Tea kettle question - part two

User avatar
JacksSmirkingRevenge
Grand Wazoo
Posts: 13516
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:56 pm
About me: Half man - half yak.
Location: Perfidious Albion
Contact:

Re: Tea kettle question - part two

Post by JacksSmirkingRevenge » Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:19 pm

Just so long as the milk isn't put in with the teabag first, it's all good. :levi:
Sent from my Interositor using Twatatalk.

PsychoSerenity
"I" Self-Perceive Recursively
Posts: 7824
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:57 am
Contact:

Re: Tea kettle question - part two

Post by PsychoSerenity » Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:45 pm

MiM wrote:Psycho, admittedly I didn't check thorough through your calculations, but I think it is wrong to use the same k for both the tea and the mix in

T(t) = T2 + (T1 - T2) e^-kt

Clearly in normal circumstances a larger mass (tea+milk) will cool more slowly than a smaller one (only tea), so the k you are using is specific for a specific body (mass, form and material) and cannot be used as a constant in the way you do.

What people have been posting about here is only on factor in how k may be different. The probably most important factor in making up the difference in k lies in the different masses of the bodies.
Ahh I get you. And re-reading your second comment makes mores sense now - it was your first one that threw me. But surely adding the milk, I assume in a mug, elongates the cylinder, increasing the ratio of surface area to volume?
[Disclaimer - if this is comes across like I think I know what I'm talking about, I want to make it clear that I don't. I'm just trying to get my thoughts down]

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41047
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Tea kettle question - part two

Post by Svartalf » Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:54 pm

JacksSmirkingRevenge wrote:Just so long as the milk isn't put in with the teabag first, it's all good. :levi:
So, do you teabag the milkman too?
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
MiM
Man In The Middle
Posts: 5459
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:07 pm
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Tea kettle question - part two

Post by MiM » Mon Oct 31, 2011 9:16 pm

Psychoserenity wrote:
MiM wrote:Psycho, admittedly I didn't check thorough through your calculations, but I think it is wrong to use the same k for both the tea and the mix in

T(t) = T2 + (T1 - T2) e^-kt

Clearly in normal circumstances a larger mass (tea+milk) will cool more slowly than a smaller one (only tea), so the k you are using is specific for a specific body (mass, form and material) and cannot be used as a constant in the way you do.

What people have been posting about here is only on factor in how k may be different. The probably most important factor in making up the difference in k lies in the different masses of the bodies.
Ahh I get you. And re-reading your second comment makes mores sense now - it was your first one that threw me. But surely adding the milk, I assume in a mug, elongates the cylinder, increasing the ratio of surface area to volume?
Yes, but in a normal teacup (porcelain) the transfer from the liquid to the wall and the lenghtwise transfer within the wall is efficient, and the limiting factor will be the transfer from the wall to the air (and table), which doesn't change much, as the size of the cup does not change, and the transfer from liquid to air, which doesn't change at all (giving a cylindrical cup).

With a cup made of a good insulator, the surface area will completely dominate, and this will not change at all.
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - Richard Feynman

User avatar
apophenia
IN DAMNATIO MEMORIAE
Posts: 3373
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 7:41 am
About me: A bird without a feather, a gull without a sea, a flock without a shore.
Location: Farther. Always farther.
Contact:

Re: Tea kettle question - part two

Post by apophenia » Tue Nov 01, 2011 1:45 am

Image
Image

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Tea kettle question - part two

Post by Feck » Tue Nov 01, 2011 1:49 am

The tea (without milk) has a greater surface to volume ratio and it evaporates more quickly ..don't forget to factor that in .
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests