Love :-)

User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: Love :-)

Post by kiki5711 » Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:01 pm

Gallstones wrote:With age and suffering comes wisdom--one hopes.

I agree with you kiki, that love alone isn't enough. But there being no love and only practicalities isn't enough either.

Oh, absolutely! Without love, from birth to death, without neurishing love as we grow, we lack to become human only to function with malnourished brain acting out on impulse becasue of that lack of love, again bringing us to self destruction.

It's a fine line and everyone deals with it differently. This is where some people can take one same experience and make good out of it, while some others take it to out of limits of hell harming themselves in the process and others that stand in their path.

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: Love :-)

Post by Pappa » Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:29 pm

FBM wrote:According to whatever I read, the nobility married for the reasons you allude to, like politics, wealth, etc, and dabbling in romantic liasons with troubadors was their relief from loveless pairings. The troubadors' songs and poems were eventually written down and gradually evolved into romantic plays and novels. The upper classes would have been the only ones likely to have sufficient money, literacy and leisure time to enjoy and support the art(s). I would guess that the ideal of romantic love spread from the nobility to the lower classes, but I could be wrong about that, of course.
The upper classes in Britain always had (and mostly/often still have) an unsaid agreement between spouses. Once a male heir is produced they're both free to go fuck whoever they please, as long as they keep it quiet enough to avoid scandal.
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.


When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.

User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: Love :-)

Post by kiki5711 » Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:47 pm

Also, now that I think about it more, her research seems to have been done mostly with what's considered (or was considered) the "normal relationships ie. white/straight/western culture". She doesn't seem to take in account of all the different cultures where she would find totally different results based on their beliefs and tradition, on the same subject.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Love :-)

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:08 pm

FBM wrote:According to whatever I read, the nobility married for the reasons you allude to, like politics, wealth, etc, and dabbling in romantic liasons with troubadors was their relief from loveless pairings. The troubadors' songs and poems were eventually written down and gradually evolved into romantic plays and novels. The upper classes would have been the only ones likely to have sufficient money, literacy and leisure time to enjoy and support the art(s). I would guess that the ideal of romantic love spread from the nobility to the lower classes, but I could be wrong about that, of course.
This is where Myrdeen Anderson's theory that the Church encouraged, if not created, the idea of romantic love. They could manipulate people to some extent to circumvent the noble's arranged (i.e., political) marriages by promoting "love of the heart". She could do better justice to this than I could, of course. And I wasn't 100% sold on it at the time I took her class, but I regurgitated the proper words on the tests. (She gave me bonus points for a study of which side of the hall we walk on.)
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: Love :-)

Post by Gallstones » Mon Jan 23, 2012 6:54 am

But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: Love :-)

Post by kiki5711 » Mon Jan 23, 2012 11:38 am

Gallstones wrote:Awwww...

Sweethearts reunite after nearly 60 yrs

awwwww, how adorable!!!!!!!!!!!!!! great story!!

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: Love :-)

Post by Gallstones » Tue Jan 24, 2012 5:36 am

But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: Love :-)

Post by kiki5711 » Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:43 am


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests