could you do with a list of powerful people who used Epstein’s services?

[Cunt]

What could you do with a list of powerful people who used Epstein’s services?

Well, maybe they would all get the 'Russel Brand' treatment, with governments pressing media companies to take away their income streams.

Case in point - Bill Gates. Is supporting him somehow acceptable? Was there a letter to Rumble asking that he be demonitized?

Which people are wholeheartedly in agreement with Gates' social policies? Not, of course, with his child-trafficking pals' business, just the rest of it?

Even if the Clintons were suspected (or revealed) to be on the list, you would still find their foundation earning enough public respect that they would go save children in new war-torn areas.

But the Clinton Foundation popping back up as soon as their are more kids to 'help', that would sound like an outrageous conspiracy theory.

[Brian Peacock]

What could you do with a list of powerful people who used Epstein’s services?

Well, maybe they would all get the 'Russel Brand' treatment, with governments pressing media companies to take away their income streams.

Case in point - Bill Gates. Is supporting him somehow acceptable? Was there a letter to Rumble asking that he be demonitized?

Which people are wholeheartedly in agreement with Gates' social policies? Not, of course, with his child-trafficking pals' business, just the rest of it?

Even if the Clintons were suspected (or revealed) to be on the list, you would still find their foundation earning enough public respect that they would go save children in new war-torn areas.

But the Clinton Foundation popping back up as soon as their are more kids to 'help', that would sound like an outrageous conspiracy theory.

Come off it Cunt. Stop with this 'if they're against Brand they're for Epstein' nonsense. Yes, Epstein was connected to powerful people, but both are (allegedly) horrendous sexual predators who've used their status, wealth, and notoriety to systematically get away with (alleged) terrible abuse. Why do you constantly insist that everyone is somehow backing one or the other of them - or that someone criticising Brand must be a hypocrite for not giving Epstein the same treatment - when they're both dishonourable pieces of shit?

[Sean Hayden]

What could you do with a list of powerful people who used Epstein’s services?

Well, maybe they would all get the 'Russel Brand' treatment, with governments pressing media companies to take away their income streams.

Case in point - Bill Gates. Is supporting him somehow acceptable? Was there a letter to Rumble asking that he be demonitized?

Which people are wholeheartedly in agreement with Gates' social policies? Not, of course, with his child-trafficking pals' business, just the rest of it?

Even if the Clintons were suspected (or revealed) to be on the list, you would still find their foundation earning enough public respect that they would go save children in new war-torn areas.

But the Clinton Foundation popping back up as soon as their are more kids to 'help', that would sound like an outrageous conspiracy theory.

Yeah, not much I guess.

But I was thinking about the feds --what could they do with it? Anyway, it wouldn't surprise anyone to learn that more than a few names on a list like that were tied to ongoing investigations already, or might be now!

[JimC]

The really weird thing about most of the crazy right-wing conspiracy theories is their identification of the rich and the powerful, and the mainstream media they own and control with the left!

[pErvinalia]

And the mainstream media is centrist at best. The far right, being so far right think it's leftist because it's left of them.

[Cunt]

What could you do with a list of powerful people who used Epstein’s services?

Well, maybe they would all get the 'Russel Brand' treatment, with governments pressing media companies to take away their income streams.

Case in point - Bill Gates. Is supporting him somehow acceptable? Was there a letter to Rumble asking that he be demonitized?

Which people are wholeheartedly in agreement with Gates' social policies? Not, of course, with his child-trafficking pals' business, just the rest of it?

Even if the Clintons were suspected (or revealed) to be on the list, you would still find their foundation earning enough public respect that they would go save children in new war-torn areas.

But the Clinton Foundation popping back up as soon as their are more kids to 'help', that would sound like an outrageous conspiracy theory.

Come off it Cunt. Stop with this 'if they're against Brand they're for Epstein' nonsense.

That's not what I mean, BP.


The reason they are giving for freaking out about him doesn't add up to me, considering how accepting everyone is of known associates of Epstein. Convicted rapists don't get this much attention, and he is triggering letters from the government to Rumble almost asking to take away his income. Not quite asking, because I think they were trying to sound weak.

Yes, Epstein was connected to powerful people, but both are (allegedly) horrendous sexual predators who've used their status, wealth, and notoriety to systematically get away with (alleged) terrible abuse. Why do you constantly insist that everyone is somehow backing one or the other of them - or that someone criticising Brand must be a hypocrite for not giving Epstein the same treatment - when they're both dishonourable pieces of shit?

Not insisting that, just that the attention of the media, if consistent, would pursue both men like Brand, and those who were known associates of Epstein, who may have witnessed or suspected something.

Of course they don't care about either, but why ACT like they care so much this time?

What could you do with a list of powerful people who used Epstein’s services?

Well, maybe they would all get the 'Russel Brand' treatment, with governments pressing media companies to take away their income streams.

Case in point - Bill Gates. Is supporting him somehow acceptable? Was there a letter to Rumble asking that he be demonitized?

Which people are wholeheartedly in agreement with Gates' social policies? Not, of course, with his child-trafficking pals' business, just the rest of it?

Even if the Clintons were suspected (or revealed) to be on the list, you would still find their foundation earning enough public respect that they would go save children in new war-torn areas.

But the Clinton Foundation popping back up as soon as their are more kids to 'help', that would sound like an outrageous conspiracy theory.

Yeah, not much I guess.

But I was thinking about the feds --what could they do with it? Anyway, it wouldn't surprise anyone to learn that more than a few names on a list like that were tied to ongoing investigations already, or might be now!

I don't know, but if a bunch of lawyers wanted to tangle a case up, say, a HUGE international criminal group, one way to complicate it and make more billable hours, is to use legal delays from both the alleged perpetrator, 'John Doe', and victim of extortion, 'John Doe'.

But that would be a really crazy conspiracy theory.

[Cunt]

What if 'The Science' contradicts Big Tony and the UN? (UNdemocracy group that thinks they run the world)

https://notrickszone.com/2023/10/17/974 ... o2-change/

Furthermore, the analysis reveals that of the 90 ppm rise in CO2 since 1958 (the Mauna Loa era), not more than 12 ppm could be said to have derived from fossil fuel emissions. And when the CO2 rose to 383 ppm in the early 1940s, the impact from anthropogenic emissions “can be largely excluded.”

[macdoc]

What a jolly load of horse shit.
Read some science instead of right wing claptrap.

[Cunt]

horse shit

Climate change? Ya, but we all knew that. Your left-wing pro-commie nutbags have made it abundantly clear to anyone outside their congregations.

The only thing funnier, would be if they bought waterfront properties after threatening rising sea levels lol

Best of all, some of the biggest polluters aren't targeted by 'Greta & Co.'

Trigger Warning!!!1! :

[macdoc]

Try per capita ..how pathetic ....get your fucking nose out of right wing denier shit pile. Talk about a ewe.
This is a science thread not your soapbox for the rightwingdings you parrot.

[Cunt]

Try per capita ..how pathetic ....get your fucking nose out of right wing denier shit pile. Talk about a ewe.
This is a science thread not your soapbox for the rightwingdings you parrot.

For decades, the spokespeople for the global warming/climate change/global cooling/sky is falling alarmists have been VERY believable.

Except they got fat rich and bought on the waterfront.

Kinda makes them seem more sciency and authoritative!

[Brian Peacock]

Global heating doesn't distinguish between the right or left. Remember that next time your running from a wildfire.

[Cunt]

Global heating doesn't distinguish between the right or left. Remember that next time your running from a wildfire.

Wow. Deep. I should really rethink things.

I mean, if it gets cooler, that's humans ruining earth. If it gets warmer, humans ruining earth. If ANYTHING happens, it proves climatechangeglobalwarmingglobalcooling.

I'm almost convinced to see everythingas imminent threat and blaming human activity.

Oh - no - wait a sec.

That was just gas.